League Update

[Oregon Ownage]

It was brought up in the trade discussion thread that some DC's have not been entered. I went through team by team and the teams who need to input a DC are:

Nets (Administration)
Bullets
Hornets
Bucks
Spurs
Grizzlies
Warriors (Administration)
SuperSonics (Administration)

The teams not in administration, you are required to input a DC in by the end of Saturday, if not then you will face a penalty. As for the teams in administration, I will put up their CPU DC's.

Moving forward this will be a point of emphasis before the season starts

[dave]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

[Marzeial]

Makes sense to me. Should definitely be enforced

[Oregon Ownage]

Added Spurs, missed them on initial review

[Mobruler]

Putting in a depth chart should not be the barometer for activity.

[Oregon Ownage]

Putting in a depth chart should not be the barometer for activity.

Its been a rule since day 1 of this league. Its not used as a measure of activity. In the grand scheme of things, it is easiest thing to do

[Mobruler]

Putting in a depth chart should not be the barometer for activity.

Its been a rule since day 1 of this league. Its not used as a measure of activity. In the grand scheme of things, it is easiest thing to do

If not used to measure activity, why is it so important?

[Oregon Ownage]

Putting in a depth chart should not be the barometer for activity.

Its been a rule since day 1 of this league. Its not used as a measure of activity. In the grand scheme of things, it is easiest thing to do

If not used to measure activity, why is it so important?

Bc we established day 1 that you were not to use the CPU DC. Thats why

[Mobruler]

Don't appreciate you being a dick, man. I'm legitimately asking why.

[dave]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

No thoughts on positive encouragement instead of negative punishment?

Penalizing a non-active team isn't going to make them more active. Rewarding active GMs will only make them more interested and active.

[Oregon Ownage]

Don't appreciate you being a dick, man. I'm legitimately asking why.

Im not being a dick, I just told you above why you have to enter a DC

[Mobruler]

Don't appreciate you being a dick, man. I'm legitimately asking why.

Im not being a dick, I just told you above why you have to enter a DC

Bro.. nevermind..

[Oregon Ownage]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

No thoughts on positive encouragement instead of negative punishment?

Penalizing a non-active team isn't going to make them more active. Rewarding active GMs will only make them more interested and active.

Rewarding for doing what your supposed to do?

[bellsduck]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

No thoughts on positive encouragement instead of negative punishment?

Penalizing a non-active team isn't going to make them more active. Rewarding active GMs will only make them more interested and active.

Rewarding for doing what your supposed to do?

Yes because as we've all seen over 15 plus seasons there is never an effective punishment. Random rewards for teams following the rules seems to work and excites people.

[dave]

How about rewarding the GMs who have been active? Maybe some incentive will increase activity.

No thoughts on positive encouragement instead of negative punishment?

Penalizing a non-active team isn't going to make them more active. Rewarding active GMs will only make them more interested and active.

Rewarding for doing what your supposed to do?

Exactly. This isn't the no fun zone is it?

It's a healthy stimulus