Mattingly
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver. WA
Re: Mattingly
It'll be a LOGJAM at that position....cause I understand that they've also moved Mariota to TE as well.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Mattingly
Eh...logjam wouldn't be the word I would use.polyduck wrote:It'll be a LOGJAM at that position....cause I understand that they've also moved Mariota to TE as well.
-
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver. WA
Re: Mattingly
Whoops.....muh bad!Phenom wrote:Eh...logjam wouldn't be the word I would use.polyduck wrote:It'll be a LOGJAM at that position....cause I understand that they've also moved Mariota to TE as well.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37654
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Mattingly
Alan wrote:Espn reported Breeland as oregon's "breakout" player at TE next season. Not that it means anything this early.
http://www.espn.com/blog/pac12/post/_/i ... ut-players
He's my #1 breakout player for next season. He was electric in high school, and from the small sample we've seen from him at Oregon, I think it's a very educated prediction. I'll be expecting big things from Breeland.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Mattingly
I heard good things about McCormick last year. Not too worried about TE's, actually. Hopefully they can block.
- FlDuckFan
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5068
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:45 am
- GM: Orlando Magic GM
- Location: Florida
Re: Mattingly
Breeland and McCormick look to be good I just wish Mundt had another year of eligibility. He has potential we just had a lot of talent at the position that limited his playing time.
-
- One Star Recruit
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:14 pm
Re: Mattingly
srsmiley007 wrote:A.) he's a fan of his last visit.gosterman01 wrote:Why is everyone so confident we land Falo? Just asking....I would love it but I think he's USC's.
B.) Playing time
C.) proximity
D.) Salave'a
F.) The USC board sounds thinks he's gone
And cause Jhop said so
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Mattingly
Also, Leavitt.
- briarduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3201
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
- Location: Milwaukie OR
Re: Mattingly
I know many of us were pretty excited when we landed Danny and to watch him disappear at LB sucked, I hope this move serves him well! As many of you mentioned if he was a good TE in HS the transition back shouldn't be difficult but obviously he'll have to earn his playing time....I wish him well!
GO DUCKS!!
GO DUCKS!!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
-
- Senior
- Posts: 2833
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
Re: Mattingly
Will Mattingly be a junior or senior?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 4677
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:18 am
Re: Mattingly
senior
-
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:26 am
Re: Mattingly
My bad. Yes and JHOP!OregonDuckPike wrote:srsmiley007 wrote:A.) he's a fan of his last visit.gosterman01 wrote:Why is everyone so confident we land Falo? Just asking....I would love it but I think he's USC's.
B.) Playing time
C.) proximity
D.) Salave'a
F.) The USC board sounds thinks he's gone
And cause Jhop said so