Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by lukeyrid13 »

What they should do, is just draft the player with the most potential and plan out for long term

What they actually do, is try and get us back to being a 46 win team to support Dame. I love Dame, but we just don't have a competing roster and it's really not even close
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35678
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Blazers get Jerami Grant with Milwaukee's 2025 first-round pick they got in the McCollum trade and a bunch of exchanged second round picks in 2025 and 2026. That's not a bad deal since they essentially turned CJ and Nance into Hart and Grant. Certainly seems they're going to use the 7th pick unless they somehow plan on swinging it for other players/picks.
Image
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by Phalanx »

So, one first-round pick, two second-round picks, and a trade down from 36 to 46. That's a very stiff price for a one-year rental, unless they think they can sign him to a new deal. I guess the good news is that the Blazers pick up a much-needed scorer, although the 3 pt percentage isn't great. It also seems likely they were holding back #7 to actually use, which seems like a positive. The bad news is that a lot of the trade chips are gone - all those picks, plus the $21 million in cap space we were told was being reserved for a top free agent. Not sure a guy only signed through the upcoming season was the best use of those assets. More 'Win Now'.

Still, Grant will likely be playing his best ball next year since it is a contract year. The tanking is over.

Re-sign Nurk and Simons, draft a wing that can play defense at 7 and a project big at the four to replace Elleby, and then there might be room for one more mid-range free-agent signing like an Ed Davis or Aminu type. Could be a playoff team. Not a contender, probably, unless the draftee blows up in his rookie year. Just waiting for Lillard to finish making all his money so the team can be good again.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35678
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Blazers pick Shaedon Sharpe with the 7th pick. Unless they're still working on a trade, they've got their man for the time being.
Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10565
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by buckmarkduck »

Phalanx wrote:So, one first-round pick, two second-round picks, and a trade down from 36 to 46. That's a very stiff price for a one-year rental, unless they think they can sign him to a new deal. I guess the good news is that the Blazers pick up a much-needed scorer, although the 3 pt percentage isn't great. It also seems likely they were holding back #7 to actually use, which seems like a positive. The bad news is that a lot of the trade chips are gone - all those picks, plus the $21 million in cap space we were told was being reserved for a top free agent. Not sure a guy only signed through the upcoming season was the best use of those assets. More 'Win Now'.

Still, Grant will likely be playing his best ball next year since it is a contract year. The tanking is over.

Re-sign Nurk and Simons, draft a wing that can play defense at 7 and a project big at the four to replace Elleby, and then there might be room for one more mid-range free-agent signing like an Ed Davis or Aminu type. Could be a playoff team. Not a contender, probably, unless the draftee blows up in his rookie year. Just waiting for Lillard to finish making all his money so the team can be good again.

No late 1st is going to put up Grants number. Basically anything outside the lottery is like trading a 3-4 round NFL pick. 2nd round picks are like 5-7th rounders in the NFL draft.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35678
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Blazers take Colorado F Jabari Walker with their final pick of the draft. Possibly a guy who could turn into a dependable bench guy if he develops.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35678
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Sounds like Portland was really burning up the phone lines looking to make some deals but couldn't find one they liked. It does look like Dame is okay with them picking Sharpe.
Image
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by Phalanx »

buckmarkduck wrote:
No late 1st is going to put up Grants number. Basically anything outside the lottery is like trading a 3-4 round NFL pick. 2nd round picks are like 5-7th rounders in the NFL draft.
Is this a good time to point out that Grant himself was a second-round pick?

Anyway, I don't think this trade is as obviously bad as, say, signing Evan Turner. I just hate to see picks going out every year for middling players just to keep Lillard happy. I'm really glad it looks like they are keeping Sharpe, and they drafted the project post player as I suspected they would. I don't get the trade of pick 46 for what looks like a worse pick in two years...that makes me think it was Portland's idea to ditch the pick. I've never seen a present pick going for a worse future pick before, and I keep hoping there was more to that trade than is being reported. Nobody asked about it in the presser.

