MBB: Oregon @ Washington (Mar. 3, Thu 7 PM Pac-12 Network)
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
-
Everythingsducky
- Senior
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:40 pm
Re: MBB: Oregon @ Washington (Mar. 3, Thu 7 PM Pac-12 Networ
Not that it hasn’t been screamed ad nauseum, but Will Richardson, in two games the Ducks HAD to have, is found cowering in a corner, sucking his thumb. Mental midget to say the least.
- dd10snoop28
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- dd10snoop28
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: MBB: Oregon @ Washington (Mar. 3, Thu 7 PM Pac-12 Networ
ehhh, that team didn't real come together until the last few games of the season. We had chemistry issues for most of the season and relied too much on PP hero-ball during the regular season.Tray Dub wrote:It wasn't just Pritchard going off, that team had actual chemistry. This team isn't an actual team. Fundamental difference.

- OregonFan4Life
- All-American
- Posts: 15153
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:32 pm
Re: MBB: Oregon @ Washington (Mar. 3, Thu 7 PM Pac-12 Networ
Though as great as Pritchard was he wasn’t the best for team chemistry. He was too ball dominant at times which did occasionally hurt the team but also helped. Great duck but not the best teammate. I kept posting that season to put Pritchard at SG cause he plays like a SG more than a PG and put Will Richardson at PG. While I want Richardson to have the confidence of Pritchard I don’t want him to be as ball dominant, we have enough ball hogs on the team as is right now, especially with Jacob Young aka the college version of Russel Westbrook who thinks he can go 1v4.dd10snoop28 wrote:ehhh, that team didn't real come together until the last few games of the season. We had chemistry issues for most of the season and relied too much on PP hero-ball during the regular season.Tray Dub wrote:It wasn't just Pritchard going off, that team had actual chemistry. This team isn't an actual team. Fundamental difference.

- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39218
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: MBB: Oregon @ Washington (Mar. 3, Thu 7 PM Pac-12 Networ
At least with that team, they had a few players who could make shots when Pritchard did pass it. Having Duarte and Mathis helped take the scoring load off him at times. This season is probably the first team in a while that doesn't have multiple players who can create their own shot and/or be a sniper from deep. Altman has to do a better job at finding a decent sharpshooters.OregonFan4Life wrote:Though as great as Pritchard was he wasn’t the best for team chemistry. He was too ball dominant at times which did occasionally hurt the team but also helped. Great duck but not the best teammate. I kept posting that season to put Pritchard at SG cause he plays like a SG more than a PG and put Will Richardson at PG. While I want Richardson to have the confidence of Pritchard I don’t want him to be as ball dominant, we have enough ball hogs on the team as is right now, especially with Jacob Young aka the college version of Russel Westbrook who thinks he can go 1v4.dd10snoop28 wrote:ehhh, that team didn't real come together until the last few games of the season. We had chemistry issues for most of the season and relied too much on PP hero-ball during the regular season.Tray Dub wrote:It wasn't just Pritchard going off, that team had actual chemistry. This team isn't an actual team. Fundamental difference.

- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4516
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: MBB: Oregon @ Washington (Mar. 3, Thu 7 PM Pac-12 Networ
Truth don't give a **** about your feelings.dd10snoop28 wrote:that's harsh. true, but harsh.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine