Better yet why is Barros amazing raw potentialduckyoubeavers wrote:how is barros only B potential with amazing raw potential?
1989 Draft Discussion
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
- offtheheezy
- Senior
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm
- GM: Vancouver Grizzlies
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Fair. Kemp is only 20 and seems like he could play SF :O so I really like himvincent1469 wrote:Hardaway just seems kinda risky since he is 23 without any stats above B. Still like Hardaway tho, he could easily prove me wrong.offtheheezy wrote:Why Glen Rice? I thought it was between Hardaway and Kemp. Guess that shows this class really could've gone anywherevincent1469 wrote:Ngl was expecting Rice to go number 1
Also Rice and Kemp have pretty similar stats but Pistons got Karl Malone already so I figured Rice would be better
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
His notes have been fixedofftheheezy wrote:Better yet why is Barros amazing raw potentialduckyoubeavers wrote:how is barros only B potential with amazing raw potential?

- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Our goal of having no clear #1 pick has proven to have worked
This will be interesting to look back on in 3 years
This will be interesting to look back on in 3 years

- FlDuckFan
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5068
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:45 am
- GM: Orlando Magic GM
- Location: Florida
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Hope I picked the right guy, I was between him and 1 other.
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10475
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
I'm considering my options for a little bit here at 6. Don't want to rush a decision
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
This draft is tough lol lotta nice looking guys but hard to parse out who's going to be the best of the bunch.
SUNS GM
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10475
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
I'm almost certain Mookie will have a better career when it's all said and done, but Pervis is the safe choice for me.
- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Pervis' writeup and grades look like he should have been in serious #1 consideration. He's already grading out as a good starting C without any improvements, I would have taken him over multiple guys who went before him.
Hornets GM
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10475
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
210 pounds thoughCellar-door wrote:Pervis' writeup and grades look like he should have been in serious #1 consideration. He's already grading out as a good starting C without any improvements, I would have taken him over multiple guys who went before him.
But I’ll look to boost his strength
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Pounds mean nothing, just go off notes in regards to speed and strengthlukeyrid13 wrote:210 pounds thoughCellar-door wrote:Pervis' writeup and grades look like he should have been in serious #1 consideration. He's already grading out as a good starting C without any improvements, I would have taken him over multiple guys who went before him.
But I’ll look to boost his strength

- Cellar-door
- Senior
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 2:06 pm
- GM: Charlotte Hornets
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
The restriction to the post tells me he's got at least solid PF strength with above average speed, because that is what would make him a dominant monster at SF.lukeyrid13 wrote:210 pounds thoughCellar-door wrote:Pervis' writeup and grades look like he should have been in serious #1 consideration. He's already grading out as a good starting C without any improvements, I would have taken him over multiple guys who went before him.
But I’ll look to boost his strength
Hornets GM
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10475
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Can ferry play backup at SF or no?
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15301
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Danny Ferry C+ B- D B- C+ A (restricted to post)lukeyrid13 wrote:Can ferry play backup at SF or no?
No
