Re: NBA / Blazers Thread
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:45 pm
Meyer Leonard was playing out of position tonight. He does much better in the fetal position at the end of the bench.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
For everybody ragging on the Blazers bench, please consider the Spurs. They are generally recognized as having a strong bench. I see Patty Mills and Jeff (Pendergraph) Ayers as rotation guys. So don't tell me how great everyone elses benches are. Every team has a drop off the farther down the bench you go. But bench strength has as much to do with skill sets fitting rotations as with overall talent. To that end, Freeman, Williams, Robinson and maybe McCollough are all decent players. As evidenced by the melt down last night, they don't fit well as a complete unit (were was Earl Watson- they needed an experienced ball handler in that unit?).Boom wrote:It amazes me how bad Blazers 2nd unit is. How is Will Barton still in the NBA?
Patty Mills is a career 40% 3pt shooter and is a good fit to play off of Manu Ginobili in the 2nd unit. Borris Diaw & Marco Belini are both solid veterans that can play some D and get their own shots.wlduck wrote:For everybody ragging on the Blazers bench, please consider the Spurs. They are generally recognized as having a strong bench. I see Patty Mills and Jeff (Pendergraph) Ayers as rotation guys. So don't tell me how great everyone elses benches are. Every team has a drop off the farther down the bench you go. But bench strength has as much to do with skill sets fitting rotations as with overall talent. To that end, Freeman, Williams, Robinson and maybe McCollough are all decent players. As evidenced by the melt down last night, they don't fit well as a complete unit (were was Earl Watson- they needed an experienced ball handler in that unit?).Boom wrote:It amazes me how bad Blazers 2nd unit is. How is Will Barton still in the NBA?
I don't think Barton will ever be a rotation player on this team. I keep trying to convince myself Leonard may yet develop, but that gets harder to sell to myself every time they put him in.
My point is simply that everyone's bench, even the "good" ones, have flaws. You are referencing my exact point by pointing out Mills excellent three point shooting. He has a skill that fits a rotation. But he can't guard me.Boom wrote:Patty Mills is a career 40% 3pt shooter and is a good fit to play off of Manu Ginobili in the 2nd unit. Borris Diaw & Marco Belini are both solid veterans that can play some D and get their own shots.wlduck wrote:For everybody ragging on the Blazers bench, please consider the Spurs. They are generally recognized as having a strong bench. I see Patty Mills and Jeff (Pendergraph) Ayers as rotation guys. So don't tell me how great everyone elses benches are. Every team has a drop off the farther down the bench you go. But bench strength has as much to do with skill sets fitting rotations as with overall talent. To that end, Freeman, Williams, Robinson and maybe McCollough are all decent players. As evidenced by the melt down last night, they don't fit well as a complete unit (were was Earl Watson- they needed an experienced ball handler in that unit?).Boom wrote:It amazes me how bad Blazers 2nd unit is. How is Will Barton still in the NBA?
I don't think Barton will ever be a rotation player on this team. I keep trying to convince myself Leonard may yet develop, but that gets harder to sell to myself every time they put him in.
I don't see your comparison.
3 of 4 would be awesome. I heard lots of " don't be to concerned if they win 1/0 on this trip" from local media. This team just keeps exceeding expectations.thomas time wrote:Great start to the tough road trip, would be great to get at least one more.
The Nuggets left him open on the pick and pop. They kept doubling Lillard and he'd kick it back to LMA for wide open 20 footers. Why would you leave LMA on the mid-range jumper?UOducksTK1 wrote:Lamarcus Aldridge is absolutely losing it. 44 points, Stud!