Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

UOducksTK1 wrote:Cleaned up a lot of the more recent debate posts. Things were getting out of hand. You guys can talk politics, but try to keep those 5 pages posts aimed at out-debating another 5 page post out of here. No one is going to read your crap except you and the person you are talking to. If you really want to talk to that person, PM them or something.

Thanks.

Then they can either ignore this thread or start a new discussion. I'm trying to do something to keep some activity on this board and if I can't do that in this thread then I suppose its time to peace out until Fall Camp.

I know most of your are from, or living in Oregon and are strong liberal supporters, but I have to say it. Obama, and his entire administration sucks. Thank you. That is my contribution.

QuackininBama wrote:I know most of your are from, or living in Oregon and are strong liberal supporters, but I have to say it. Obama, and his entire administration sucks. Thank you. That is my contribution.

Well, I can see that you are an Alabama neo-con, so I just have to say it. The conservatives have screwed this country up. Thank you. That is my rebuttal.

Hows that for a short, concise argument?

To make another point, both parties have screwed the country up in their own and different ways so it's about equal.

QuackininBama wrote:I know most of your are from, or living in Oregon and are strong liberal supporters, but I have to say it. Obama, and his entire administration sucks. Thank you. That is my contribution.

If what you say above is true...

Then the 8 year Bush administration was a flaming wreck on broken axels.

Thanks.

Agreed about the Bush administration. However, Quackininbama never mentions any favorable opinion of Bush. You can't assume he likes the prior administration simply because he dislikes the current one.

Duck07 wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:Cleaned up a lot of the more recent debate posts. Things were getting out of hand. You guys can talk politics, but try to keep those 5 pages posts aimed at out-debating another 5 page post out of here. No one is going to read your crap except you and the person you are talking to. If you really want to talk to that person, PM them or something.

Thanks.

Then they can either ignore this thread or start a new discussion. I'm trying to do something to keep some activity on this board and if I can't do that in this thread then I suppose its time to peace out until Fall Camp.

I deleted a posts upon user request, because he wanted his posts removed. I think that's more than fair. And I disregard my bolded comment. Duck07 thread is free to practice quoting abuse.

greenyellow wrote:To make another point, both parties have screwed the country up in their own and different ways so it's about equal.

i agree with this

justducky0 wrote:

greenyellow wrote:To make another point, both parties have screwed the country up in their own and different ways so it's about equal.

i agree with this

I second that motion! But seriously, the two party system is awful and horribly inefficient.

goducks75 wrote:

justducky0 wrote:

greenyellow wrote:To make another point, both parties have screwed the country up in their own and different ways so it's about equal.

i agree with this

I second that motion! But seriously, the two party system is awful and horribly inefficient.

I agree, choosing the guy that sucks the least is not a efficient system....

goducks75 wrote:

justducky0 wrote:

greenyellow wrote:To make another point, both parties have screwed the country up in their own and different ways so it's about equal.

i agree with this

I second that motion! But seriously, the two party system is awful and horribly inefficient.

Wait, so your not in favor of checks and balances, rather you would replace this system with....what? A monarchy? Dictatorship? Socialism? Whats your replacement?

Any politician that wants to take away my reproductive rights needs to jump off a cliff. When a man can give birth to a child himself, then he can have a say on his own behalf. Until then, let women decide for themselves what is right for them.

That is all.

QuackininBama wrote:

goducks75 wrote:

justducky0 wrote:

greenyellow wrote:To make another point, both parties have screwed the country up in their own and different ways so it's about equal.

i agree with this

I second that motion! But seriously, the two party system is awful and horribly inefficient.

Wait, so your not in favor of checks and balances, rather you would replace this system with....what? A monarchy? Dictatorship? Socialism? Whats your replacement?

haha its funny because checks and balances does not have to do with a two party system...... where exactly does it talk about a two party system?

You going to answer the question or show us all how smart you are? Just answer the question? No need to whip out text books and essays and or things your teacher told you, just use your own judgement and what you would like to see to improve our political system. Don't overthink it, or feel the need to need to use fancy graphs and charts and statistics, just start writing.

Bama, your argument is flawed.

Goducks75 said: "But seriously, the two party system is awful and horribly inefficient."
Bama replied to that statement: "Wait, so your not in favor of checks and balances"

I am merely pointing out that being in favor or not of having a two party system has nothing to do with the system of checks and balances.