'17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
- All-American
- Posts: 10578
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
I don't think Judson is a RB, move he and Lovette to the slot with Lovette ahead of Nelson.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
You think Judson can play in the slot? His body seems more suited for RB. I agree that Lovette is a slot receiver but we have so many options there already and I saw that he played a little outside this spring. You think he starts ahead of Nelson? Woah. Is Nelson's attitude that bad?buckmarkduck wrote:I don't think Judson is a RB, move he and Lovette to the slot with Lovette ahead of Nelson.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
With Ofodile hurt, there's a lot of opportunity at WR for freshmen to step in and play.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
How long is he out for?UOducksTK1 wrote:With Ofodile hurt, there's a lot of opportunity at WR for freshmen to step in and play.
-
- All-American
- Posts: 10578
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
From all indications Lovette was playing the same spot as Nelson all spring, and honestly outperformed him most of the time. Judson is a different thing, I've been told he was recruited as a slot/RB, but I don't know if he ever even sees the field at either spot. He has a lot of work to do in the weight room and also needs to work on his speed.Phenom wrote:You think Judson can play in the slot? His body seems more suited for RB. I agree that Lovette is a slot receiver but we have so many options there already and I saw that he played a little outside this spring. You think he starts ahead of Nelson? Woah. Is Nelson's attitude that bad?buckmarkduck wrote:I don't think Judson is a RB, move he and Lovette to the slot with Lovette ahead of Nelson.
-
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:02 pm
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Wait, I thought Mattingly was a TE now? Per sources of course.
-
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:36 pm
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Nope, just the bottom of the LB depth chart same as always.odux wrote:Wait, I thought Mattingly was a TE now? Per sources of course.
-
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:36 pm
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
The only quibbles I would have are the OLB position. I'm not sure how they end up going down, but B. Young is at the bottom on your list. I'd put him higher. Swain and Hollins haven't really done much to make me think they'll make a difference. So that's just a position which is hard to call. Any one of them could end up #1.
The other spot I think is Jelks. I just don't think he's ever going to be what we want. I think Leavitt will value space eating over Jelks' skill-set. He'll end up being a specialist coming in situationally. I don't think Jelks is an every down player. He's never proven he can be for long stretches, and he didn't look much different this spring. He is what he is.
The other spot I think is Jelks. I just don't think he's ever going to be what we want. I think Leavitt will value space eating over Jelks' skill-set. He'll end up being a specialist coming in situationally. I don't think Jelks is an every down player. He's never proven he can be for long stretches, and he didn't look much different this spring. He is what he is.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Unknown, but he's already been out a couple months, so not good for him.Phenom wrote:How long is he out for?UOducksTK1 wrote:With Ofodile hurt, there's a lot of opportunity at WR for freshmen to step in and play.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Yeah, it seems like I'm too high on Jelks. Apparently he was running with the 2s during Spring. Sucks. I saw a lot of potential his freshman year (same with Hollins). I guess I need to get over them. lolifuwant2 wrote:The only quibbles I would have are the OLB position. I'm not sure how they end up going down, but B. Young is at the bottom on your list. I'd put him higher. Swain and Hollins haven't really done much to make me think they'll make a difference. So that's just a position which is hard to call. Any one of them could end up #1.
The other spot I think is Jelks. I just don't think he's ever going to be what we want. I think Leavitt will value space eating over Jelks' skill-set. He'll end up being a specialist coming in situationally. I don't think Jelks is an every down player. He's never proven he can be for long stretches, and he didn't look much different this spring. He is what he is.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
I knew my eyes weren't deceiving me.Phenom wrote:Yeah, it seems like I'm too high on Jelks. Apparently he was running with the 2s during Spring. Sucks. I saw a lot of potential his freshman year (same with Hollins). I guess I need to get over them. lolifuwant2 wrote:The only quibbles I would have are the OLB position. I'm not sure how they end up going down, but B. Young is at the bottom on your list. I'd put him higher. Swain and Hollins haven't really done much to make me think they'll make a difference. So that's just a position which is hard to call. Any one of them could end up #1.
The other spot I think is Jelks. I just don't think he's ever going to be what we want. I think Leavitt will value space eating over Jelks' skill-set. He'll end up being a specialist coming in situationally. I don't think Jelks is an every down player. He's never proven he can be for long stretches, and he didn't look much different this spring. He is what he is.