Lattimore update

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

karlhungis
All Pac-12
Posts: 7990
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Lattimore update

Post by karlhungis »

It's a shame we don't seem to have a shot at Scott. He would be a nice thunder back for us.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
User avatar
wheaton4prez
Senior
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Lattimore update

Post by wheaton4prez »

It seems to me that James has been just as effective gaining short yardage as any large back I've ever seen.
gofightingducks
All Pac-12
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:08 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Lattimore update

Post by gofightingducks »

wheaton4prez wrote:It seems to me that James has been just as effective gaining short yardage as any large back I've ever seen.

I agree, he has been great but I think the reason why we would like to see a big back is to compliment James to allow him a breather and to not wear him down as the season goes on. Like Quizz last season a smaller back can wear down as the season goes and is unable to take the load. Fortunately for us we are not the Beavers and don't rely on 2 players and are able to spread the ball around as to not wear down our players.
User avatar
wheaton4prez
Senior
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Lattimore update

Post by wheaton4prez »

Can't we already give him breaks with another true tailback like Barner?

I've just come to believe that this offense doesn't really need a big, between the tackles guy. It can utilize one. But, it's not a need, imo.
Post Reply