NBA Draft Thread

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by Boom »

lukeyrid13 wrote:
Duck24 wrote:
briarduck wrote:Tough choices and I agree with TK but with our picks I would take the Best Player Available at this point...do we have good talent evaluators without our GM in place and more importantly a coach to kow what type of team we have going forward...so BPA is my take.
Outside of Batum and LA, do we have any players that we know are legit starters? Even then, say Thomas Robinson or MKG falls to 6, with the Blazers talent level, can they pass on him?
I think it'd be fairly easy to move up a spot or two in this draft and I think we should. I think Robinson, MKG etc are much better options than Harrison Barnes who will likely be there at 6. Barnes is gonna be good, but as a 3rd option scoring 14 ppg where as the other two guys can be stars and with Robinson I think maybe even a Blake Griffin lite. Move up to 4 or 5 and secure one of those guys by just moving our 2nd rounders or nolan smith
I doubt that get's it done...

nolan smith should be in the D league
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by lukeyrid13 »

I agree, but we're talking moving up 1 to 2 spots. Both Sacramento and cleveland like Barnes so moving back and gaining a backup pg might be ok in their eyes. Blazers traded the 4 and viktor khryapa to move up to #2 and take Aldridge in 06. I think it's feasible.
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by Boom »

lukeyrid13 wrote:I agree, but we're talking moving up 1 to 2 spots. Both Sacramento and cleveland like Barnes so moving back and gaining a backup pg might be ok in their eyes. Blazers traded the 4 and viktor khryapa to move up to #2 and take Aldridge in 06. I think it's feasible.
I get what you're saying, but I think the perceived drop off from #4 to #6 is fairly substantial this year.

For some reason NBA GM's were extremely high on Tyrus Thomas after that NCAA run.

and I'm not sure Nolan Smith is capable of being a backup PG.

But if that's all it took to move up then that would be awesome.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Boom wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:I agree, but we're talking moving up 1 to 2 spots. Both Sacramento and cleveland like Barnes so moving back and gaining a backup pg might be ok in their eyes. Blazers traded the 4 and viktor khryapa to move up to #2 and take Aldridge in 06. I think it's feasible.
I get what you're saying, but I think the perceived drop off from #4 to #6 is fairly substantial this year.

For some reason NBA GM's were extremely high on Tyrus Thomas after that NCAA run.

and I'm not sure Nolan Smith is capable of being a backup PG.

But if that's all it took to move up then that would be awesome.
Well it'd all hinge on someone falling in love with Harrison Barnes. There are reports that Cleveland really likes him and that he is best friends with Kyrie who is pushing hard for them to draft him
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40496
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by UOducksTK1 »

NBAdraft.net has blazers taking Damian Lillard at #6. I could roll with that. Not sure how I feel about Perry Jones though at 11.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3810
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by bellsduck »

Today on ESPN, Chad Ford has the Blazers getting Drummond and Lamb. I'd love to see that happen :D
Duck24
Senior
Posts: 4744
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

NBA Draft Thread

Post by Duck24 »

bellsduck wrote:Today on ESPN, Chad Ford has the Blazers getting Drummond and Lamb. I'd love to see that happen :D
I'd be ecstatic with that. Lamb reminds me of BRoy for some reason. He's just so smooth and looks so relaxed when he plays.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40496
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Duck24 wrote:
bellsduck wrote:Today on ESPN, Chad Ford has the Blazers getting Drummond and Lamb. I'd love to see that happen :D
I'd be ecstatic with that. Lamb reminds me of BRoy for some reason. He's just so smooth and looks so relaxed when he plays.
I'm starting to like taller SG/SFs...

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2064
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by squintsdd »

Never draft for need, always draft the best available player and adjust your needs from there. That being said, I'm hoping they take the best player available at 6 and package the 11 pick for a pg like rondo.

Don't forgot that Portland has hickson on the cheap. While his natural position is PF, he has a toughness that Aldridge doesn't and can play as a smaller center as well
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by Boom »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
Duck24 wrote:
bellsduck wrote:Today on ESPN, Chad Ford has the Blazers getting Drummond and Lamb. I'd love to see that happen :D
I'd be ecstatic with that. Lamb reminds me of BRoy for some reason. He's just so smooth and looks so relaxed when he plays.
I'm starting to like taller SG/SFs...
Especially ones with a long reach

Lamb has a 7ft wingspan
Duck24
Senior
Posts: 4744
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

NBA Draft Thread

Post by Duck24 »

squintsdd wrote:Never draft for need, always draft the best available player and adjust your needs from there. That being said, I'm hoping they take the best player available at 6 and package the 11 pick for a pg like rondo.

Don't forgot that Portland has hickson on the cheap. While his natural position is PF, he has a toughness that Aldridge doesn't and can play as a smaller center as well
Rondo?!?!?! Dude, the Blazers could offer LA, Batum and the 2 first rounders this year and Boston would say no. Boston won't trade Rondo...
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2064
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by squintsdd »

Duck24 wrote:
squintsdd wrote:Never draft for need, always draft the best available player and adjust your needs from there. That being said, I'm hoping they take the best player available at 6 and package the 11 pick for a pg like rondo.

Don't forgot that Portland has hickson on the cheap. While his natural position is PF, he has a toughness that Aldridge doesn't and can play as a smaller center as well
Rondo?!?!?! Dude, the Blazers could offer LA, Batum and the 2 first rounders this year and Boston would say no. Boston won't trade Rondo...
LOL, if the Blazers offered that much I guarentee you Boston would take that in a heart beat. They already considered trading him once, and it's no secret that him and Rivers don't see eye to eye. Boston will be looking to take that team apart in the very near future. They either dismantle that team soon, or risk having the players being too old to keep up with the younger guys and too old to trade. Portland may not have the pieces to trade for Rondo, but it wouldn't surprise me to see him in a different uniform before the trade deadline next season.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40496
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Duck24 wrote:
squintsdd wrote:Never draft for need, always draft the best available player and adjust your needs from there. That being said, I'm hoping they take the best player available at 6 and package the 11 pick for a pg like rondo.

Don't forgot that Portland has hickson on the cheap. While his natural position is PF, he has a toughness that Aldridge doesn't and can play as a smaller center as well
Rondo?!?!?! Dude, the Blazers could offer LA, Batum and the 2 first rounders this year and Boston would say no. Boston won't trade Rondo...
Of course they would. Not to mention, Celtic's big three are getting old, they will need to rebuild sometime soon. Rondo would probably be a keeper piece, but to get a premier relatively young PF, and Batum + 2 1st rounders, that's GOLD in terms of rebuilding.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by ncduck »

NBA draft combine is on ESPNU right now. Brutal television, I guess that's why it's on the U.

MKG was a no show.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: NBA Draft Thread

Post by lukeyrid13 »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
Duck24 wrote:
squintsdd wrote:Never draft for need, always draft the best available player and adjust your needs from there. That being said, I'm hoping they take the best player available at 6 and package the 11 pick for a pg like rondo.

Don't forgot that Portland has hickson on the cheap. While his natural position is PF, he has a toughness that Aldridge doesn't and can play as a smaller center as well
Rondo?!?!?! Dude, the Blazers could offer LA, Batum and the 2 first rounders this year and Boston would say no. Boston won't trade Rondo...
Of course they would. Not to mention, Celtic's big three are getting old, they will need to rebuild sometime soon. Rondo would probably be a keeper piece, but to get a premier relatively young PF, and Batum + 2 1st rounders, that's GOLD in terms of rebuilding.
It's pretty much impossible to trade Batum with picks since he's a RFA.
Post Reply