Still no deal.
Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40708
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39357
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
- Alan
- Senior
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 2:17 pm
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
So another “nothing to see here”? Sad…..
- pezsez1
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6450
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
- Location: RIP CITY
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Nice update from JC. That said, I wouldn't consider "final approval" to be as clean as it sounds. That could be PR-speak for "Arizona is leaving, and we'd rather they go first so the rest of us could approve this unanimously and officially have their stuff."
But "excited and aligned" is definitely better than "wandering naked and alone in the dark" so that's something.
But "excited and aligned" is definitely better than "wandering naked and alone in the dark" so that's something.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
- DuckMastaFunk
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
If the Pac is falling apart, Canzano's sources (likely high ranking people in the ADs) have zero interest in it falling apart before they have secured a landing spot. We have no idea if this report is accurate or AD posturing.greenyellow wrote:
-
SuperDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:29 am
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
I don't see Arizona leaving without ASU. They more or less have a vested interest in each other.pezsez1 wrote:Nice update from JC. That said, I wouldn't consider "final approval" to be as clean as it sounds. That could be PR-speak for "Arizona is leaving, and we'd rather they go first so the rest of us could approve this unanimously and officially have their stuff."
But "excited and aligned" is definitely better than "wandering naked and alone in the dark" so that's something.
Them leaving could encourage Utah to leave, as well. That would hurt.
John 3:36
- DuckMastaFunk
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Also, the idea that the representatives at the meeting didn't have authority to approve a deal over a certain dollar figure is strange. I mean, they all knew what would be happening during this meeting, right?
- pezsez1
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6450
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
- Location: RIP CITY
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
That's partly why I think this may be PR-speak for "let Arizona (and maybe others) go and then the rest of us can get this moving."Also, the idea that the representatives at the meeting didn't have authority to approve a deal over a certain dollar figure is strange. I mean, they all knew what would be happening during this meeting, right?
Willie Taggart is a dick.
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39357
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Only the streaming portion has somewhat leaked but the linear side still seems up in the air.

-
GDuck
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:32 pm
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Streaming only would be terrible for the conference.
- pezsez1
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6450
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
- Location: RIP CITY
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
I love the idea of mostly streaming. Accessible anywhere. Cheap. No need for so many night games. Can improve the stadium product. It is the future. Production and content quality would be top notch. Much better than being cable's nighttime fallback.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39357
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
This news of the streaming component sucks because it actually makes MHver3 look right when all he's been doing is throwing out rumors after reading multiple message boards and hoping something he regurgitated stuck.

-
GDuck
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:32 pm
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Not surprising we disagree. Steaming is losing money all over the place - Netflix is really the only one consistently making money. Those that don’t will not survive. Not cheap if you need to buy it along with your cable/dish/other streaming services. Not sure about night games - Pac-12 has a monopoly at 7pm and would be foolish to give that up.pezsez1 wrote:I love the idea of mostly streaming. Accessible anywhere. Cheap. No need for so many night games. Can improve the stadium product. It is the future.
Can’t flip between games easily. For Amazon NFL there were buffering/quality issues and the video was delayed quite a bit from the real time events. Number of eyes on the games will be a lot less and the conference/teams won’t be talked about as much. Pre and post game shows attention will be much reduced. I’m okay with a combo of steaming and linear.
When they final figure out how to make money streaming, the conference won’t be around.
-
justin_f
- Two Star Recruit
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:03 pm
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
Don't know a single person irl excited about streaming. Will be a disaster with every duck fan I knowpezsez1 wrote:I love the idea of mostly streaming. Accessible anywhere. Cheap. No need for so many night games. Can improve the stadium product. It is the future. Production and content quality would be top notch. Much better than being cable's nighttime fallback.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
- pezsez1
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6450
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
- Location: RIP CITY
Re: Pac-12/Big 10/Big 12 Realignment
We know different Duck fans then. I don't know anyone who doesn't stream something. And cable is slowly dying among younger audiences.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
