Page 9 of 9

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:29 pm
by Cellar-door
Very happy with my Crawford pick....

He went from:C+ B C- B C C to C+ B C- A- C C when I moved him to SF. The equivalent of a +2 TC before TC even starts. That kind of defense means even if he doesn't do anything in TC he's still a decent bench player for a mid-2nd.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:07 pm
by Zyme
Sf prioritizes dif stats for the letter grade, nothing actually changed

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:55 pm
by Cellar-door
Zyme wrote:Sf prioritizes dif stats for the letter grade, nothing actually changed
Oh I know nothing changed in the numbers, but my guess when I picked him is that being at PF made him look worse than SF would, if he'd had an A- at Defense I would guess he goes higher. That nothing went down tells me that vs. SFs he'll perform better than if I left him at PF. The risk was that he didn't have the quickness to do well against SF, but the rating change tells me that he's now a SF with good or better quickness and good strength for the position, where at PF he likely had below average strength.

Re: 1997 Draft Discussion

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:12 pm
by Craig
A pioneer...