1987 Draft Discussion

dd10snoop28 · Post by **dd10snoop28** » Mon May 03, 2021 1:43 pm

5 guys left that I want on my list.... hoping one is leftover at 28.

Oregon Ownage · Post by **Oregon Ownage** » Mon May 03, 2021 1:45 pm

Files have been updated

dennocj · Post by **dennocj** » Mon May 03, 2021 2:00 pm

Was trying to trade up for Jackson just for him to fall into my lap. Hopefully he will pan out.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Mon May 03, 2021 2:01 pm

Jackson was like 8th on my board. Great value

offtheheezy · Post by **offtheheezy** » Mon May 03, 2021 2:11 pm

Yeah definitely like Jackson

Cellar-door · Post by **Cellar-door** » Mon May 03, 2021 2:20 pm

dennocj wrote:Was trying to trade up for Jackson just for him to fall into my lap. Hopefully he will pan out.

I was looking at trading above you... I would have taken Jackson.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Mon May 03, 2021 4:51 pm

Oregon Ownage wrote:
DrBradBuss wrote:I don't remember seeing "Elite" potential before.
Is that a new term?
Top end in terms of potential

It gets boring using the same lingo so changing it up some

Do we have an unofficial ranking of the terminology?

Would elite be above 'Amazing', or or above 'Amazing raw'?

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Mon May 03, 2021 4:51 pm

Cellar-door wrote:
dennocj wrote:Was trying to trade up for Jackson just for him to fall into my lap. Hopefully he will pan out.
I was looking at trading above you... I would have taken Jackson.

Same, I offered probably 3 different teams.

jibbajabba614 · Post by **jibbajabba614** » Mon May 03, 2021 6:25 pm

Yeah Pacers looking good

offtheheezy · Post by **offtheheezy** » Mon May 03, 2021 6:29 pm

Almost took Cadillac Anderson at 18 - but I had too many offense-only big men, but think he's a great pick

JayGreen · Post by **JayGreen** » Mon May 03, 2021 6:51 pm

offtheheezy wrote:Almost took Cadillac Anderson at 18 - but I had too many offense-only big men, but think he's a great pick

I have Salley who looks to be a good defender and shot blocker, so figured I’d take an offensive big. Hoping for a couple good TC’s to get cadillacs rebounding and defense in the B range.

bellsduck · Post by **bellsduck** » Mon May 03, 2021 8:16 pm

lukeyrid13 wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:
DrBradBuss wrote:I don't remember seeing "Elite" potential before.
Is that a new term?
Top end in terms of potential

It gets boring using the same lingo so changing it up some
Do we have an unofficial ranking of the terminology?

Would elite be above 'Amazing', or or above 'Amazing raw'?

This is a great question.
I would've said in this order,
Amazing Raw
Amazing
Elite
Great
Very Good
Good
Solid
Above Average
Average
Limited
Not Much

jibbajabba614 · Post by **jibbajabba614** » Mon May 03, 2021 8:40 pm

bellsduck wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:
Oregon Ownage wrote:
DrBradBuss wrote:I don't remember seeing "Elite" potential before.
Is that a new term?
Top end in terms of potential

It gets boring using the same lingo so changing it up some
Do we have an unofficial ranking of the terminology?

Would elite be above 'Amazing', or or above 'Amazing raw'?

This is a great question.
I would've said in this order,
Amazing Raw
Amazing
Elite
Great
Very Good
Good
Solid
Above Average
Average
Limited
Not Much

Amazing raw potential means more loaded on strength, quickness and jumping department. Say u give someone 80 quickness, jumping and strength, ratings look good but they meant not sim well. If they continue to improve over time meaning they don’t lose their potential their ratings could look great. I’m pretty sure I’ve said this before. I usually won’t go below 35 on potential. 35-45 limited. 45-60 solid. 60-75 good. Great 75-85. Amazing is anything over 85. 88 is usually my go to. But I give top guys 90-100 range

jibbajabba614 · Post by **jibbajabba614** » Mon May 03, 2021 8:41 pm

Spell check is killing me this week

Cellar-door · Post by **Cellar-door** » Mon May 03, 2021 9:02 pm

I think generally Amazing potential guys tend to turn out more often than Amazing raw potential.

1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion

Re: 1987 Draft Discussion