Moseley's depth chart

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
alabamaduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Birmingham, Alabama

Re: Moseley's depth chart

Post by alabamaduck »

Offense and defense are spelled with an "s" not a "c", but a good theory nonetheless
Image
User avatar
pudgejeff
Senior
Posts: 4897
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Moseley's depth chart

Post by pudgejeff »

Belotti talked about malachi having slow foot speed and that was the cause of them moving him away from running back...That could be the reason we haven't seen as much out of him yet...I expect to see him on some seam routes in the future catching pretty balls thrown by DT...because boy can DT make all the throws
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4041
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Duck in the heart of the SEC

Re: Moseley's depth chart

Post by nogerO »

duckgrad99 wrote:By the way, my immediate thought was to please move a couple of the tight ends to other positions. 8 tight ends is way too many.
I was asking myself the same question, why all the tight ends? Seems like they could play other positions being they are all big and fast (for their size) and athletic.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
Post Reply