Exactly.jBeavertonduck wrote:Any news on if Chris Peterson would be interested?
I think our targets should go in the following order:
(1) Peterson
(2) Chris Peterson
(3) Chrissy P
(4) Chip
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
Exactly.jBeavertonduck wrote:Any news on if Chris Peterson would be interested?
dd10snoop28 wrote:Exactly.jBeavertonduck wrote:Any news on if Chris Peterson would be interested?
I think our targets should go in the following order:
(1) Peterson
(2) Chris Peterson
(3) Chrissy P
(4) Chip
I like the way you think... Should B-Mac provide a startlingly innovative and effective approach for the Bowl game, he might move up the list quite a bit. Almost like an on the job interview, eh?StevensTechU wrote:Tetairoa McMilan (Oregon's 5* WR commit) and 4* Jahlil Florence both went on Instagram to say "Please don't hire Chip." So there's that.
I've only read the last three pages of this, but I would look at: Dave Aranda, Chris Petersen, Andy Avalos, Pete Kwiatkowski, Josh Heupel, and internally at Bryan McClendon. That would be my interview group, with perhaps a surprise or two who show up out of the blue.
You are getting pretty defensive so I hope you aren't one of the ones that defended Willie's hire. No, I will not get off it until Mullen's hires someone that is on Oregon's level not some cast off. I took a lot of heat for saying the obvious about Willie and it was actually worse than I thought because I thought a random South Florida dude would at least stay loyal to a team way above his pay grade.Duck07 wrote:Holy hell get off of that already. Look at the entirety of hires that Rob Mullens has made, hes legitimately one of the Top ADs in the country and worth an extension. He also isn't going to hire someone that Uncle Phil doesn't sign off on for football either.duck023 wrote:Willie Taggert was the worst hire in the history of coaches hired. The AD isn't off the hook for that and the fact that you defended the AD for no reason sort of tells me you are one of the ones that wanted Taggert.DuckMastaFunk wrote:I am very, very glad that most of you guys aren’t our AD.
I'm reminded of the fact that Chips success was when the current players and recruits were what, 7-11 years old? They remember Oregon the school and The Duck more than they remember the coach. We remember the coach because we're adults but all they really know of Chip is someone who hasn't lived up to expectations and that's primarily how he's been talked about.woundedknees wrote:I like the way you think... Should B-Mac provide a startlingly innovative and effective approach for the Bowl game, he might move up the list quite a bit. Almost like an on the job interview, eh?StevensTechU wrote:Tetairoa McMilan (Oregon's 5* WR commit) and 4* Jahlil Florence both went on Instagram to say "Please don't hire Chip." So there's that.
I've only read the last three pages of this, but I would look at: Dave Aranda, Chris Petersen, Andy Avalos, Pete Kwiatkowski, Josh Heupel, and internally at Bryan McClendon. That would be my interview group, with perhaps a surprise or two who show up out of the blue.
We also lost to a s*** Stanford team and let Arizona stick around for most of the game. You know, the Arizona that most considered the literal worst team in all of FBS this year. And LSU was s*** this year and ended up firing their coach. These are some terrible arguments.duck023 wrote:I didn't ignore UCLA beating LSU which is something Oregon couldn't do. I'm also not ignoring the fact UCLA almost beat Oregon this year.UofO8 wrote:Holy s*** am I glad Oregon fans have zero say in the coaching search lmao. The amount of people I have seen yelling for Chip to come back is fucking baffling. It's like they have ignored UCLA football for the last 4 yearsdd10snoop28 wrote:Chiiiiip!
I mean, regardless you should get off it because even though he was bad, saying he was the "worst hire in the history of coaches hired" is one of the dumbest hyperbolic statements I have seen in a while lolduck023 wrote:You are getting pretty defensive so I hope you aren't one of the ones that defended Willie's hire. No, I will not get off it until Mullen's hires someone that is on Oregon's level not some cast off. I took a lot of heat for saying the obvious about Willie and it was actually worse than I thought because I thought a random South Florida dude would at least stay loyal to a team way above his pay grade.Duck07 wrote:Holy hell get off of that already. Look at the entirety of hires that Rob Mullens has made, hes legitimately one of the Top ADs in the country and worth an extension. He also isn't going to hire someone that Uncle Phil doesn't sign off on for football either.duck023 wrote:Willie Taggert was the worst hire in the history of coaches hired. The AD isn't off the hook for that and the fact that you defended the AD for no reason sort of tells me you are one of the ones that wanted Taggert.DuckMastaFunk wrote:I am very, very glad that most of you guys aren’t our AD.
I have a lot of respect for LSU. Even on a down year they have elite talent. It's sort of like when Oregon beat USC on the road in 2010. They were a 6-6 team but they were better than that talent wise. I'm just saying that Chip's UCLA team wasn't much worse than Oregon's Cristobal team. In fact Oregon was saved by an interception against UCLA. Who knows how bad Oregon falls if Oregon loses to UCLA.UofO8 wrote:We also lost to a s*** Stanford team and let Arizona stick around for most of the game. You know, the Arizona that most considered the literal worst team in all of FBS this year. And LSU was s*** this year and ended up firing their coach. These are some terrible arguments.duck023 wrote:I didn't ignore UCLA beating LSU which is something Oregon couldn't do. I'm also not ignoring the fact UCLA almost beat Oregon this year.UofO8 wrote:Holy s*** am I glad Oregon fans have zero say in the coaching search lmao. The amount of people I have seen yelling for Chip to come back is fucking baffling. It's like they have ignored UCLA football for the last 4 yearsdd10snoop28 wrote:Chiiiiip!
No I think I'm pretty accurate. There has been a lot of bad coaches but there has never been a bad coach that had a bad year and thought he was successful enough to leave for his dream job.UofO8 wrote:I mean, regardless you should get off it because even though he was bad, saying he was the "worst hire in the history of coaches hired" is one of the dumbest hyperbolic statements I have seen in a while lolduck023 wrote:You are getting pretty defensive so I hope you aren't one of the ones that defended Willie's hire. No, I will not get off it until Mullen's hires someone that is on Oregon's level not some cast off. I took a lot of heat for saying the obvious about Willie and it was actually worse than I thought because I thought a random South Florida dude would at least stay loyal to a team way above his pay grade.Duck07 wrote:Holy hell get off of that already. Look at the entirety of hires that Rob Mullens has made, hes legitimately one of the Top ADs in the country and worth an extension. He also isn't going to hire someone that Uncle Phil doesn't sign off on for football either.duck023 wrote:Willie Taggert was the worst hire in the history of coaches hired. The AD isn't off the hook for that and the fact that you defended the AD for no reason sort of tells me you are one of the ones that wanted Taggert.DuckMastaFunk wrote:I am very, very glad that most of you guys aren’t our AD.
You weren't even a poster when Taggart was hired, nobody cares what you thought about his hire.duck023 wrote:No I think I'm pretty accurate. There has been a lot of bad coaches but there has never been a bad coach that had a bad year and thought he was successful enough to leave for his dream job.
That’s actually hilarious recruits are opening campaigning against Chip ha.StevensTechU wrote:Tetairoa McMilan (Oregon's 5* WR commit) and 4* Jahlil Florence both went on Instagram to say "Please don't hire Chip." So there's that.
I've only read the last three pages of this, but I would look at: Dave Aranda, Chris Petersen, Andy Avalos, Pete Kwiatkowski, Josh Heupel, and internally at Bryan McClendon. That would be my interview group, with perhaps a surprise or two who show up out of the blue.