Fire Allioti

MFRDuckFan · Post by **MFRDuckFan** » Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:18 pm

Video from Nick after the game.

http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindducksb ... coord.html

gofightingducks · Post by **gofightingducks** » Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:25 pm

MFRDuckFan wrote:Video from Nick after the game.

http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindducksb ... coord.html

I like it that he says the blame starts with him, so at least he is owning up to not putting together a good game plan. Both he and Kelly said the D practiced as well as they have all season this week, that they were focused.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:14 pm

Let's just be thankful that it's taken 9 games for Aliotti's defense to be exposed. That's easily the most dominant stretch of football I've seen him coach since 94 (or perhaps ever!).

Props to him for that. Now let's just hope Chip fixes the problem for NA lol.

duckgrad99 · Post by **duckgrad99** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:42 pm

If the ducks fail to make the rose bowl, Allioti needs to go. No defense at all.

duckgrad99 · Post by **duckgrad99** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:12 pm

Enough said.

gofightingducks · Post by **gofightingducks** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:16 pm

Teach the team to tackle

Post by **dthomas=ddixon** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:29 pm

The problem isn't so much the scheme, its more that we just CANNOT tackle. There's 1-2 missed tackles every play. We just don't wrap up. It blows my mind. Wrap up the dudes legs!!! Enough of the flying shoulder hits!

spinseeker · Post by **spinseeker** » Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:59 pm

They do way to much trying to strip the ball and not enough wrapping up. I think this is Chips influence. It's great when we get turnovers (see the first seven games), hard to watch when we don't. It seems like one solid effort at a strip, then tackle is probably the plan. But I notice as the games get tighter and they get more desperate, they give up a lot more yards trying to strip all the way down the field.

duckgrad99 · Post by **duckgrad99** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:11 am

I still think Allioti gets way too much credit. He had a month to prepare for Pryor. The offense bailed him out this season..........again. I have never seen another college team continue to do so poor on 3rd and long as the ducks have been.

Duck07 · Post by **Duck07** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:59 am

well, if you look at past comments the same things are happening.

poor tacklings, same poor blitz techniques, more poor tackling, db's on islands 9 yards off the ball, poor pursuit angles.

yes, ohio state's defense played well, but this is why you have to be a complete football team. and as far as the TOP, i've always felt that if you have a great defense, that you'll just force the other team to go 3 and out all the time. Its just a built in excuse that nick uses because his schemes are 15 years old.

sepdxsnwbrdr · Post by **sepdxsnwbrdr** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:08 am

This sword is double-edged.

If you fire Alliotti you lose our best recruiter(Neal and Campbell are close behind) and all of his connections in Los Angeles.

As far as defensive schemes go...I would hire Wilcox. However, I just can't see him pulling in the recruits from SoCal. Thoughts?

Boom · Post by **Boom** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:19 am

Defense played well enough to win yesterday

duckgrad99 · Post by **duckgrad99** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:28 am

Boom wrote:Defense played well enough to win yesterday

Disagree. Look at what Pryor did. The tackling was terrible. Ohio State converted on several key 3rd down plays. Just because the offense stunk, doesn't mean the defense played well.

hjpop · Post by **hjpop** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:50 am

The defense held an otherwise running/throwing Offense like OSU to 26 points. Don't care how many yards they gave up, that's 26 points. D didn't turn the ball over twice, D didn't misread the DL, D didn't keep turning the ball back to OSU. The first half stats for TOP was shocking, even for UO. 22 minutes to 8? They took 8:05 minutes off the clock and kept Oregon's O on the sidelines at one point. That's just asking for too much. Fire Allioti? Why? One moment, we're all singing his praises and the next calling for his head? He just got outgamed, which happens. If we sucked completely, ala Everyone-else-in-Pac-10-this-bowl-season, that's one thing. We didn't, the D played good, and we move on from here.

duckgrad99 · Post by **duckgrad99** » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:00 pm

hjpop wrote:The defense held an otherwise running/throwing Offense like OSU to 26 points. Don't care how many yards they gave up, that's 26 points. D didn't turn the ball over twice, D didn't misread the DL, D didn't keep turning the ball back to OSU. The first half stats for TOP was shocking, even for UO. 22 minutes to 8? They took 8:05 minutes off the clock and kept Oregon's O on the sidelines at one point. That's just asking for too much. Fire Allioti? Why? One moment, we're all singing his praises and the next calling for his head? He just got outgamed, which happens. If we sucked completely, ala Everyone-else-in-Pac-10-this-bowl-season, that's one thing. We didn't, the D played good, and we move on from here.

26 points isn't anything special, especially after what Ohio State did offensively during the regular season. And how many people are singing his praises? Once again, if not for our high powered offense, Allioti would be exposed. The defense was also lousy against Oregon State, Arizona, Stanford, Purdue, etc. Again, the offense wasn't any better yesterday, but I believe that a top notch defense is the one thing preventing Oregon from being a national championship team.

Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti

Re: Fire Allioti