Continued Conference Realignment

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 5394
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Continued Conference Realignment

Post by StevensTechU »

Rumors swirling that Oklahoma and Texas are looking to leave the Big 12 for the SEC. That would put the SEC at 18 teams.

The Big 12 would have 8 teams left, with very little cache remaining among any of the schools that remain. Biggest brand left is.. TCU? Okie State? Yikes.
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7998
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by karlhungis »

Seems like a strange move. It has to be a financial decision but my understanding was that both Texas and Oklahoma are doing just fine financially. This move will make it more difficult for the programs to win and make the path to the title much harder than it would have been if they remained in their current conference.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Texas denied the Pac-16 because they wanted to be the clear top dog (yet haven't won the conference since 09 now!) and get the Longhorn Network. They got their own network and the Big12 kowtowed to their every want....and then they just want to follow in the footsteps of Texas AM and shake up the entire college football landscape again.

Cool.
Eksynyt
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:33 am

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by Eksynyt »

This will almost assuredly compel the Pac12 to expand. Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, Kansas & Kansas State.

Would be a very good basketball conference with 2 blue bloods.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10573
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by buckmarkduck »

lukeyrid13 wrote:Texas denied the Pac-16 because they wanted to be the clear top dog (yet haven't won the conference since 09 now!) and get the Longhorn Network. They got their own network and the Big12 kowtowed to their every want....and then they just want to follow in the footsteps of Texas AM and shake up the entire college football landscape again.

Cool.

Not totally true. CU and UU blocked Texas and OU.
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3904
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by Phalanx »

I don't know why the Pac 12 would let schools from Texas and Kansas in when everyone knows they would eventually leave in a future realignment anyway. Nobody cares about basketball except for briefly in March, and with the possible exception of OK State, they don't add anything in football.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Phalanx wrote:I don't know why the Pac 12 would let schools from Texas and Kansas in when everyone knows they would eventually leave in a future realignment anyway. Nobody cares about basketball except for briefly in March, and with the possible exception of OK State, they don't add anything in football.
I think assumption would be trying to keep up with the Jones' on "needing" a 16 team conference.

Will be interesting what if any affect this would have on the 12 team playoff.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 5394
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by StevensTechU »

Recency of football wins should be way down the list of most important items to consider here. If I'm a decision maker, the biggest considerations are brand size/marketability (this directly translates into TV dollars, which is the lifeblood of college athletics) and local talent, as that is second only to money in determining sustained success.

So with that, I would add Houston, TCU or SMU (probably not both, but one gives you presence in the Dallas market), and OkSU. I would put out a feeler with Nebraska, and if it's a no, my 4th is either UNLV or Texas Tech.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10573
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by buckmarkduck »

Any religious institutions will be a instant no go for left coast presidents. So then youre left with OK State, TTU, Houston and UNLV. Not bad, but also not moving the needle.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by lukeyrid13 »

buckmarkduck wrote:Any religious institutions will be a instant no go for left coast presidents. So then youre left with OK State, TTU, Houston and UNLV. Not bad, but also not moving the needle.
Very "open minded" of them.
Everythingsducky
Senior
Posts: 2192
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by Everythingsducky »

Isn’t the conference caveat, a school has to be a ‘research’ university? The market size is a huge part of it (unless the school is in the SEC). Two reasons Boise State wouldn’t be invited?
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 5394
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by StevensTechU »

I think the market size thing is extremely misunderstood. People seem to be associating it with population of the town the college is in, which is totally inaccurate. It's "how many fans or potential fans do you have?" Notre Dame is in BFE, but is one of the biggest brands in the country. Such outsized marketability that they have their own TV deal. Most people couldn't tell you Fordham's mascot, on the other hand.

Iowa State is a terrible option because they're the second biggest brand in the state of f'ing Iowa. Despite their recent success, they do nothing to move the needle for a TV deal.

Alabama has more fans than UCLA because they have rabid dedication from non-alumni and alumni alike. At UCLA, they hardly care, in all actuality.

Think of market as # of people who will tune in on TV and show up to sit their asses in seats at the home stadium. It's that, not college town population.
User avatar
OregonFan4Life
All-American
Posts: 12369
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by OregonFan4Life »

247Sports reporting Texas and Oklahoma are leaving the Big 12, no mention of what conference they’re joining but everything points to the SEC. Will this only strengthen the SEC bias or not have any impact on it?
Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10573
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by buckmarkduck »

At some point Miss St, ole Miss and Arkansas have to get sick of being the sisters of the poor in the SEC. all 3 would be top tier teams in the Big 12 without OU and Texas.
ducks5ever
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm

Re: Continued Conference Realignment

Post by ducks5ever »

Well isn't that nice. All the Pac-12 haters might finally leave us alone for a while since we're no longer the worst conference in CFB lol. When's the last time there was a major football conference that didn't have any bluebloods in it?
Post Reply