Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- Duckenstein
- Freshman
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
The big one is Falo though
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
-
karlhungis
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
I'm guessing they are counting Lenoir as the surprise.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
That would be lame.karlhungis wrote:I'm guessing they are counting Lenoir as the surprise.
Overall, underwhelming considering what we were expecting but pretty good considering where we were a few months ago.
- QuackininBama
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5728
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:55 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
The national media finally gets a chance to breath a sigh of relief. USC and Washington return to the top of the Pac-12 and Oregon returns to the middle of the division. All has been righted in the college football world.greenyellow wrote:So it's looking like this class will be about 24 players if/when Lenoir commits. Sucks they couldn't pull in some more players. Oregon is solidly in the top 25 but it would have been to get top-20. USC just absolutely whooped everyone in the Pac-12 this year on the recruiting front. They're going to be awfully tough to beat now.
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39340
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
The coaches did as good a job as one could expect them to do with a month to recruit. Think this is a case where excitement and enthusiasm weren't enough to overcome their time constraints. Give them a few more weeks or months and I think they pull in some of the big guys they went after. Still think this class is solid and likely in much better shape than if Helfrich had been retained and allowed to finish this class.

-
scoducks
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:19 pm
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
Look on the bright side... even if we were underwhelming we arn't Texas... Recruiting hotbed and they are #33 in the recruiting rankings. So much for Tom Herman working miracles over there.Phenom wrote:That would be lame.karlhungis wrote:I'm guessing they are counting Lenoir as the surprise.![]()
Overall, underwhelming considering what we were expecting but pretty good considering where we were a few months ago.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
I heard Lang is not going to USC. We should get on that.
-
karlhungis
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
It's actually pretty shocking that Herman couldn't build a better class even on short notice.scoducks wrote:Look on the bright side... even if we were underwhelming we arn't Texas... Recruiting hotbed and they are #33 in the recruiting rankings. So much for Tom Herman working miracles over there.Phenom wrote:That would be lame.karlhungis wrote:I'm guessing they are counting Lenoir as the surprise.![]()
Overall, underwhelming considering what we were expecting but pretty good considering where we were a few months ago.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39340
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
Really? #33? That's just bad for Texas, considering their location and tradition.scoducks wrote:Look on the bright side... even if we were underwhelming we arn't Texas... Recruiting hotbed and they are #33 in the recruiting rankings. So much for Tom Herman working miracles over there.Phenom wrote:That would be lame.karlhungis wrote:I'm guessing they are counting Lenoir as the surprise.![]()
Overall, underwhelming considering what we were expecting but pretty good considering where we were a few months ago.

- CanadianQuackers
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:07 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
When did JHop say this?Duckenstein wrote:Damn jhops info was off. Thompson, Artis, Falaniko, falo
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
His staff hires were very underwhelming.karlhungis wrote:It's actually pretty shocking that Herman couldn't build a better class even on short notice.scoducks wrote:Look on the bright side... even if we were underwhelming we arn't Texas... Recruiting hotbed and they are #33 in the recruiting rankings. So much for Tom Herman working miracles over there.Phenom wrote:That would be lame.karlhungis wrote:I'm guessing they are counting Lenoir as the surprise.![]()
Overall, underwhelming considering what we were expecting but pretty good considering where we were a few months ago.
Taggart built this thing right (besides Reaves).
-
scoducks
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:19 pm
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
If you think DT is bad with the disappointment, go on Texas' 247 site. Definitely think it is the end of the world. They are 33rd on Rivals, 28th on Scout and I think 27th on 247. Either way we did better.greenyellow wrote:Really? #33? That's just bad for Texas, considering their location and tradition.scoducks wrote:Look on the bright side... even if we were underwhelming we arn't Texas... Recruiting hotbed and they are #33 in the recruiting rankings. So much for Tom Herman working miracles over there.Phenom wrote:That would be lame.karlhungis wrote:I'm guessing they are counting Lenoir as the surprise.![]()
Overall, underwhelming considering what we were expecting but pretty good considering where we were a few months ago.
- Phenom
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 9914
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
He did through his proxy (QB11).CanadianQuackers wrote:When did JHop say this?Duckenstein wrote:Damn jhops info was off. Thompson, Artis, Falaniko, falo
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39340
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
He told some guys on DT that's who he thought Oregon would get based on the information he had. Only two on his list Oregon will likely end up with are Lenoir, Gibson, and Moore. Just shows that information near NSD can get out of date real fast with how fluid this time is.CanadianQuackers wrote:When did JHop say this?Duckenstein wrote:Damn jhops info was off. Thompson, Artis, Falaniko, falo
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

- Duckenstein
- Freshman
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: Signing Day Thread (Wednesday February 1st)
Is the class done? Is Falo gone? Anyone else we're waiting on?
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk