Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35683
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by greenyellow »

Oregon has gotten yet another DL transfer from Nebraska, this time DL Casey Rogers.
Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10565
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by buckmarkduck »

Now we need a LT.
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7998
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by karlhungis »

buckmarkduck wrote:Now we need a LT.
We do? I thought our line was in decent shape.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10565
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by buckmarkduck »

karlhungis wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Now we need a LT.
We do? I thought our line was in decent shape.

They are ok, but we don’t have a lot of depth and I feel like a ventral LT would go a long ways in making this like really good.
jimmy12
Senior
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by jimmy12 »

buckmarkduck wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Now we need a LT.
We do? I thought our line was in decent shape.

They are ok, but we don’t have a lot of depth and I feel like a ventral LT would go a long ways in making this like really good.

See Josh Conerly number 1 Tack in this year's class...

We are fine on OL.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10565
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by buckmarkduck »

jimmy12 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Now we need a LT.
We do? I thought our line was in decent shape.

They are ok, but we don’t have a lot of depth and I feel like a ventral LT would go a long ways in making this like really good.

See Josh Conerly number 1 Tack in this year's class...

We are fine on OL.
Our OL had some horrible games last year. Fine isn’t a word I would use. And counting on a HS kid to be the LT, is risky.
jimmy12
Senior
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by jimmy12 »

buckmarkduck wrote:
jimmy12 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Now we need a LT.
We do? I thought our line was in decent shape.

They are ok, but we don’t have a lot of depth and I feel like a ventral LT would go a long ways in making this like really good.

See Josh Conerly number 1 Tack in this year's class...

We are fine on OL.
Our OL had some horrible games last year. Fine isn’t a word I would use. And counting on a HS kid to be the LT, is risky.
See Penei
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10565
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by buckmarkduck »

jimmy12 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
jimmy12 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Now we need a LT.
We do? I thought our line was in decent shape.

They are ok, but we don’t have a lot of depth and I feel like a ventral LT would go a long ways in making this like really good.

See Josh Conerly number 1 Tack in this year's class...

We are fine on OL.
Our OL had some horrible games last year. Fine isn’t a word I would use. And counting on a HS kid to be the LT, is risky.
See Penei
1 guy in 100 years of UO football? See Utah and Stanford eating our OL lunch, even UA and Cal made them look bad at times. They are average. Hopefully Klemm gets them to play hard every game.
jimmy12
Senior
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by jimmy12 »

Have we ever had a lineman so highly ranked? How about in 100 years? The answer is no.

I am not saying he is penei, but i like our chances that we got a HIGH ceiling tackle.
duckmaster
One Star Recruit
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 2:12 pm

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by duckmaster »

buckmarkduck wrote:
jimmy12 wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
karlhungis wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:Now we need a LT.
We do? I thought our line was in decent shape.

They are ok, but we don’t have a lot of depth and I feel like a ventral LT would go a long ways in making this like really good.

See Josh Conerly number 1 Tack in this year's class...

We are fine on OL.
Our OL had some horrible games last year. Fine isn’t a word I would use. And counting on a HS kid to be the LT, is risky.
See Penei[/quote]

1 guy in 100 years of UO football? See Utah and Stanford eating our OL lunch, even UA and Cal made them look bad at times. They are average. Hopefully Klemm gets them to play hard every game.[/quote]

Mario was ironically a terrible ol evaluator, developer and coach
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7998
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by karlhungis »

I think it says something that our OL coach, fresh from the NFL, seems mystified by the way Mario and his little sidekick coached our O-Line.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8214
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

karlhungis wrote:I think it says something that our OL coach, fresh from the NFL, seems mystified by the way Mario and his little sidekick coached our O-Line.
Where has he said that?
Image
alxtw
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1075
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by alxtw »

They were pretty poor in evaluating OL prospects. Only penei was a grand slam and it allowed us to get his brother.

They wanted Banks over Conerly, so I'm hoping it was another case of their usual poor scouting and Conerly turns out to be a stud LT!
jimmy12
Senior
Posts: 2823
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by jimmy12 »

alxtw wrote:They were pretty poor in evaluating OL prospects. Only penei was a grand slam and it allowed us to get his brother.

They wanted Banks over Conerly, so I'm hoping it was another case of their usual poor scouting and Conerly turns out to be a stud LT!

Thanks for sharing this... Who said it? Was it Klemm? I can't see him saying publicly because of how his current players would respond.

I am not disagreeing.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10565
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Ducks land Nebraska DL transfer Rogers

Post by buckmarkduck »

jimmy12 wrote:
alxtw wrote:They were pretty poor in evaluating OL prospects. Only penei was a grand slam and it allowed us to get his brother.

They wanted Banks over Conerly, so I'm hoping it was another case of their usual poor scouting and Conerly turns out to be a stud LT!

Thanks for sharing this... Who said it? Was it Klemm? I can't see him saying publicly because of how his current players would respond.

I am not disagreeing.

He was political about it. But basically said he is coaching them different techniques and style.
Post Reply