Blazers

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40520
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketb ... t-moultrie
If blazers don't get a big at #6, and the illinois center isn't available at 11. I would love for Portland to look at Moultrie.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

UOducksTK1 wrote:Freeland finally coming to Portland?

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/player ... 616&spln=1
I've been reading that as well, but it does seem like Olshey will only bring him to Portland if he fits in with what they're doing. If he doesn't, I fully expect his rights to be traded on or shortly after the Draft. The same could probably be said for Victor Claver, but it kind of sounds like he may be a year away from coming to the NBA.
Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40520
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

On a side note, it would be cool if the Blazers could sign Brooks. I think he's still got it in him.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

UOducksTK1 wrote:On a side note, it would be cool if the Blazers could sign Brooks. I think he's still got it in him.
He'll only be a restricted FA, which means PHX could match any offer and retain him. It seems likely they'll retain him at all costs due to Nash's status as an unrestricted FA.
Image
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by oregontrack »

brooks would be a decent gunner off the bench. i wouldn't want him starting.

then again, i suppose we did start raymond felton for an entire season last year. it's not like we could do worse.
ImageImageImageImageImage
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3811
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: Blazers

Post by bellsduck »

Rockets apparently looking to trade Lowry for a top 10 pick. Wonder if they'd take 11? I wouldn't mind picking him up. When he was healthy last year I think he was great. Then maybe we could move Felton and something for a 16-20 pick and still pick up a pretty decent prospect there.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Blazers

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Felton is unrestricted FA so Blazers no longer hold his rights to trade
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

bellsduck wrote:Rockets apparently looking to trade Lowry for a top 10 pick. Wonder if they'd take 11? I wouldn't mind picking him up. When he was healthy last year I think he was great. Then maybe we could move Felton and something for a 16-20 pick and still pick up a pretty decent prospect there.
They are really looking to move up since they just traded Chase Buddinger to Minnesota for their 1st rounder, meaning they now have 3 picks to now package in any other trade. Rumors are they want to move up to 5 to get Drummond.
Image
Duck24
Senior
Posts: 4744
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by Duck24 »

greenyellow wrote:
bellsduck wrote:Rockets apparently looking to trade Lowry for a top 10 pick. Wonder if they'd take 11? I wouldn't mind picking him up. When he was healthy last year I think he was great. Then maybe we could move Felton and something for a 16-20 pick and still pick up a pretty decent prospect there.
They are really looking to move up since they just traded Chase Buddinger to Minnesota for their 1st rounder, meaning they now have 3 picks to now package in any other trade. Rumors are they want to move up to 5 to get Drummond.
Heard on Van Pelt that they plan on making a run at Dwight Howard with all of those assets that they are compiling. Doesn't make sense because as soon as those rumors came out, Howard said he has no intention of signing a long term deal. As great of a player as Howard is though, he is a huge prima donna and his act is getting really old. It makes you appreciate the humble guys who just want to win.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

With Batum getting a near-max deal from Minnesota, I'm not so sure that Portland will retain him. To me, he's just not worth nearly $12 million a year. As for Hibbert, it sounds like a toss-up if Indiana will match Portland's offer.
Image
User avatar
frogsnouts
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:41 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by frogsnouts »

I think if Portland gets Hibbert they will match Batum and go for broke hoping that at least one of the new rookies over performs.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

frogsnouts wrote:I think if Portland gets Hibbert they will match Batum and go for broke hoping that at least one of the new rookies over performs.
I just see the offer that Batum got from Minnesota as way too much for what he's worth. I think Portland could possibly do fine with a cheaper FA option or go with one of the young SFs on the roster already.
Image
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Blazers

Post by Boom »

greenyellow wrote:
frogsnouts wrote:I think if Portland gets Hibbert they will match Batum and go for broke hoping that at least one of the new rookies over performs.
I just see the offer that Batum got from Minnesota as way too much for what he's worth. I think Portland could possibly do fine with a cheaper FA option or go with one of the young SFs on the roster already.
Babbit? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Portland has to overpay people... always have.

They can't afford to let Batum walk for nothing. At the very least they gotta do a sign and trade and get something back.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

Boom wrote:
greenyellow wrote:
frogsnouts wrote:I think if Portland gets Hibbert they will match Batum and go for broke hoping that at least one of the new rookies over performs.
I just see the offer that Batum got from Minnesota as way too much for what he's worth. I think Portland could possibly do fine with a cheaper FA option or go with one of the young SFs on the roster already.
Babbit? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Portland has to overpay people... always have.

They can't afford to let Batum walk for nothing. At the very least they gotta do a sign and trade and get something back.
Only way that works is if he doesn't sign that offer sheet from Minnesota, which he's leaning towards doing. If they get Hibbert, they could possibly let Batum walk, since I'm not sure he's the part that will get Portland over the hump and into contention in the West. He's a decent enough player, but at $12-13 million, I don't think so. There are other SFs out there that could provide some defense and spot-up 3-point shooting that would replace Batum.
Image
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40520
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Blazers are not in very many commercials...

http://hoopshype.com/commercials.htm

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
Post Reply