Seahawks

[Duck07]

[buckmarkduck]

I saw what happened to Berry, I also saw what my boy Thomas did with that pick. Like I have said since day one Earl is the better of the two because of his speed.

[Braveheart]

Ouch, that looked brutal. Reminds me of WTIII's hit when he tore his ACL.

Oh by the way, Russell Wilson will start in Week 1.

Sick, selected him with one of my last picks in Fantasy Football.

[Braveheart]

"If I were Matt Flynn and Tarvaris Jackson, I'd be leery of this kid because, if you give him a chance...If you give this kid a legitimate chance to win the job...he'll win it."

-Jon Gruden

[uodux1212]

Cool news, he's fun to watch... Us northwesterners are forced to watch Seahawks football every week, this should make things a bit more interesting.

[Phenom]

Not sure I agree with that block on Berry. Too low for preseason.

[oregontrack]

well deserved for wilson. i'm going to ramble for a moment:

i can see the seahawks starting 4-1, with a couple breaks along the way. that's not to say they WILL start 4-1, but i think it's doable if wilson doesn't crap the bed. we start @ arizona, dallas, green bay, @ st. louis, @ carolina. we likely won't beat green bay, but everything else is winnable. and we probably need to start out 4-1: we've got a brutal following three weeks, new england/@ san fran/@ detroit. let's be conservative this time and call that stretch 0-3; we'd be sitting at 4-4. minnesota, new york (jets), bye, @ miami are next = could very well be a 3-0 stretch. 7-4? assuming good health? @ chicago is next. as good as chicago may be, we've won their the last two regular seasons. not sure why we're playing another road game in the windy city, but whatever. it's practically a home away from home now, especially when you consider we tripped there for the 2010 playoffs, too. but let's call it a loss all the same. 7-5. arizona/@buffalo/san fran/st. louis ends the season. i would expect to win all three home games. buffalo in new york? hard to say. probably a brutal game temperature wise, cross country flight, etc. but the bills also like to implode late in the season. eh, let's call it a loss.

that highly scientific nonsense you just read puts seattle at 10-6. wild card baby! i think the hawks are this year's cincinnati bengals... outstanding defensively and a rookie quarterback good enough to not throw up all over himself.

[Phenom]

2-3 is more probable than 4-1, IMO.

[oregontrack]

as a fan, you can't go into a season expecting losses to trash like dallas and carolina. you just can't.

[Phenom]

as a fan, you can't go into a season expecting losses to trash like dallas and carolina. you just can't.

haha true, especially with your defense.

[oregontrack]

like i said, we're going to start off the year by losing to arizona.

[Braveheart]

Should've beat them, but depending on Braylon to make a clutch catch the last few years is a no-no. Right through his hands.

[buckmarkduck]

Seahawks giving the boys a butt kicking today. With Moffit back the oline looks solid, and the D is just nasty.

[oregontrack]

yeah, there's no place like home for seattle. outside of a couple third downs the defense played excellent, and the maturation of russell wilson continues. really glad we're starting to get the tight ends involved.

ridiculously nasty block by golden tate... legal or not

i guess i don't feel so bad for losing to arizona in a close game in the desert. if you can walk into new england and come out with a win, you're probably a pretty good team. the niners are probably the best team in the nfc, and even st. louis has looked pretty good so far. the nfc west suddenly doesn't look so weak.

[oregontrack]

7-0 seahawks, nearly halftime. 8 sacks on rodgers so far tonight. seahawk pass rush is epic.