The first two firsts probably don't mean much. But a lot of West teams are rebuilding or on their way up. And Houston is now old.
So those 88 and 89 1sts could be nice pieces for Jazz.
I would have at least protected the 90 1st if I was the Rockets. That was a mistake.
Rockets - Jazz
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37589
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Rockets - Jazz
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Rockets - Jazz
Processedbellsduck wrote:No doesn't matterBoom wrote:I have an in season MLE I’d like to use. Not sure if Bellsduck is particular on who to use it on.Oregon Ownage wrote:Salaries work without Buckner, when Buckner is added it does not work.Boom wrote:Jon Koncak
A.C. Green
Steve Harris
Charles Bradley
Rockets 86, 87, 88, 89 1st round picks
For
Parish
Buckner
I have processed without Buckner so if you want him, it will have to be in a separate deal.
Future picks have been added to futures thread.
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: Rockets - Jazz
Just saw that too, Ownage must have missed adding him inofftheheezy wrote:Koncak also still on the Rockets?
Hornets GM
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: Rockets - Jazz
Good catch, completely missed thatCellar-door wrote:Just saw that too, Ownage must have missed adding him inofftheheezy wrote:Koncak also still on the Rockets?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 3547
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
- GM: Utah Jazz
Re: Rockets - Jazz
Duh. Me too.
I set my lineup and totally spaced on him.
I set my lineup and totally spaced on him.
- Boom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5674
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
- GM: Houston Rockets
Re: Rockets - Jazz
Maybe I overspent, but I think Parish would have to retire and Dantley would have to fall off a cliff for my team to miss the playoffs.UOducksTK1 wrote:The first two firsts probably don't mean much. But a lot of West teams are rebuilding or on their way up. And Houston is now old.
So those 88 and 89 1sts could be nice pieces for Jazz.
I would have at least protected the 90 1st if I was the Rockets. That was a mistake.
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37589
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Rockets - Jazz
Perhaps that's true. Still nice move by Jazz. And it's possible Parish and Dantley deprecate significantly in 4 years.Boom wrote:Maybe I overspent, but I think Parish would have to retire and Dantley would have to fall off a cliff for my team to miss the playoffs.UOducksTK1 wrote:The first two firsts probably don't mean much. But a lot of West teams are rebuilding or on their way up. And Houston is now old.
So those 88 and 89 1sts could be nice pieces for Jazz.
I would have at least protected the 90 1st if I was the Rockets. That was a mistake.
Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13