Mattingly

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

polyduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: Vancouver. WA

Re: Mattingly

Post by polyduck »

It'll be a LOGJAM at that position....cause I understand that they've also moved Mariota to TE as well.
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9920
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Mattingly

Post by Phenom »

polyduck wrote:It'll be a LOGJAM at that position....cause I understand that they've also moved Mariota to TE as well.
Eh...logjam wouldn't be the word I would use.
polyduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: Vancouver. WA

Re: Mattingly

Post by polyduck »

Phenom wrote:
polyduck wrote:It'll be a LOGJAM at that position....cause I understand that they've also moved Mariota to TE as well.
Eh...logjam wouldn't be the word I would use.
Whoops.....muh bad! :lol:
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Mattingly

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Alan wrote:Espn reported Breeland as oregon's "breakout" player at TE next season. Not that it means anything this early.

http://www.espn.com/blog/pac12/post/_/i ... ut-players

He's my #1 breakout player for next season. He was electric in high school, and from the small sample we've seen from him at Oregon, I think it's a very educated prediction. I'll be expecting big things from Breeland.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9920
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Mattingly

Post by Phenom »

I heard good things about McCormick last year. Not too worried about TE's, actually. Hopefully they can block.
User avatar
FlDuckFan
All Pac-12
Posts: 5068
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:45 am
GM: Orlando Magic GM
Location: Florida

Re: Mattingly

Post by FlDuckFan »

Breeland and McCormick look to be good I just wish Mundt had another year of eligibility. He has potential we just had a lot of talent at the position that limited his playing time.
OregonDuckPike
One Star Recruit
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:14 pm

Re: Mattingly

Post by OregonDuckPike »

srsmiley007 wrote:
gosterman01 wrote:Why is everyone so confident we land Falo? Just asking....I would love it but I think he's USC's.
A.) he's a fan of his last visit.
B.) Playing time
C.) proximity
D.) Salave'a
F.) The USC board sounds thinks he's gone

And cause Jhop said so
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9920
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Mattingly

Post by Phenom »

Also, Leavitt.
User avatar
briarduck
Senior
Posts: 3201
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:55 am
Location: Milwaukie OR

Re: Mattingly

Post by briarduck »

I know many of us were pretty excited when we landed Danny and to watch him disappear at LB sucked, I hope this move serves him well! As many of you mentioned if he was a good TE in HS the transition back shouldn't be difficult but obviously he'll have to earn his playing time....I wish him well!

GO DUCKS!!
GO DUCKS!! WTD!
RanDux
Senior
Posts: 2833
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
Location: Happy Valley, OR

Re: Mattingly

Post by RanDux »

Will Mattingly be a junior or senior?
thomas time
Senior
Posts: 4677
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:18 am

Re: Mattingly

Post by thomas time »

senior
srsmiley007
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:26 am

Re: Mattingly

Post by srsmiley007 »

OregonDuckPike wrote:
srsmiley007 wrote:
gosterman01 wrote:Why is everyone so confident we land Falo? Just asking....I would love it but I think he's USC's.
A.) he's a fan of his last visit.
B.) Playing time
C.) proximity
D.) Salave'a
F.) The USC board sounds thinks he's gone

And cause Jhop said so
My bad. Yes and JHOP!
Post Reply