#3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40569
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

#3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Tigers 19 South Carolina 17

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
DAT#6
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 953
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:01 am

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by DAT#6 »

I like South Carolina-despite the 'Ol Football Coach.

SC 24 LSU 21
Greenblood
Senior
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:16 pm

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by Greenblood »

Whom do we root for in this? Feels like we want this USC to get a loss.
DAT#6
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 953
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:01 am

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by DAT#6 »

Greenblood wrote:Whom do we root for in this? Feels like we want this USC to get a loss.
If LSU loses, we won't have to worry about them any more this season, and we can root for them to win out. SC probably only needs one loss to be out of the picture, and they have good opportunities for a loss with Florida and probably Alabama.

I am happy either way.
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by Duck07 »

Night game at Death Valley so I'm picking the Tigers
Image
Greenblood
Senior
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:16 pm

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by Greenblood »

DAT#6 wrote:
Greenblood wrote:Whom do we root for in this? Feels like we want this USC to get a loss.
If LSU loses, we won't have to worry about them any more this season, and we can root for them to win out. SC probably only needs one loss to be out of the picture, and they have good opportunities for a loss with Florida and probably Alabama.

I am happy either way.
Not to divert this threat, but . . . does any one-loss team get ahead of (what we hope is) an unbeaten Duck team after all the conference championship games in early December? I think not.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40569
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Greenblood wrote:
DAT#6 wrote:
Greenblood wrote:Whom do we root for in this? Feels like we want this USC to get a loss.
If LSU loses, we won't have to worry about them any more this season, and we can root for them to win out. SC probably only needs one loss to be out of the picture, and they have good opportunities for a loss with Florida and probably Alabama.

I am happy either way.
Not to divert this threat, but . . . does any one-loss team get ahead of (what we hope is) an unbeaten Duck team after all the conference championship games in early December? I think not.
Not humanly possible. But if the computers rank us in the teens, I suppose it's possible.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
nogerO
Senior
Posts: 4516
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Location: Wyoming

Anybody else concerned

Post by nogerO »

That a big win by USC (S Carolina) in Death Valley, coupled with the Ducks on a bye week (out of sight to the east coast biased voters) will result in them leap-froggin us for #2? You know they are just looking for a reason to drop some "weak" PAC 12 team out of the NC talk. Discuss...
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
User avatar
Bud Lee
All Pac-12
Posts: 5541
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
Location: Da Boot

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by Bud Lee »

I'm worried....
whosyourwally
Freshman
Posts: 1301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:52 am
Location: Columbus, Ohio

#3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by whosyourwally »

LSU would drop to at least 10th if they lose. Still ahead of unbeaten Oregon State. Because its better to lose to SEC schools than to beat anybody else.
karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by karlhungis »

I don't see how LSU finds the endzone in this one. I think the cocks take it.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
DAT#6
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 953
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:01 am

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by DAT#6 »

Greenblood wrote:
DAT#6 wrote:
Greenblood wrote:Whom do we root for in this? Feels like we want this USC to get a loss.
If LSU loses, we won't have to worry about them any more this season, and we can root for them to win out. SC probably only needs one loss to be out of the picture, and they have good opportunities for a loss with Florida and probably Alabama.

I am happy either way.
Not to divert this threat, but . . . does any one-loss team get ahead of (what we hope is) an unbeaten Duck team after all the conference championship games in early December? I think not.
A one loss team won't finish ahead of an undefeated UO, but I doubt we will make it through 13 games unscathed.
User avatar
Bud Lee
All Pac-12
Posts: 5541
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:03 am
Location: Da Boot

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by Bud Lee »

whosyourwally wrote:LSU would drop to at least 10th if they lose. Still ahead of unbeaten Oregon State. Because its better to lose to SEC schools than to beat anybody else.
If LSU loses USC and Oregon State will both jump them in the AP.

We are down 15 players, it will be one hell of a feet to make it through the next 4 weeks without multiple loses
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by squintsdd »

It's in LSU so it could easily go their way, but I just don't think they have the offense to get through a a better than normal USCe defense. Defenses on both sides will keep this game low scoring and close.
User avatar
Duck07
All-American
Posts: 17123
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: #3 South Carolina @ #9 LSU

Post by Duck07 »

If there is a coach in CFB who knows how to ride the proverbial huffy and pick up an ugly win, its Les.
Image
Post Reply