James is just a journalist. I think the context matters too. People aren't going to enjoy hearing this but our SOS is pretty weak at this point. That factors into the statistics too. We have faced probably only 3 good offenses so far this season - UW, USC, and maybe Cal (but they're breaking in a freshman QB).Greenblood wrote:Interesting take given Crepea's article of last Thursday, the first two paragraphs of which read:ducks5ever wrote:I'm actually not feeling that great about our run defense. We gave up an average of 5 yards per attempt against UW and USC(I stripped out QB runs/sacks). I'm assuming OSU is similar to UW/USC in that they have a good QB (I could be wrong here) who can beat you through the air. If we let OSU sustain drives by pounding it out on the ground, this won't be pretty.
Now of course, I'm sure some will say that USC was behind so covering the pass was more important than covering the run. That said, the run defense actually has felt shaky.
The things that do work in our favor are 1. it's a home game, and 2. OSU is coming off a tough game against UW while our starters only played a half this past weekend coming into this shortened week.
Oregon’s ability to stop the run was a strength on an otherwise challenged defense last season. This season, the No. 6 Ducks are performing at an elite level and could end up as the best in program history.
Oregon (9-1, 6-1 Pac-12) enters Saturday’s game (1 p.m., Fox) at Arizona State No. 11 nationally in rushing yards allowed per game (95.1) and tied for 17th in yards allowed per carry (3.22), up from 31st and 74th, respectively, last season. Since 1952, the oldest program records that exist, UO’s season-best was in 1989 (101.8 rush ypg.).
OSU is probably our 2nd or 3rd toughest opponent this season so I think it makes more sense to look at how we did against UW/USC than to look at how we did against Utah/Stanford, etc.
I don't follow OSU football closely, but based on my recollection, they don't have as much talent as we do but they are well coached and have good fundamentals.



