Top 50 Trade Value

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15300
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by Oregon Ownage »

Fat lever needs to be in the same category with Thomas and Magic

Dude just performs and keeps TO's down
Image
User avatar
vincent1469
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:24 pm
GM: Seattle Supersonics

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by vincent1469 »

Damn this most recent TC shot down Wayman’s value
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

vincent1469 wrote:Damn this most recent TC shot down Wayman’s value
I think so. A year ago he would have been much higher on this list sadly.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Oregon Ownage wrote:Fat lever needs to be in the same category with Thomas and Magic

Dude just performs and keeps TO's down
His PPG has dipped down to only 10. I actually originally had him sorted with the 'Top PG" list but then dropped him down about 8 spots. I can definitely see justifying bumping him up though
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5676
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by Boom »

dd10snoop28 wrote:46. Tom Chambers - Rockets
45. Trent Tucker – Hawks

Both guys that are worth their contract iMO and should be ranked higher.
Agreed... Pretty laughable to think those are bad contracts.

Tucker is a lot closer to Byron Scott than to Clyde Drexler.

Chambers is in his prime and has been one of the most efficient offensive forwards in the game.

Joe Barry Carroll should probably be higher as well.

Byron Scott seems a little overrated.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

JayGreen wrote:Was hoping to see Salley in that 33-43 range. No Dailey either hmm.
If Salley had A potential I'd probably feel different.

Dailey was an omission for sure, especially on a great contract long term.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

Boom wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:46. Tom Chambers - Rockets
45. Trent Tucker – Hawks

Both guys that are worth their contract iMO and should be ranked higher.
Agreed... Pretty laughable to think those are bad contracts.

Tucker is a lot closer to Byron Scott than to Clyde Drexler.

Chambers is in his prime and has been one of the most efficient offensive forwards in the game.

Joe Barry Carroll should probably be higher as well.

Byron Scott seems a little overrated.
They're in the top 50, so that section definitely isn't bad players, but guys that either are, or will be taking up 50% of the soft cap at some point and aren't surefire All-stars do and should hold less value than a top producing guy on a rookie scale deal.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

As for Joe Barry Carroll, I for some reason thought he was past 30. At age 28, he should be higher on the list, so I agree.
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5409
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by Zyme »

Moses is a Center straight out of the 1960s (when rebounds were 55-65 a game) with a modern shooting average.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
User avatar
Craig
Senior
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
GM: Phoenix Suns GM

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by Craig »

Not really sure i get having Thorpe, Drexler, or McNamara even in the honorable mentions. They're pretty run of the mill role players.

Tucker isnt a great defender but is a pretty transformative offensive player and someone I'd value higher than a lot of guys ahead of him.

Carroll in the same tier as Laimbeer is insulting to Joe lol.

D Young, Malone, Stockton, Perkins all seem very high as well.

I'd have Jordan over Drazen and probly Barkley too.

Are we sure Hakeem wouldn't fetch more in a trade than Moses? Moses obviously better, but just asking lol.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
SUNS GM
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

^ Yep I missed on Joe Barry. I somehow mixed up his age and had him at 32 in my notes, not 28.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

+5 Michael Jordan
jump shot
inside scoring

if neither of those work I'll think of another choice
User avatar
dd10snoop28
Senior
Posts: 4821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
GM: New Jersey Nets GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by dd10snoop28 »

Good topic for article btw. Produces good discussion.
Image
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10484
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by lukeyrid13 »

dd10snoop28 wrote:Good topic for article btw. Produces good discussion.
I’d almost like to see a whole article just nitpicking or re-doing my rankings for someone else’s. It’s all so subjective too on what we all value.
Skyhooker
Junior
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:29 pm
GM: Philadelphia 76ers

Re: Top 50 Trade Value

Post by Skyhooker »

Craig wrote:
Are we sure Hakeem wouldn't fetch more in a trade than Moses? Moses obviously better, but just asking lol.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Maybe at the end of this season I'll put Moses on the block and test that out....
Post Reply