PAC-12 IS BACK!

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 5648
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: The Pac-12 Needs to Revote on Playing This Fall... ASAP

Post by pezsez1 »

Gavin Newsom's office is clearing the path as well!
We are close!
Willie Taggart is a dick.
GrantDuck
Senior
Posts: 2499
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:05 pm

Re: Opting back in?

Post by GrantDuck »

Would only imagine they do it if they playoff is back on play somehow.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: The Pac-12 Needs to Revote on Playing This Fall... ASAP

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Well the governors said we can play, so only now we should play!

And the governors are really only saying yes because the rest of the college football world said it's OK to play, so now the governors said it's OK to play!

Principles in this world are basically lost. Not even trying to say yay or nay to a certain governor. More just a general society issue. One second, players are locking out and demanding reform. Now they are begging to play.

Crazy world... Crazy 2020...

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Opting back in?

Post by UOducksTK1 »

GrantDuck wrote:Would only imagine they do it if they playoff is back on play somehow.
Right, and for that to happen, we'd have to start playing in October, and that's looking SLIM.

I doubt teams would want to wait into February to play the playoffs. And if Oregon doesn't start until November, that's what will happen.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35807
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: The Pac-12 Needs to Revote on Playing This Fall... ASAP

Post by greenyellow »

Still a few hurdles left but we're getting even closer. Seems the optics of the Pac-12 being the only P5 not playing finally lit a fire under some people's butts to get things going. These discussions should really have started shortly after the announcement of their partnership with Quidel for daily testing.
Image
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2198
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Opting back in?

Post by ncduck »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
GrantDuck wrote:Would only imagine they do it if they playoff is back on play somehow.
Right, and for that to happen, we'd have to start playing in October, and that's looking SLIM.

I doubt teams would want to wait into February to play the playoffs. And if Oregon doesn't start until November, that's what will happen.
Zero chance the PAC12 p[lays in October. The daily testing won't be up and running until mid-November. Once it's happening, they can start practices. The conference has been telling us it's late November at the earliest. Sorry folks.
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2198
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Opting back in?

Post by ncduck »

ncduck wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:
GrantDuck wrote:Would only imagine they do it if they playoff is back on play somehow.
Right, and for that to happen, we'd have to start playing in October, and that's looking SLIM.

I doubt teams would want to wait into February to play the playoffs. And if Oregon doesn't start until November, that's what will happen.
Zero chance the PAC12 p[lays in October. The daily testing won't be up and running until mid-November. Once it's happening, they can start practices. The conference has been telling us it's late November at the earliest. Sorry folks.
I spoke too soon. Big good news coming. Hold on tight.
maxduck
Senior
Posts: 3769
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:37 pm

Re: The Pac-12 Needs to Revote on Playing This Fall... ASAP

Post by maxduck »

UOducksTK1 wrote:Well the governors said we can play, so only now we should play!

And the governors are really only saying yes because the rest of the college football world said it's OK to play, so now the governors said it's OK to play!

Principles in this world are basically lost. Not even trying to say yay or nay to a certain governor. More just a general society issue. One second, players are locking out and demanding reform. Now they are begging to play.

Crazy world... Crazy 2020...
Maybe they got additional information, such as the what happened at other schools which have football. Maybe the new testing methods reduce the risk. I realize now it is a alien idea to get the latest data and reevaluate your position. They used to call it being an mature adult.
ducks5ever
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm

Re: The Pac-12 Needs to Revote on Playing This Fall... ASAP

Post by ducks5ever »

What a joke, the PAC-12 manages to make a fool out of itself once again. The initial decision may or may not have been right. However, literally nothing has changed since August and if anything covid may get worse as we head into the fall/winter (maybe we'll be the only conference to cancel twice?). The only thing that has changed since August is the rapid-test thing which is still a fairly new concept, but it's not like the Pac-12 schools didn't have testing capacity before August...
User avatar
Quietduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:43 pm

Re: Opting back in?

Post by Quietduck »

Turn Mario loose on the Pac 12 leadership and he will have them whipped into shape mentally and then turn the strength coaches loose on them.
rsbgduck
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Roseburg, OR
Contact:

Re: Opting back in?

Post by rsbgduck »

I figured the majority would agree that they should play. It seems like the right thing to do, however there isn't a college football fan who knows about the NCAA and there unique abilities to screw up and muddy what should be an easy solution. Thanks to those who answered the question and added their view/opinion on said question.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Opting back in?

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Rumor is late October or early November

Ncduck works for sports networks, so he would be the person to listen to in all of this
alxtw
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: Opting back in?

Post by alxtw »

Hoping pac 12 starts in late oct. so we have a shot at the CFP. Even Lawrences and fields, two top-5 locks, are playing. So I hope that changes Penei's mind and the league allows him back to play.
Everythingsducky
Senior
Posts: 2192
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: Opting back in?

Post by Everythingsducky »

alxtw wrote:Hoping pac 12 starts in late oct. so we have a shot at the CFP. Even Lawrences and fields, two top-5 locks, are playing. So I hope that changes Penei's mind and the league allows him back to play.
Penei has nothing to gain, and everything to lose. There is no school insurance policy that would come close to the guaranteed money he will get day one. Love to have him back. Not happening.
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3904
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: The Pac-12 Needs to Revote on Playing This Fall... ASAP

Post by Phalanx »

maxduck wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:Well the governors said we can play, so only now we should play!

And the governors are really only saying yes because the rest of the college football world said it's OK to play, so now the governors said it's OK to play!

Principles in this world are basically lost. Not even trying to say yay or nay to a certain governor. More just a general society issue. One second, players are locking out and demanding reform. Now they are begging to play.

Crazy world... Crazy 2020...
Maybe they got additional information, such as the what happened at other schools which have football. Maybe the new testing methods reduce the risk. I realize now it is a alien idea to get the latest data and reevaluate your position. They used to call it being an mature adult.
Riiiiight. As if these decisions weren't completely result-oriented based on revenue and the direction of the political winds.
There were 1150 COVID-related deaths in the U.S. today, the highest in the world, and roughly the same as in August the day they made the decision to cancel fall sports. Also today, Kate Brown and the Oregon Health Authority made a special exception for football to move forward. Yeah, they re-evaluated their position all right - otherwise they would lose their position.
Post Reply