|
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 5:50 pm |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?
Moderator: UOducksTK1
|
Page 13 of 13 |
[ 191 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
All Pac-12  Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 3575 
|
 Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado?Quote: --The loss of Nebraska and Colorado should have been a loss of about 16 percent to the league's revenue generating capacity. But because Colorado was an underperformer, the league lost only about 8.6 percent of its value with the loss of Nebraska, according to sources with knowledge of the Beebe Plan. http://texas.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1094038 _________________ This Never Gets Old |
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:13 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:23 pm Posts: 3353
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? wheaton4prez wrote: oregontrack wrote: blah. blah. blah. I already addressed these types of links. All they support is that there are other people that make the same assumption that you do. That would be pretty unremarkable if the Pac-10 is telling people that the Denver market is the reason for the Colorado choice so that they don't have to have a debate about excluding a school because of their religious affiliation. You haven't really provided anything new to this discussion for a few posts. So, yeah, I don't see anything left that I haven't already responded to a couple of times. We'll have to agree to disagree. LMAO, I accept your apology. _________________     
|
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:17 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12 Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 3575
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? As I pointed out, you have provided nothing demonstrating that your assumption is correct. We've been over this.
Let me know when you have something new. _________________ This Never Gets Old |
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:30 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:23 pm Posts: 3353
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? Sure I did. I've provided quotes both from within the conference itself, and those covering the expansion. I gave you an article FROM WACO that flat out admits that Baylor brings nothing to the table from a television standpoint, and that the Denver market does.
Your stubbornness is on full display right now. It's YOU that has provided nothing. LOL!! _________________
|
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:35 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12 Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 3575
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? oregontrack wrote: blah. blah. blah. We covered that multiple times too. Let me know when you have a new argument that hasn't been addressed. _________________ This Never Gets Old |
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:38 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:23 pm Posts: 3353
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? How embarrassing for you.
Checkmate has come and gone. Time to either start a new game, or you can take some time off to lick your wounds before coming back to the adult table. _________________
|
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:42 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12 Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 3575
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? oregontrack wrote: blah. blah. blah. Let me know when you have something of substance to add. _________________ This Never Gets Old |
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:43 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:23 pm Posts: 3353
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? So this is wheaton4prez in full meltdown mode, huh? I knew after you had invested so much in this the obvious end result wouldn't be pretty.
_________________
|
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:44 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12 Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 3575
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? oregontrack wrote: blah. blah. blah. Still no substance. I'll give you the last word, which you will obviously take. Others can decide for themselves whether or not it's a comment from a common forum troll. _________________ This Never Gets Old |
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:58 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:23 pm Posts: 3353
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? I will take the last word, it's part of the winner's bounty. It's nice of you to finally acknowledge your defeat like that.
Seriously, though, no need for a meltdown, friend. You were wrong about something on the internet. It happens. _________________
|
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
|
All Pac-12 Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:36 pm Posts: 3575
|
Re: Expansion w/Baylor not Colorado? Came across this article that cites some substantial information on this: http://www.omaha.com/article/20100613/B ... 12-revenue
Quote: BIG 12 2008-09 REVENUE SHARING 1. Oklahoma, $12.2 million 2. Texas, $11.8 million 3. Kansas, $11.5 million 4. Missouri, $10.4 million 5. Texas A&M, $10.2 million 6. Oklahoma State, $10.0 million 7. Colorado, $9.77 million 8. Nebraska, $9.73 million 9. Texas Tech, $9.2 million 10. Baylor, $9.1 million 11. Iowa State, $8.9 million 12. Kansas State, $8.4 million So, it looks like oregontrack guessed correctly. Colorado brought in slightly more revenue than Baylor last year. Not sure how much additional travel costs between the Texas schools and Colorado would off-set this. _________________ This Never Gets Old |
| Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:35 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 13 of 13 |
[ 191 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |