It puts things in perspective when you look at the Indiana- North Texas box score.
Go to the team stats and put your finger over the names in the top of the columns. Then read the stats from 1st downs all the way to TOP.
Then tell me which team had 52 and which team had 16.
Would you have rather had BSU beat us in every major statistical category and still beat them by 36?
Or would you rather have completely dominated them statistically and only won by 7?
The reality is, based on the stats, the scores of the IU-NT and UO-BSU game should be switched.
Look at the box score from IU’s game
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
bdkipe
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 4:09 pm
-
alxtw
- Freshman
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm
Re: Look at the box score from IU’s game
I would prefer to have “BSU beat us in every major statistical category and still beat them by 36?”bdkipe wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2026 9:30 pm It puts things in perspective when you look at the Indiana- North Texas box score.
Go to the team stats and put your finger over the names in the top of the columns. Then read the stats from 1st downs all the way to TOP.
Then tell me which team had 52 and which team had 16.
Would you have rather had BSU beat us in every major statistical category and still beat them by 36?
Or would you rather have completely dominated them statistically and only won by 7?
The reality is, based on the stats, the scores of the IU-NT and UO-BSU game should be switched.
This shows a very efficient and discipline team. A team that dominated the opponent, scored at will, and prevented the opponent from scoring TDs.
“Or would you rather have completely dominated them statistically and only won by 7?”
This type of game stat lines is more alarming. A team that has done so much more than its opponent but has only beat them by 7.
- pudgejeff
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
- GM: Sacramento Kings GM
Re: Look at the box score from IU’s game
I'm really unsure how you come to either of those conclusions.alxtw wrote: Mon Sep 07, 2026 12:50 amI would prefer to have “BSU beat us in every major statistical category and still beat them by 36?”bdkipe wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2026 9:30 pm It puts things in perspective when you look at the Indiana- North Texas box score.
Go to the team stats and put your finger over the names in the top of the columns. Then read the stats from 1st downs all the way to TOP.
Then tell me which team had 52 and which team had 16.
Would you have rather had BSU beat us in every major statistical category and still beat them by 36?
Or would you rather have completely dominated them statistically and only won by 7?
The reality is, based on the stats, the scores of the IU-NT and UO-BSU game should be switched.
This shows a very efficient and discipline team. A team that dominated the opponent, scored at will, and prevented the opponent from scoring TDs.
“Or would you rather have completely dominated them statistically and only won by 7?”
This type of game stat lines is more alarming. A team that has done so much more than its opponent but has only beat them by 7.
-
RebelDuck
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:54 am
Re: Look at the box score from IU’s game
Means nothing