League Update

[Oregon Ownage]

It was brought up in the trade discussion thread that some DC's have not been entered. I went through team by team and the teams who need to input a DC are:

Nets (Administration)
Bullets
Hornets
Bucks
Spurs
Grizzlies
Warriors (Administration)
SuperSonics (Administration)

The teams not in administration, you are required to input a DC in by the end of Saturday, if not then you will face a penalty. As for the teams in administration, I will put up their CPU DC's.

Moving forward this will be a point of emphasis before the season starts

Hornets, Grizzlies and Bucks did not post DC in given time. You lose reward bonus when that time comes. If not posted within the next 24 hours, your 1st round pick will be forfeited.

[Oregon Ownage]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

No thoughts on positive encouragement instead of negative punishment?

Penalizing a non-active team isn't going to make them more active. Rewarding active GMs will only make them more interested and active.

Rewarding for doing what your supposed to do?

Exactly. This isn't the no fun zone is it?

It's a healthy stimulus

Im not against it, but how do we base who gets the reward? Everyone? Posts consistently? I would like to have a clear definition of why the reward is being given

[dave]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

No thoughts on positive encouragement instead of negative punishment?

Penalizing a non-active team isn't going to make them more active. Rewarding active GMs will only make them more interested and active.

Rewarding for doing what your supposed to do?

Exactly. This isn't the no fun zone is it?

It's a healthy stimulus

Im not against it, but how do we base who gets the reward? Everyone? Posts consistently? I would like to have a clear definition of why the reward is being given

If you got your DC in time before 1st sim or just league wide because it's fun and you're a nice commish. It helps everyone become more invested.

[bellsduck]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

No thoughts on positive encouragement instead of negative punishment?

Penalizing a non-active team isn't going to make them more active. Rewarding active GMs will only make them more interested and active.

Rewarding for doing what your supposed to do?

Exactly. This isn't the no fun zone is it?

It's a healthy stimulus

Im not against it, but how do we base who gets the reward? Everyone? Posts consistently? I would like to have a clear definition of why the reward is being given

It's not a reward for being active.
It's a reward for getting in a DC. It doesn't have to be all the time. Random.
The punishments will not only discourage involvement for current, it will hurt future owners. Cause lets face it. If a team is not invested enough to enter a DC, he's probably not gonna last long as an owner.