Page 2 of 2

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:26 pm
by R bar Duckaholic
At least it's named after a Duck Alum.....

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:27 pm
by Braveheart
UOducksTK1 wrote:
Braveheart wrote:
UOducksTK1 wrote:Sure a Chrysler 300 might look like a Bentley, but no comparison.
I'm not and haven't compared it with UO's facilities.
But in general, it's pretty natural when new uniforms / facilities come around to compare to Oregon. Just wanted to establish our prestige in those areas.

If you must.

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:33 pm
by Braveheart
R bar Duckaholic wrote:At least it's named after a Duck Alum.....
How do you think we got all the cool Nike stuff in there? :lol:
hearing the security isn't all that good at the new facilities though braveheart. Wow already had 5 laptops stolen, ipads and a wallet.
I only remember taking 4.

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:48 pm
by RanDux
Very nice. Not that you needed any more "help in recruiting." Do you think it has been a factor in this year's standout class?

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:23 pm
by Elduderino
Braveheart wrote:
R bar Duckaholic wrote:At least it's named after a Duck Alum.....
How do you think we got all the cool Nike stuff in there? :lol:
hearing the security isn't all that good at the new facilities though braveheart. Wow already had 5 laptops stolen, ipads and a wallet.
I only remember taking 4.
Jeremiah? I thought you were in Canada?

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:47 pm
by buckmarkduck
Masoli? My guess it was Mora hoping to get the SC play book, plus show how bad a neighborhood SC is in.

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:16 pm
by Braveheart
RanDux wrote:Very nice. Not that you needed any more "help in recruiting." Do you think it has been a factor in this year's standout class?
It's more of icing on the cake if anything (IMO).

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:37 pm
by uodux1212
Braveheart wrote:
RanDux wrote:Braveheart, who are the guys in your signature?
The Detroit Spinners

Could it be I'm falling in love, witchyou baby!

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:16 pm
by RanDux
uodux1212 wrote:
Braveheart wrote:
RanDux wrote:Braveheart, who are the guys in your signature?
The Detroit Spinners

Could it be I'm falling in love, witchyou baby!
Ah yes. Good stuff!

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:23 pm
by Braveheart
uodux1212 wrote:
Braveheart wrote:
RanDux wrote:Braveheart, who are the guys in your signature?
The Detroit Spinners

Could it be I'm falling in love, witchyou baby!
Congratulations! Tell 'em what he's won, Bob!

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:59 am
by briarduck
Very nice indeed...but I have to ask, why an indoor practice facility isn't that for program trying to avoid the elements? I thought it was funny because I lived in LA and weather is not the problem...but I will assume its because every other team has one and SC is trying to counter/match other programs.

Good stuff Braveheart, it just got tougher to recruit against you...it was already hard enough.

Re: Facilities no longer a weakness for USC

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:30 am
by Braveheart
briarduck wrote:Very nice indeed...but I have to ask, why an indoor practice facility isn't that for program trying to avoid the elements? I thought it was funny because I lived in LA and weather is not the problem...but I will assume its because every other team has one and SC is trying to counter/match other programs.

Good stuff Braveheart, it just got tougher to recruit against you...it was already hard enough.

Yeah, I thought it was standard. Plus, that isn't a full indoor field. USC still practices outside.