Trust the coaches

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
maxduck
Senior
Posts: 3763
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:37 pm

Trust the coaches

Post by maxduck »

A link to eDuck and a listing of the Ducks starting lineup and the recruiting stars when they signed. Lots of 4 star guy behind 2 star guys.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=128&f=1423&t=5309026
hines
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 442
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:30 am

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by hines »

maxduck wrote:A link to eDuck and a listing of the Ducks starting lineup and the recruiting stars when they signed. Lots of 4 star guy behind 2 star guys.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=128&f=1423&t=5309026
well a couple of things. like one of the posters mentions, the masoli 1 star thing is just because he wasn't rated by anyone. he was arguably the best JC qb in the country which pretty much means he was at least a 4 star kid. asper is a 2 star because when players go on missions, they are rarely ever re-ranked when they come back. and one has to remember that getting a scholie FROM ANY D-1 school means you get at least 2 stars. so if you only get ONE scholie offer from U of Idaho and ZERO other offers, you get 2 stars.
bigfootlebowski
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 427
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:10 am

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by bigfootlebowski »

maxduck wrote:A link to eDuck and a listing of the Ducks starting lineup and the recruiting stars when they signed. Lots of 4 star guy behind 2 star guys.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=128&f=1423&t=5309026
they show masoli as 1*(before evaluation?) but i am certain he was bumped up to a 4*, he did win the jc national champ as a freshman qb
bigfootlebowski
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 427
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:10 am

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by bigfootlebowski »

maxduck wrote:A link to eDuck and a listing of the Ducks starting lineup and the recruiting stars when they signed. Lots of 4 star guy behind 2 star guys.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=128&f=1423&t=5309026
and james was a 4 star i guess this is the diff between scout and rivals...
GrandpaDuck
Senior
Posts: 3310
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by GrandpaDuck »

Masoli was a 1 star at the time he was signed. Scout re-evaluated him after he signed to a 3 star.

http://oregon.scout.com/a.z?s=128&p=8&c=1&nid=3481647

Both the pre and post signing evaluations are still on the Scout site.
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by duckgrad99 »

I trust the coaches with offensive players, but I'm not sure about defensive players. If the problem isn't Aliotti, it must be the talent or lack of talent on the defensive side of the ball. Finding a few guys that can put pressure on opposing qb's would be nice. We'll find guys occasionally like a Nick Reed or Kenny Rowe, but not enough.
Image
User avatar
shear_j
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:42 pm
Location: Astoria/Klamath Falls OR

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by shear_j »

duckgrad99 wrote:I trust the coaches with offensive players, but I'm not sure about defensive players. If the problem isn't Aliotti, it must be the talent or lack of talent on the defensive side of the ball. Finding a few guys that can put pressure on opposing qb's would be nice. We'll find guys occasionally like a Nick Reed or Kenny Rowe, but not enough.
Also...this is the first year I've been happy with our linebackers. Its not that we haven't signed good ones, like Terrance Pritchett who was the #2 MLB in the country, but sometimes they just haven't panned out. I dont know if they've been just busts or issues in developing, but I think that was one of the biggest differences this year with our defense playing better.

I mean we've had some good ones (trucks and phillips come to mind right off the top of my head) but never a complete LB corp since the Madson Moretti Mallard and Mitchell days.

Other than linebackers, I couldn't be happier with our recruiting and development though.
Image
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12823
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by woundedknees »

Having 2 or 3 of those failure to qualify 4-5 Star interior linemen make it in may well have gone a long ways toward making the other members of the defense look a lot better.

Balance is a beautiful thing.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
User avatar
hendrg
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:27 am
Location: Santiago, Chile

Re: Trust the coaches

Post by hendrg »

shear_j wrote:
duckgrad99 wrote:I trust the coaches with offensive players, but I'm not sure about defensive players. If the problem isn't Aliotti, it must be the talent or lack of talent on the defensive side of the ball. Finding a few guys that can put pressure on opposing qb's would be nice. We'll find guys occasionally like a Nick Reed or Kenny Rowe, but not enough.
Also...this is the first year I've been happy with our linebackers. Its not that we haven't signed good ones, like Terrance Pritchett who was the #2 MLB in the country, but sometimes they just haven't panned out. I dont know if they've been just busts or issues in developing, but I think that was one of the biggest differences this year with our defense playing better.

I mean we've had some good ones (trucks and phillips come to mind right off the top of my head) but never a complete LB corp since the Madson Moretti Mallard and Mitchell days.

Other than linebackers, I couldn't be happier with our recruiting and development though.
I hear ya when looking at the past. The future looks awesome to me though:

Pleasant, Matthews and Paysinger 1 more year together.

I've really liked the play of Kaddu, Alonso, Clay and Littlejohn this year as well.

Waiting in the wings we have Boseko Lokombo and Dewitt Stuckey - both those guys have potential as well.

I'm pumped!
Image
sx1080
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 481
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:56 am

meaningless

Post by sx1080 »

maxduck wrote:A link to eDuck and a listing of the Ducks starting lineup and the recruiting stars when they signed. Lots of 4 star guy behind 2 star guys.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=128&f=1423&t=5309026

the two and three star guys that start might only be starting becasue staff wiffed on the 4 and 5 star guys they wanted and offered.

Maybe the Ducks would be undefeated and in the NC game the last two yrs if they got the 4 and 5 star guys they recruited.
ducksrock
Senior
Posts: 2737
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:08 am

Re: meaningless

Post by ducksrock »

sx1080 wrote:
maxduck wrote:A link to eDuck and a listing of the Ducks starting lineup and the recruiting stars when they signed. Lots of 4 star guy behind 2 star guys.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=128&f=1423&t=5309026

the two and three star guys that start might only be starting becasue staff wiffed on the 4 and 5 star guys they wanted and offered.

Maybe the Ducks would be undefeated and in the NC game the last two yrs if they got the 4 and 5 star guys they recruited.
I think the Ducks are doin just fine the way things are....We are savin the NC for 2010-2011....
Post Reply