Page 2 of 2
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:45 pm
by buckmarkduck
I don't think Judson is a RB, move he and Lovette to the slot with Lovette ahead of Nelson.
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 4:14 pm
by Phenom
buckmarkduck wrote:I don't think Judson is a RB, move he and Lovette to the slot with Lovette ahead of Nelson.
You think Judson can play in the slot? His body seems more suited for RB. I agree that Lovette is a slot receiver but we have so many options there already and I saw that he played a little outside this spring. You think he starts ahead of Nelson? Woah. Is Nelson's attitude that bad?
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 4:19 pm
by UOducksTK1
With Ofodile hurt, there's a lot of opportunity at WR for freshmen to step in and play.
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 4:19 pm
by Phenom
UOducksTK1 wrote:With Ofodile hurt, there's a lot of opportunity at WR for freshmen to step in and play.
How long is he out for?
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 4:56 pm
by buckmarkduck
Phenom wrote:buckmarkduck wrote:I don't think Judson is a RB, move he and Lovette to the slot with Lovette ahead of Nelson.
You think Judson can play in the slot? His body seems more suited for RB. I agree that Lovette is a slot receiver but we have so many options there already and I saw that he played a little outside this spring. You think he starts ahead of Nelson? Woah. Is Nelson's attitude that bad?
From all indications Lovette was playing the same spot as Nelson all spring, and honestly outperformed him most of the time. Judson is a different thing, I've been told he was recruited as a slot/RB, but I don't know if he ever even sees the field at either spot. He has a lot of work to do in the weight room and also needs to work on his speed.
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 7:59 pm
by odux
Wait, I thought Mattingly was a TE now? Per sources of course.
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 12:11 am
by Groundswell
odux wrote:Wait, I thought Mattingly was a TE now? Per sources of course.
Nope, just the bottom of the LB depth chart same as always.
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 12:20 am
by Groundswell
The only quibbles I would have are the OLB position. I'm not sure how they end up going down, but B. Young is at the bottom on your list. I'd put him higher. Swain and Hollins haven't really done much to make me think they'll make a difference. So that's just a position which is hard to call. Any one of them could end up #1.
The other spot I think is Jelks. I just don't think he's ever going to be what we want. I think Leavitt will value space eating over Jelks' skill-set. He'll end up being a specialist coming in situationally. I don't think Jelks is an every down player. He's never proven he can be for long stretches, and he didn't look much different this spring. He is what he is.
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 10:16 am
by UOducksTK1
Phenom wrote:UOducksTK1 wrote:With Ofodile hurt, there's a lot of opportunity at WR for freshmen to step in and play.
How long is he out for?
Unknown, but he's already been out a couple months, so not good for him.
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Wed May 10, 2017 11:12 am
by Phenom
ifuwant2 wrote:The only quibbles I would have are the OLB position. I'm not sure how they end up going down, but B. Young is at the bottom on your list. I'd put him higher. Swain and Hollins haven't really done much to make me think they'll make a difference. So that's just a position which is hard to call. Any one of them could end up #1.
The other spot I think is Jelks. I just don't think he's ever going to be what we want. I think Leavitt will value space eating over Jelks' skill-set. He'll end up being a specialist coming in situationally. I don't think Jelks is an every down player. He's never proven he can be for long stretches, and he didn't look much different this spring. He is what he is.
Yeah, it seems like I'm too high on Jelks. Apparently he was running with the 2s during Spring. Sucks. I saw a lot of potential his freshman year (same with Hollins). I guess I need to get over them. lol
Re: '17 Projected Depth Chart (v. Post-Spring)
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 11:44 pm
by Phenom
Phenom wrote:ifuwant2 wrote:The only quibbles I would have are the OLB position. I'm not sure how they end up going down, but B. Young is at the bottom on your list. I'd put him higher. Swain and Hollins haven't really done much to make me think they'll make a difference. So that's just a position which is hard to call. Any one of them could end up #1.
The other spot I think is Jelks. I just don't think he's ever going to be what we want. I think Leavitt will value space eating over Jelks' skill-set. He'll end up being a specialist coming in situationally. I don't think Jelks is an every down player. He's never proven he can be for long stretches, and he didn't look much different this spring. He is what he is.
Yeah, it seems like I'm too high on Jelks. Apparently he was running with the 2s during Spring. Sucks. I saw a lot of potential his freshman year (same with Hollins). I guess I need to get over them. lol
I knew my eyes weren't deceiving me.