This is how I feel. Chip is very good after BYEs and he's operating at a high level right now.karlhungis wrote:UCLA is legit as well. I have more faith in Chip coming off of a bye week than Lanning. With how unprepared we were for Georgia, I don't have a lot of faith that we will take full advantage of the bye week.pezsez1 wrote:I'm super confident in this game. Oregon is legit. I didn't think I'd be saying that before the start of the season (especially not after the Georgia debacle) but this team is special. Sneaky good. Maybe even good enough to win a playoff game.
I think we run the table and win the Pac-12 title. Our schedule shapes up so nicely from here on out.
#9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40701
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Wow. New coaches, new system, new QB, 10 days practice in pads and playing the defending champs in Atlanta? What exactly did you expect? I was hoping we would stay within 28. Wow.karlhungis wrote:UCLA is legit as well. I have more faith in Chip coming off of a bye week than Lanning. With how unprepared we were for Georgia, I don't have a lot of faith that we will take full advantage of the bye week.pezsez1 wrote:I'm super confident in this game. Oregon is legit. I didn't think I'd be saying that before the start of the season (especially not after the Georgia debacle) but this team is special. Sneaky good. Maybe even good enough to win a playoff game.
I think we run the table and win the Pac-12 title. Our schedule shapes up so nicely from here on out.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
-
karlhungis
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:08 am
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
And we weren't even close to what you hoped. Wow.......nogerO wrote:Wow. New coaches, new system, new QB, 10 days practice in pads and playing the defending champs in Atlanta? What exactly did you expect? I was hoping we would stay within 28. Wow.karlhungis wrote:UCLA is legit as well. I have more faith in Chip coming off of a bye week than Lanning. With how unprepared we were for Georgia, I don't have a lot of faith that we will take full advantage of the bye week.pezsez1 wrote:I'm super confident in this game. Oregon is legit. I didn't think I'd be saying that before the start of the season (especially not after the Georgia debacle) but this team is special. Sneaky good. Maybe even good enough to win a playoff game.
I think we run the table and win the Pac-12 title. Our schedule shapes up so nicely from here on out.
OregonFan4life -
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
My source just said Chip is officially back!
It will be announced at Autzen press conference tomorrow afternoon!
-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8800
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
I’m curious why 1 game, the first of Lanning’s HC career and the staff’s as a whole, outweighs the 5 where we’ve shown to be exceptionally coached and prepared? Georgia knew exactly what we were running on D, no other team will have that advantage.
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

-
GrandpaDuck
- Senior
- Posts: 3312
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:48 pm
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
I'm hoping with the extra time Chip outsmarts himself like he did with all the time before the Auburn NC game. I'm sure his anti-spread packed formation was not what Auburn expected at all, the problem was it sucked as was his decision to read Farley instead of the ends. Too much time for the active mind can be a bad thing (I hope).
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40701
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Not even factoring in the Georgia game, I still think is a toss up game. CK is deadly when he's on a roll. And he hasn't been on a roll in a long time, so for now I have to assume he'll be operating as the CK of old, which is insanely effective offensively. Our defense will have to have an A- game or better for me to think we will win. Anything less than that, then it makes me nervous this will be a 40+ point shootout where a couple turnovers or 4th down conversions will make or break the game. Making it more of a toss up then I'd hope for a top 10 Oregon team hosting anyone.dthomas=ddixon wrote:I’m curious why 1 game, the first of Lanning’s HC career and the staff’s as a whole, outweighs the 5 where we’ve shown to be exceptionally coached and prepared? Georgia knew exactly what we were running on D, no other team will have that advantage.
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- Weston
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:51 pm
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
I second that. Especially the secondary. And Sewell and Flowe need to at least start to fulfill their potential.wlduck wrote:I'm confidant about this game, but the defense needs to improve for me to feel as confidant as you are overall.
-
ducks5ever
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 pm
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
It's not necessarily fair to give the first game as much weight as you're saying. However, Georgia has been the only tier 1 CFB opponent we've faced all season, and it is fair to make comparisons to how we'll perform this weekend with respect to Georgia (and not BYU/Eastern Washington/Arizona).dthomas=ddixon wrote:I’m curious why 1 game, the first of Lanning’s HC career and the staff’s as a whole, outweighs the 5 where we’ve shown to be exceptionally coached and prepared? Georgia knew exactly what we were running on D, no other team will have that advantage.
