1998 Draft Discussion

Oregon Ownage · Post by **Oregon Ownage** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 3:40 pm

offtheheezy wrote:Thread is locked but I can pick whenever

Im editing the draft order

Oregon Ownage · Post by **Oregon Ownage** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 3:47 pm

Oregon Ownage wrote:
offtheheezy wrote:Thread is locked but I can pick whenever
Im editing the draft order

Unlocked

JB · Post by JB » Mon Sep 12, 2022 6:20 pm

And now we wait until tomorrow. Pistons GM hasn't been on in 6 days

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 6:33 pm

Ha ^

VC dropping

DrBradBuss · Post by **DrBradBuss** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:28 pm

JB wrote:And now we wait until tomorrow. Pistons GM hasn't been on in 6 days

Gonna wait until tomorrow at the last possible minute cause of this comment

dd10snoop28 · Post by **dd10snoop28** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:29 pm

DrBradBuss wrote:
JB wrote:And now we wait until tomorrow. Pistons GM hasn't been on in 6 days
Gonna wait until tomorrow at the last possible minute cause of this comment

lol

DrBradBuss · Post by **DrBradBuss** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:30 pm

dd10snoop28 wrote:
DrBradBuss wrote:
JB wrote:And now we wait until tomorrow. Pistons GM hasn't been on in 6 days
Gonna wait until tomorrow at the last possible minute cause of this comment
lol

I'm serious.
Plus I've got offers coming in.

DrBradBuss · Post by **DrBradBuss** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 7:30 pm

VC has no potential?

Craig · Post by **Craig** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 8:12 pm

DrBradBuss wrote:
JB wrote:And now we wait until tomorrow. Pistons GM hasn't been on in 6 days
Gonna wait until tomorrow at the last possible minute cause of this comment

I knew it as soon as I saw it

jibbajabba614 · Post by **jibbajabba614** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 9:45 pm

DrBradBuss wrote:VC has no potential?

My bad. He would of gotten the Amazing potential due to being top tier prospect but I did mention his future is uncertain. But I get the worry about amazing raw potential grade. He’s got a lot of athleticism but with a B+ inside, he can score inside too

jibbajabba614 · Post by **jibbajabba614** » Mon Sep 12, 2022 11:29 pm

Honestly biggest surprise was Bibby over VC. Rightfully so due to notes. Most GM’s would of went VC at 3 but Tk listen to notes. Always trying to help fellow GM’s…

We put them up for newer GM’s though

Zyme · Post by **Zyme** » Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:28 am

jibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly biggest surprise was Bibby over VC. Rightfully so due to notes. Most GM’s would of went VC at 3 but Tk listen to notes. Always trying to help fellow GM’s…

We put them up for newer GM’s though

Components of inside grade:
Inside scoring+
Strength (affects defensive ratings as well)++
Jumping (dunking)+++

Effect on scoring:
Inside Scoring +++
Strength +
Jumping +

The aspect that actually does the bulk of the heavy lifting in scoring doesn't reflect heavily on the grade. Bottom line is athletic players that are not given corresponding good inside finishing (inside scoring), will look great letter grade wise, but may never translate into great stats.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Tue Sep 13, 2022 8:16 am

Harrington at 5 is surprising. I thought he would be there at 8

pistolpetejr · Post by **pistolpetejr** » Tue Sep 13, 2022 8:26 am

lukeyrid13 wrote:Harrington at 5 is surprising. I thought he would be there at 8

Makes sense to me. JB likes to take risks on draft picks; I got that impression last year with SJax.

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:04 am

jibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly biggest surprise was Bibby over VC. Rightfully so due to notes. Most GM’s would of went VC at 3 but Tk listen to notes. Always trying to help fellow GM’s…

We put them up for newer GM’s though

Bibby: Good at everything, amazing potential, May end up being best player in draft
VC: high explosiveness and high athleticism (aka rating inflation), unknown whether he can score or not, and can’t shoot 3s. Oh and just as bad rebounder as Bibby.

I wouldn’t even take VC at 4 with those notes.

1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion

Re: 1998 Draft Discussion