So many times, I came away from Olshey drafts disappointed or angry. I feel like this draft was more of a sensible, if unspectacular draft process. They are taking a risk with Sharpe compared to who else was available, but there are rumblings that he could be a really good player, so hopefully it works out.
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by Phalanx »

greenyellow wrote:Sounds like Portland was really burning up the phone lines looking to make some deals but couldn't find one they liked. It does look like Dame is okay with them picking Sharpe.
Oh man, what a relief! I was on pins and needles wondering how Dame felt about the team keeping a draft pick once every few years to maybe have a future after he is done being overpaid.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35678
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Phalanx wrote:
greenyellow wrote:Sounds like Portland was really burning up the phone lines looking to make some deals but couldn't find one they liked. It does look like Dame is okay with them picking Sharpe.
Oh man, what a relief! I was on pins and needles wondering how Dame felt about the team keeping a draft pick once every few years to maybe have a future after he is done being overpaid.
Your hate for Dame is just so weird.
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35678
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Phalanx wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
No late 1st is going to put up Grants number. Basically anything outside the lottery is like trading a 3-4 round NFL pick. 2nd round picks are like 5-7th rounders in the NFL draft.
Is this a good time to point out that Grant himself was a second-round pick?

Anyway, I don't think this trade is as obviously bad as, say, signing Evan Turner. I just hate to see picks going out every year for middling players just to keep Lillard happy. I'm really glad it looks like they are keeping Sharpe, and they drafted the project post player as I suspected they would. I don't get the trade of pick 46 for what looks like a worse pick in two years...that makes me think it was Portland's idea to ditch the pick. I've never seen a present pick going for a worse future pick before, and I keep hoping there was more to that trade than is being reported. Nobody asked about it in the presser.

So many times, I came away from Olshey drafts disappointed or angry. I feel like this draft was more of a sensible, if unspectacular draft process. They are taking a risk with Sharpe compared to who else was available, but there are rumblings that he could be a really good player, so hopefully it works out.
Part of the reasoning (which came from some supposed insiders) for dropping from #46 was they were targeting Memphis' Josh Minott with that pick and then once he was gone, they moved on to their next pick with Jabari Walker.
Image
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by Phalanx »

greenyellow wrote:
Phalanx wrote:
greenyellow wrote:Sounds like Portland was really burning up the phone lines looking to make some deals but couldn't find one they liked. It does look like Dame is okay with them picking Sharpe.
Oh man, what a relief! I was on pins and needles wondering how Dame felt about the team keeping a draft pick once every few years to maybe have a future after he is done being overpaid.
Your hate for Dame is just so weird.
Whatever, I find your Lillard idolatry equally weird. The man has basically hamstrung the team his entire career. Anyone with sense would watch first round exits year after year, culminating in this year's lottery and question if we should still be bowing to everything Lillard wants. Unlike Lillard, I am from Oregon, and I would like my team to actually be good at some point.
Last edited by Phalanx on Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35678
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Not sure why you think I somehow idolize him when I'm just posting things about the situation in Portland, which still includes Dame (no matter how much you bitch and moan and be all negative.) It's not Lillard's fault that Olshey was an awful GM when it came to the draft, free agency, putting accurate value on the team's players, and being an honest, decent person.
Image
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by Phalanx »

Someday, I think this picture will have great historical significance for the Blazers, if they are smart enough to hold on to Sharpe through all of this jockeying for control.

Last edited by Phalanx on Sun Jul 03, 2022 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 10565
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Blazers/NBA 2021-2022 Thread

Post by buckmarkduck »

Phalanx wrote:
buckmarkduck wrote:
No late 1st is going to put up Grants number. Basically anything outside the lottery is like trading a 3-4 round NFL pick. 2nd round picks are like 5-7th rounders in the NFL draft.
Is this a good time to point out that Grant himself was a second-round pick?

Anyway, I don't think this trade is as obviously bad as, say, signing Evan Turner. I just hate to see picks going out every year for middling players just to keep Lillard happy. I'm really glad it looks like they are keeping Sharpe, and they drafted the project post player as I suspected they would. I don't get the trade of pick 46 for what looks like a worse pick in two years...that makes me think it was Portland's idea to ditch the pick. I've never seen a present pick going for a worse future pick before, and I keep hoping there was more to that trade than is being reported. Nobody asked about it in the presser.

So many times, I came away from Olshey drafts disappointed or angry. I feel like this draft was more of a sensible, if unspectacular draft process. They are taking a risk with Sharpe compared to who else was available, but there are rumblings that he could be a really good player, so hopefully it works out.

For every 1 Grant I can point out 1000 2nd rounders who did nothing.
Post Reply