Lame is at it again
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 15960
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Lame is at it again
Not only did he try and get his players to think they were playing Alabama last week, it also turns out he so desperately wanted to make a 2pt conversion against the Tide...er, Buffs that he had the backup QB wear the punters # after the game started.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr- ... more-21315
http://www.latimes.com/sports/college/u ... 6845.story
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr- ... more-21315
http://www.latimes.com/sports/college/u ... 6845.story
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3769
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:37 pm
Re: Lame is at it again
The guy really is a piece of work. Will be interesting to see what Braveheart thinks of this.
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:46 am
Re: Lame is at it again
It's just the usual Lane shenanigans (switching Kessler's number on the extra point), and I didn't notice it until the story after the game. It's probably something he's trying to get ready for UO , but on a larger scale. As for the Alabama thing, I don't mind it. I see what he's trying to do, but I doubt anybody was geeked up like they'd be playing the no.1 team.maxduck wrote:The guy really is a piece of work. Will be interesting to see what Braveheart thinks of this.
Overall, I'm pretty ambivalent to it all.
- Bud Lee
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5540
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
- Location: Da Boot
Re: Lame is at it again
Why would you need to deceive a team that you are stomping the crap out of?
With that said, Les in the past has made his punters wear the same number, that way the receiving team wouldn't know if it was the pooch punter or the regular guy. That’s just smart play in my opinion, though 1) we do have names on the back of ours and both 2) guys are recorded in the rooster with the same number.
With that said, Les in the past has made his punters wear the same number, that way the receiving team wouldn't know if it was the pooch punter or the regular guy. That’s just smart play in my opinion, though 1) we do have names on the back of ours and both 2) guys are recorded in the rooster with the same number.
- AutzenMember
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:47 pm
- Location: Camas, WA
Re: Lame is at it again
He's actually trying to deceive his next opponent and give them something else to prepare for. Not that this would take a lot of preparation...He's a simple-minded moron.Bud Lee wrote:Why would you need to deceive a team that you are stomping the crap out of?
With that said, Les in the past has made his punters wear the same number, that way the receiving team wouldn't know if it was the pooch punter or the regular guy. That’s just smart play in my opinion, though 1) we do have names on the back of ours and both 2) guys are recorded in the rooster with the same number.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9920
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Lame is at it again
Didn't you hear? They were playing Alabama.Bud Lee wrote:Why would you need to deceive a team that you are stomping the crap out of?
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
-
- Senior
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:37 am
- Location: Keizer OR
Re: Lame is at it again
When the Ducks blow thru town, he can make believe they are playing Green Bay for all I care.Phenom wrote:Didn't you hear? They were playing Alabama.Bud Lee wrote:Why would you need to deceive a team that you are stomping the crap out of?
- Boom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5674
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
- GM: Houston Rockets
Re: Lame is at it again
I still can't believe a guy like this is the head coach at USC...
- wheaton4prez
- Senior
- Posts: 3578
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Lame is at it again
I'm hoping that more USC fans remain ambivalent to it all so that Kiffin will be the coach for another 5-10 years.Braveheart wrote:Overall, I'm pretty ambivalent to it all.