Moseley's depth chart
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- alabamaduck
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:56 pm
- Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Re: Moseley's depth chart
Offense and defense are spelled with an "s" not a "c", but a good theory nonetheless
- pudgejeff
- Senior
- Posts: 4897
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
- GM: Sacramento Kings GM
Re: Moseley's depth chart
Belotti talked about malachi having slow foot speed and that was the cause of them moving him away from running back...That could be the reason we haven't seen as much out of him yet...I expect to see him on some seam routes in the future catching pretty balls thrown by DT...because boy can DT make all the throws
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4041
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Duck in the heart of the SEC
Re: Moseley's depth chart
I was asking myself the same question, why all the tight ends? Seems like they could play other positions being they are all big and fast (for their size) and athletic.duckgrad99 wrote:By the way, my immediate thought was to please move a couple of the tight ends to other positions. 8 tight ends is way too many.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine