Top 40 Trade Value

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Top 40 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Screen Shot 2021-05-16 at 1.02.30 AM.png
Screen Shot 2021-05-16 at 1.03.45 AM.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
offtheheezy
Senior
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
GM: Vancouver Grizzlies

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by offtheheezy »

This is a fun series - I think your recent FA experiences have you penalizing expiring contracts too much though :lol:. Would take Jordan 1st even as an expiring just due to age.

Thanks for the article!
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 37685
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by UOducksTK1 »

My whole team almost dropped out of the rankings, haha

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

offtheheezy wrote:This is a fun series - I think your recent FA experiences have you penalizing expiring contracts too much though :lol:. Would take Jordan 1st even as an expiring just due to age.

Thanks for the article!
Well I certainly wouldn't trade him for the guy who is ranked 2nd. I think Robinson as a rookie probably true does have more value. Moses is getting up there in age, so true value, MJ is higher. But Moses is at least locked in while MJ is not.
User avatar
The Bean Regime
Senior
Posts: 2644
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by The Bean Regime »

Timberwolves finally made an article! Suck it losers! :lol:

Curious to see if Bias can reclaim a spot next time. Hasn't taken much of a leap forward from last season but he's still quite good and is only a sophomore.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

UOducksTK1 wrote:My whole team almost dropped out of the rankings, haha

Really rough start for your guys this season. Perkins seems to have stagnated and is now expiring. Benjamin I think declined a bit. Scott is and will be good, he's still top 20 with some absolute studs. You added McHale who is good....but 25 teams wouldn't even want him so his trade value doesn't reflect his on court production.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

The Bean Regime wrote:Timberwolves finally made an article! Suck it losers! :lol:

Curious to see if Bias can reclaim a spot next time. Hasn't taken much of a leap forward from last season but he's still quite good and is only a sophomore.
I did drop it from a top 50 to a top 40 so that affects it a bit.

But Bias appears to be a 1 dimensional player as an inside scorer but doesn't provide other valuable tools to his game. He could still blow up and become a 22-25ppg game similar to like an Adrian Dantley but didn't show much progress from year 1 to year 2.
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4817
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.
Image
User avatar
the goat
Freshman
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:40 pm
GM: Los Angeles Lakers

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by the goat »

The three ball is hot right now, but beefy big men still reign supreme... I'd go

1. Moses
1A. Sampson/ Hakeem/ JBC
2. Tarpley / Admiral
Last edited by the goat on Sun May 16, 2021 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lakers GM
User avatar
Foxyg1396
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1041
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:27 pm
GM: Denver Nuggets

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by Foxyg1396 »

the goat wrote:1. Moses
1A. Sampson/ Hakeem/ JBC
2. Tarpley / Admiral
That’s an interesting take on things for sure.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

dd10snoop28 wrote:Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.
You wouldn't trade him for rookie Mark Jackson?
User avatar
Craig
Senior
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
GM: Phoenix Suns GM

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by Craig »

lukeyrid13 wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.
You wouldn't trade him for rookie Mark Jackson?
Are we sure he shouldn't be on par with Wood? Could be small sample size but Jordan looks legit.
SUNS GM
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.
You wouldn't trade him for rookie Mark Jackson?
Are we sure he shouldn't be on par with Wood? Could be small sample size but Jordan looks legit.
Since Jordan has been in the league for several years now, I didn't realize he was still only 22. He has C potential, but he is pretty stinking good.

He's only 5'8 as well, but at 207 pounds and C- rebounding, he's not as deficient as most small PG are.
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Post your preferences
Image
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Ken Barlow
Inside scoring
Strength

Michael Jordan
Strength
Post Reply