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not 100% sold on Bo Nix given his inconsistent past, and the only time he was under pressure to make plays (albeit against one of the best defenses in the country), he couldn't make them. Personally, I think we have a good shot to win this weekend, but it's far from a shoo-in
-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Chip hasn’t been deadly since 2012.UOducksTK1 wrote:Not even factoring in the Georgia game, I still think is a toss up game. CK is deadly when he's on a roll. And he hasn't been on a roll in a long time, so for now I have to assume he'll be operating as the CK of old, which is insanely effective offensively. Our defense will have to have an A- game or better for me to think we will win. Anything less than that, then it makes me nervous this will be a 40+ point shootout where a couple turnovers or 4th down conversions will make or break the game. Making it more of a toss up then I'd hope for a top 10 Oregon team hosting anyone.dthomas=ddixon wrote:I’m curious why 1 game, the first of Lanning’s HC career and the staff’s as a whole, outweighs the 5 where we’ve shown to be exceptionally coached and prepared? Georgia knew exactly what we were running on D, no other team will have that advantage.
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8800
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Yeah I just think it’s a lot of hype. They have 1 good win. They played great against Utah but also needed a FG as time expired to beat Georgia Southern at home. The UW win looked great at the time but beating them by 8 isn’t an impressive win at all now. UCLA is clearly a good team but nothing to be afraid of, especially at home.UOducksTK1 wrote:Not even factoring in the Georgia game, I still think is a toss up game. CK is deadly when he's on a roll. And he hasn't been on a roll in a long time, so for now I have to assume he'll be operating as the CK of old, which is insanely effective offensively. Our defense will have to have an A- game or better for me to think we will win. Anything less than that, then it makes me nervous this will be a 40+ point shootout where a couple turnovers or 4th down conversions will make or break the game. Making it more of a toss up then I'd hope for a top 10 Oregon team hosting anyone.dthomas=ddixon wrote:I’m curious why 1 game, the first of Lanning’s HC career and the staff’s as a whole, outweighs the 5 where we’ve shown to be exceptionally coached and prepared? Georgia knew exactly what we were running on D, no other team will have that advantage.
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8800
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
I’m saying we shouldn’t give that game much weight.ducks5ever wrote:It's not necessarily fair to give the first game as much weight as you're saying. However, Georgia has been the only tier 1 CFB opponent we've faced all season, and it is fair to make comparisons to how we'll perform this weekend with respect to Georgia (and not BYU/Eastern Washington/Arizona).dthomas=ddixon wrote:I’m curious why 1 game, the first of Lanning’s HC career and the staff’s as a whole, outweighs the 5 where we’ve shown to be exceptionally coached and prepared? Georgia knew exactly what we were running on D, no other team will have that advantage.
I get the respect for Chip but he’s been a mediocre head coach post-Oregon. He can still scheme up and call a game as good as anyone but they have to stop us first. Something no remaining defense has the ability to do without us beating ourselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not 100% sold on Bo Nix given his inconsistent past, and the only time he was under pressure to make plays (albeit against one of the best defenses in the country), he couldn't make them. Personally, I think we have a good shot to win this weekend, but it's far from a shoo-in
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

- pezsez1
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
- Location: RIP CITY
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Haha, really. You have that much more faith in the current-day Chip Kelly who needed a last-second FG to beat... hang on, let me look up the opponent... SOUTH ALABAMA for a one-point win? In WEEK THREE????I have more faith in Chip coming off of a bye week than Lanning. With how unprepared we were for Georgia, I don't have a lot of faith that we will take full advantage of the bye week.
That's a far bigger debacle than what happened to Oregon with an all-new scheme/staff against the defending national champs in week one.
I'll always love Chip, but this isn't 2011 and he doesn't have that ace up his sleeve. I'll gladly take Dan Lanning and how we've seen the Ducks rapidly improve with each game since Georgia.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Last year, Oregon beat UCLA 34-31 in Pasadena. It appears UCLA is a little bit better than they were then, while Oregon is quite a bit better than then. Plus this one's in Eugene.
Ducks by 10.
Ducks by 10.
-
lmduck
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 7:22 pm
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Why would Lanning have not taken advantage of the bye week???? The Georgia game and where this team is now are two pretty different things.karlhungis wrote:UCLA is legit as well. I have more faith in Chip coming off of a bye week than Lanning. With how unprepared we were for Georgia, I don't have a lot of faith that we will take full advantage of the bye week.pezsez1 wrote:I'm super confident in this game. Oregon is legit. I didn't think I'd be saying that before the start of the season (especially not after the Georgia debacle) but this team is special. Sneaky good. Maybe even good enough to win a playoff game.
I think we run the table and win the Pac-12 title. Our schedule shapes up so nicely from here on out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
GoDucks7
- One Star Recruit
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: #9 UCLA @ #10 Oregon (Oct. 22, Sat 12:30 PM Fox)
Chip Kelly hasn't done anything since he left Oregon in 2012. He's not the same coach as he was back then and I think this UCLA team is very overrated. They barely beat South Alabama at home. People keep calling Chip a genius when he really hasn't been a great coach for 10 years. In fact, he's been pretty awful overall and UCLA fans wanted him gone last year. Yeah they could come in and beat Oregon but I'm not as worried as a lot of others are in this thread.