#24 Washington @ #6 Oregon (Nov. 12, Sat 4 PM Fox)

[squintsdd]

That was an INT...Gonzo was down with possession.

He never had full possession. Good call not to challenge

[OfaFeather]

Failure of the refs (unless they are in the bag for this game), and coaches not to call on that play.

That should have at least been reviewed.

[Tray Dub]

Christian Gonzales is a beast. Wish we had him for his whole career.

[pdxduck2013]

That was an INT...Gonzo was down with possession.

He never had full possession. Good call not to challenge

UW receiver only had part of one hand touching the ball and Gonzalez had both hands on it when he was down. It's either an INT or incomplete.

[OregonFan4Life]

It was clearly a pick, but Gonzalez gotta treat that ball like it’s his child and pull it in.

[Tray Dub]

Hard to say. Gonzales definitely had *more* of the possession but it was always a little joint. Could have gone either way, would bet against it being overturned but they should've gone through replay.

[squintsdd]

That was an INT...Gonzo was down with possession.

He never had full possession. Good call not to challenge

UW receiver only had part of one hand touching the ball and Gonzalez had both hands on it when he was down. It's either an INT or incomplete.

Ball never touched the ground and neither had full possession. Two hands on the ball does not mean full possession

[rockthief]

score7 do it

[rockthief]

was that a fair catch at the two?

[pdxduck2013]

That was an INT...Gonzo was down with possession.

He never had full possession. Good call not to challenge

UW receiver only had part of one hand touching the ball and Gonzalez had both hands on it when he was down. It's either an INT or incomplete.

Ball never touched the ground and neither had full possession. Two hands on the ball does not mean full possession

You should go back and rewatch that play on DVR. With part of the ball touching the ground, the only possible outcomes are INT or incomplete. If he didn't have possession then it was an incomplete pass. If he did, it's an INT.

[OregonFan4Life]

was that a fair catch at the two?

Yes, if you fair catch a kickoff inside the 25 it’s the same as a touchback.

[Tray Dub]

was that a fair catch at the two?

Newer rule, you can fair catch anywhere on kickoffs and it counts as a touchback.

[rockthief]

ah, thank you gentlemen.

[OregonFan4Life]

Outside of the Georgia game this was probably the worst half by Oregon this season and it probably isn’t even close. Playcalling and coaching decisions have been iffy, Nix looks nervous and off, and OLine isn’t playing well.

[squintsdd]

That was an INT...Gonzo was down with possession.

He never had full possession. Good call not to challenge

UW receiver only had part of one hand touching the ball and Gonzalez had both hands on it when he was down. It's either an INT or incomplete.

Ball never touched the ground and neither had full possession. Two hands on the ball does not mean full possession

You should go back and rewatch that play on DVR. With part of the ball touching the ground, the only possible outcomes are INT or incomplete. If he didn't have possession then it was an incomplete pass. If he did, it's an INT.

I want Oregon to win too, but my God, stop being a Homer. That ball can bounce around twenty times and hit every hand on the field without touching the ground and still be a catch for Washington. He never had full control before it got pulled away from him