Ducks didn't play well, and SC shot lights out, but there were points where it really didn't feel like the game was being officiated evenly. I'm not one of those guys that constantly whines about refs, but it just seemed noticeably different to me. SC was reaching in relentlessly, bumping guys going over the back with no calls, and the Ducks were getting called for ticky tack stuff. It wasn't an issue from a free throw perspective, just seemed like SC was allowed to play more aggressive defense and that impacted the Ducks offense a bit. The Kepnang over the back call was especially puzzling to me. I will add the caveat, that I wasn't able to tune in until 2/3 of the way into the first half, so I didn't catch the ugly start.
Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:55 pm
greenyellow
Moderator
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm Posts: 29114 Location: Eugene, OR
Re: MBB: Oregon vs #17 USC (Mon 6 PM FS1)
They have to move on now pretty quickly as the Bay Area trip always gives them issues, especially Stanford.
_________________
Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:03 pm
Everythingsducky
Senior
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:40 pm Posts: 1541
Re: MBB: Oregon vs #17 USC (Mon 6 PM FS1)
ZERO rebounds for Lawson and Kepnang in 31 combined minutes. That CAN’T happen in ANY game EVER for the front line. Hoped Richardson would be more effective, but he is really only a leadership token at this point. He is the point guard, but he is one dimensional now, and not a scoring threat. Thank goodness Williams is back, he and Figueroa were the only players picking up the terrible offense. This did not look like a late season Altman coached team.
Tue Feb 23, 2021 12:31 am
northbeachsf
Senior
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:54 pm Posts: 1137
Re: MBB: Oregon vs #17 USC (Mon 6 PM FS1)
I can't remember an Altman coached team getting beat like that this late in the season. My biggest takeaways:
The entire team looked tired and frustrated, especially Duarte. Several times he got caught playing Ole' defense. When that USC player blew past him for a dunk, that was not like him to not be able to move his feet to try and recover.
Richardson is clearly still not 100%
As someone pointed out above, Kepnang and Lawson HAVE to get some rebounds. That is just crazy.
It was pretty obvious that Oregon was going to lose the battle on the boards, so they were going to need to limit turnovers and make shots. Oregon was +6 in TO margin, so did their job there. They actually shot it okay and outscored USC in the second half. I didn't think defense would be the problem, but it was flat out terrible last night. I think that is probably a result of playing 3 games in 6 days.
I think people are sleeping on USC a little bit. When they are disciplined, making shots, and playing defense, they are a very good team. I think they are capable of making a final 4 run.
Honestly, I don't see this loss as a big deal. It is a Q1 loss away from home and didn't hurt our NET or seeding (according to Lunardi, we are still a 9 seed). This might be a good wakeup call that they are going to need to play defense and rebound on every possession if they are going to want to win games in March.
Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:33 am
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm Posts: 34098 Location: Portland, Oregon
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Re: MBB: Oregon vs #17 USC (Mon 6 PM FS1)
Everythingsducky wrote:
ZERO rebounds for Lawson and Kepnang in 31 combined minutes. That CAN’T happen in ANY game EVER for the front line. Hoped Richardson would be more effective, but he is really only a leadership token at this point. He is the point guard, but he is one dimensional now, and not a scoring threat. Thank goodness Williams is back, he and Figueroa were the only players picking up the terrible offense. This did not look like a late season Altman coached team.
Yikes
_________________ "I'm committed to Miami but Oregon is my leader" -Former Tennessee Vol and Kansas State Wildcat, Bryce Brown Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:34 am
bigsugarduck
Senior
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm Posts: 1096
Re: MBB: Oregon vs #17 USC (Mon 6 PM FS1)
Yeah the rebounding issues was the biggest reason for the loss in my opinion. Just could not make a number of plays right around the basket, missed layups and responds.
I do love the energy Kepang is bringing, but he seems to be jacking himself up too much so to get rebounds (weird thing to say). That, or he's got hands of stone...
_________________ Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:38 pm
OregonFan4Life
Heisman
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm Posts: 9683
Re: MBB: Oregon vs #17 USC (Mon 6 PM FS1)
bigsugarduck wrote:
Yeah the rebounding issues was the biggest reason for the loss in my opinion. Just could not make a number of plays right around the basket, missed layups and responds.
I do love the energy Kepang is bringing, but he seems to be jacking himself up too much so to get rebounds (weird thing to say). That, or he's got hands of stone...
You're right about Kepnag. He and Lawson need to combine their energy and effort to create a perfect medium. Though if I had to choose, I'd rather go with the guy playing too hard than the guy not playing hard enough.
_________________
Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:08 pm
GrantDuck
Senior
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:05 pm Posts: 2122
Re: MBB: Oregon vs #17 USC (Mon 6 PM FS1)
Lawson needs to get stronger. He wins the Mase Funa award for player that didn't seem to work out during quarantine.
Big Frank..I think his hands are actually going to be alright once he settles down a little bit. Was fun seeing him battle the kid that cold be the #1 overall pick. Athletically, he could hang with him, but he needs to learn how to use his size a bit better and just play a little calmer.
It will be great for him to go against Nate Bittle next year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum