Questions Thread

You can talk about all sim related stuff here.

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

Post Reply
User avatar
pistolpetejr
Senior
Posts: 2964
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
GM: Los Angeles Clippers

Re: Questions Thread

Post by pistolpetejr »

Wiz has been MIA for over two weeks. Anyone know anything?
---
Image

PistolPeteJR
User avatar
duckyoubeavers
Sophomore
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
GM: Toronto Raptors GM

Re: Questions Thread

Post by duckyoubeavers »

pistolpetejr wrote:Wiz has been MIA for over two weeks. Anyone know anything?
typical OSU fan
Raptors GM
User avatar
duckyoubeavers
Sophomore
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
GM: Toronto Raptors GM

Re: Questions Thread

Post by duckyoubeavers »

not sure if anyone knows the answer to this.

are players more likely to accept an FA bid with more money overall or more money in year 1?
Raptors GM
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Questions Thread

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Year 1 money is most important

But definitely more likely to accept a 7 year deal compared to 2 if first year money is equal
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Questions Thread

Post by offtheheezy »

When team A trades a pick swap with team B, that pick swap is locked in between only team A and B right? Team B can’t go trade the pick swap rights with team A to team C and suddenly the swap is between team A and C? Otherwise that would just make it really bad for team A since team B can go trade pick swaps with like the best team in the league and now it went from a swap from maybe (7,10) to (7, 30)

That was my impression but wanted to make sure
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: Questions Thread

Post by vincent1469 »

The way I see it is:

If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Questions Thread

Post by offtheheezy »

vincent1469 wrote:The way I see it is:

If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
This was my impression too, the swap stays the same but you can trade your end of the swap in a separate deal but it doesn’t affect the original team you swapped with. But wanted to confirm
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4817
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Questions Thread

Post by dd10snoop28 »

vincent1469 wrote:The way I see it is:

If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
This point is moot b/c u used an unrealistic example of me and nefarious grizz doing a deal together.
Image
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5399
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: Questions Thread

Post by Zyme »

offtheheezy wrote:
vincent1469 wrote:The way I see it is:

If example Grizzlies trade swap rights with Nets where Grizzlies get the choice of the two, and Nets trade their pick to Wizards, the pick swap is still between Nets and Grizzlies just that Wizards receive the actual pick in the swap if that makes sense. Like the conditions are still the same just a different team has ownership of the pick.
This was my impression too, the swap stays the same but you can trade your end of the swap in a separate deal but it doesn’t affect the original team you swapped with. But wanted to confirm
The only times I see it as bad is if the team accepting the swap option pick isnt on board with the conditional deal, can turn into a buyer beware
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Questions Thread

Post by offtheheezy »

Not targeting any trades since I saw multiple instances of this being ok, but is the rule listed here: https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... 25&t=17264 where no more than 2 FA fillers can be used in a trade actually a rule / enforced?
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5399
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: Questions Thread

Post by Zyme »

offtheheezy wrote:Not targeting any trades since I saw multiple instances of this being ok, but is the rule listed here: https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... 25&t=17264 where no more than 2 FA fillers can be used in a trade actually a rule / enforced?
That seems like a vestigial rule, if you have the room (cap and roster spots) why should it matter?
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Questions Thread

Post by offtheheezy »

Zyme wrote:
offtheheezy wrote:Not targeting any trades since I saw multiple instances of this being ok, but is the rule listed here: https://ducksattack.com/forum/viewtopic ... 25&t=17264 where no more than 2 FA fillers can be used in a trade actually a rule / enforced?
That seems like a vestigial rule, if you have the room (cap and roster spots) why should it matter?
What I assumed, just wanted to check bc I was curious haha
Post Reply