Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
Merganzer
- Senior
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Despite the injury to Nyara? If Sedona Prince doesn't get a transfer waiver, I don't know that #1 is warranted.
-
Greenblood
- Senior
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:16 pm
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
While I by no means fancy myself a women's college basketball expert, with four returning starters (three of whom are perhaps AA quality), three returning reserves, three international recruits + Moore on their roster, I can't say I'm surprised the Ducks are #1. I even wonder, as good as she hopefully will prove to be at some point, just how much the presence of Nyara -- still yet to play college ball -- would even figure into such preseason predictions.
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
-
Thurston
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:49 pm
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Who else would it be? Baylor is #2, and we lost a super close F4 game to them and they lost Kalani Brown to graduation. We're as good a bet as #1 as anyone else.
-
duck58
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Exactly.Thurston wrote:Who else would it be? Baylor is #2, and we lost a super close F4 game to them and they lost Kalani Brown to graduation. We're as good a bet as #1 as anyone else.
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Totally get that. Such is the difference between rankings and predicting who will actually win it all.
I hope it's as simple as Prince is deemed eligible.
I hope it's as simple as Prince is deemed eligible.
- bigsugarduck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Wrong.StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...
If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Oh, I'm sorry. Thanks for setting me straight.bigsugarduck wrote:Wrong.StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...
If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
....
- bigsugarduck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
StevensTechU wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. Thanks for setting me straight.bigsugarduck wrote:Wrong.StevensTechU wrote:Oregon's downfall in 2019 was size inside. Nyara is 6'5, and Prince is 6'7. Without the addition of one of those two (down to Prince now), the team will have the same Achilles.
Depth was the downfall. Yes, of course a few more bigs would have been great, but Oregon absolutely beats Baylor if Taylor Chavez helps spell the guards in that game. Sabrina ran out of gas playing the whole game, and couldn't make shots late...lacking guard depth cut the season short, not lacking bigs...
If Oregon has better depth this year, they should absolutely be #1. Oregon may have 3 of the top 10-15 players in the country with Hebard, Sabally and Ionescue. No one else can make that argument...
....
I totally get your point about the lack of bigs but really think that was simply part of the overall lack of depth.
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."
-
Merganzer
- Senior
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:42 am
- bigsugarduck
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:52 pm
Re: Ducks #1 in Way Too Early WBB ESPN Top 25
Ooops....Guess I should have said 3 of the top 7 (draft eligible players) in the country...Apparently I undersold them...Merganzer wrote:
Being cautious is understandable, but no other team should be #1 with the starter talent Oregon has.
Stewart Mandel-"From a purely aesthetic standpoint, I much prefer to watch a good spread-rushing offense over a traditional Power-I offense, and Oregon's has been the most fun by far for the past several years. It's fast, its precise, and when Chip Kelly has the right quarterback (Dixon, Masoli) at the helm, the possibility of someone ripping off a 60-yard run exists on nearly every play."