Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

The Bean Regime wrote:Bogues is imo the first "big" drop off in talent as far as the picks go.

I don't think I would have gone Gilliam over the two excellent PGs but that's probably just preference.

Yeah it was either Smith, KJ or Gilliam. I just didn’t feel Smith would fit with Curry. KJ is more suited for a balance offense. Hopefully Gilliam pairs good with Rodman.

jibbajabba614 wrote:

Craig wrote:Some of these draft notes are in direct contradiction with what these guys actually did in their careers so it's throwing me for a loop lol.

Also Ownage I can't believe you would snap up KJ instead of letting him come home.

Gives you an idea of how they simmed and how their ratings are.

For instance I had to decrease Pippen’s outside when the game kept moving him to SG, he was like Melo DASL 1.0. I do check out their wikis and rankings usually go by RL draft results. Then start working on ratings.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

Thought the Bucks would take KJ, but no real big surprises so far.

Also go read my article previewing free agency: http://www.ducksattack.com/forum/viewto ... 41&t=36536

jibbajabba614 wrote:

Craig wrote:Some of these draft notes are in direct contradiction with what these guys actually did in their careers so it's throwing me for a loop lol.

Also Ownage I can't believe you would snap up KJ instead of letting him come home.

Gives you an idea of how they simmed and how their ratings are.

For instance I had to decrease Pippen’s outside when the game kept moving him to SG, he was like Melo DASL 1.0. I do check out their wikis and rankings usually go by RL draft results. Then start working on ratings.

Wasnt a criticism, sorry if it came off that way. Just something that was causing my brain to pull in multiple directions, make the choices harder (for me at least).

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

No I didn’t take it as that. When doing rankings, on Kenny Smith’s report, he was a ball dominant guard but on notes he is better suited for a ball dominant shooting guard. Really just might what if the Jet had young Clyde. Points in 90’s controlled ball unless you were mike. 2000’s everyone was trying to be mike lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't remember seeing "Elite" potential before.
Is that a new term?

DrBradBuss wrote:I don't remember seeing "Elite" potential before.
Is that a new term?

Top end in terms of potential

It gets boring using the same lingo so changing it up some

SO with the Hawks up I realized something fun......

Hawks literally cannot make all of their 1st round picks. They only have 2 open roster spots, they need to trade or drop a player between now and the last pick of the 1st.

Cellar-door wrote:SO with the Hawks up I realized something fun......

Hawks literally cannot make all of their 1st round picks. They only have 2 open roster spots, they need to trade or drop a player between now and the last pick of the 1st.

Yep, they need to cash in their chips.

I noticed that during the resign stage with the number of players they had

Hawks have had like 18 hours....

lukeyrid13 wrote:Hawks have had like 18 hours....

I dont count overnight, not fair to people

I "stop" the clock around 9/9:30 PM ET and it resumes again at 12 PM ET

It tough with be people on both coasts so those times are good middle grounds

Craig wrote:

Oregon Ownage wrote:T

FYI...not to be a stickler over a couple spots, but it should be PHX at #34 and VAN and #37, as the SEA 2nd is what was sent to VAN in this trade. (http://www.ducksattack.com/forum/viewto ... 27&t=36472)

Fixed

Great trade for pistons at 13 IMO

Oof, thought for sure Sarunas was going to make it to 17

I could definitely see Mark Jackson being the steal here...Pacers w/ him + Admiral is a nice haul I think.