Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
alxtw
Freshman
Posts: 1262
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by alxtw »

greenyellow wrote:What the Blazers really need to do is be sold to someone who actually cares, is willing to spend to win, and isn't just there for the executor's fees. I'm hoping the tanking season ticket and merchandise sales along with all the bad feelings from the fanbase will ultimately be what makes Jody Allen and Bert Kolde sell.
+1000%! Root of the team's problems!
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Looks like Portland may be scrounging around the Euroleague for big men as they've targeted a couple guys. Both have had cups of coffee at the NBA level but didn't stick around long. With Nurk likely being gone soon and the only other centers being two-way players, it couldn't hurt to look at them if they're on a 3-5 year rebuild plan.

https://basketnews.com/news-191439-edy- ... azers.html

https://www.blazersedge.com/2023/6/30/2 ... donta-hall
Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by greenyellow »


Image
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Image
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 4952
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by Phalanx »

Kinda seems like Cronin might be serious about opening up the trade to a bunch of different teams. This is his big chance to really kickstart the rebuild. After all the whining Lillard did about wanting to be surrounded with talent, it would be rather ironic if that happened in part by trading him away.

It's been awhile, but it looks like the Blazers are going to be fun again soon.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11001
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by buckmarkduck »

Phalanx wrote:Kinda seems like Cronin might be serious about opening up the trade to a bunch of different teams. This is his big chance to really kickstart the rebuild. After all the whining Lillard did about wanting to be surrounded with talent, it would be rather ironic if that happened in part by trading him away.

It's been awhile, but it looks like the Blazers are going to be fun again soon.

If they want to be competitive again, we need Jody to sell to Phil, and get Ainge as the GM.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by greenyellow »

Image
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11001
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by buckmarkduck »

greenyellow wrote:

So basically Miami is offering nothing of value? They should probably stop talking about trying to get dame, when it’s clear they have nothing Portland wants.
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by StevensTechU »

greenyellow wrote:Looks like Portland may be scrounging around the Euroleague for big men as they've targeted a couple guys. Both have had cups of coffee at the NBA level but didn't stick around long. With Nurk likely being gone soon and the only other centers being two-way players, it couldn't hurt to look at them if they're on a 3-5 year rebuild plan.

https://basketnews.com/news-191439-edy- ... azers.html

https://www.blazersedge.com/2023/6/30/2 ... donta-hall
Woof. Go out and sign Meyers Leonard/Lemons to a minimum at this point. Hell, I'll take Enes Kanter. (Not both. Please not both).
squintsdd
Senior
Posts: 2064
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:39 am

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by squintsdd »

StevensTechU wrote:
greenyellow wrote:Looks like Portland may be scrounging around the Euroleague for big men as they've targeted a couple guys. Both have had cups of coffee at the NBA level but didn't stick around long. With Nurk likely being gone soon and the only other centers being two-way players, it couldn't hurt to look at them if they're on a 3-5 year rebuild plan.

https://basketnews.com/news-191439-edy- ... azers.html

https://www.blazersedge.com/2023/6/30/2 ... donta-hall
Woof. Go out and sign Meyers Leonard/Lemons to a minimum at this point. Hell, I'll take Enes Kanter. (Not both. Please not both).
Honestly, I'm ok with Kanter. He's the best rebounder in the league hands down, and makes a very high percentage of his shots down low
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3817
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by bellsduck »

They can sign some scrub from the PCC bench for all I care. If they tank for a couple years, it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11001
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by buckmarkduck »

bellsduck wrote:They can sign some scrub from the PCC bench for all I care. If they tank for a couple years, it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.

Isn’t that what the blazers have already been doing the last 2 years? How many years do they have to tank, before it pays dividends?
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by StevensTechU »

buckmarkduck wrote:
bellsduck wrote:They can sign some scrub from the PCC bench for all I care. If they tank for a couple years, it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.

Isn’t that what the blazers have already been doing the last 2 years? How many years do they have to tank, before it pays dividends?
Ironically, I might pick up a multi-game package this year because I expect prices to fall a fair amount, and I'm an easy bike ride or long walk from the Rose Garden. The starting lineup of Scoot (13ppg?), Simons (20ppg?), Sharpe (15ppg?), Grant (20ppg?) and Nurk (10ppg?) isn't the worst team, though it clearly lacks a closer and the bench is almost completely barren. Reminds me, though, of the Kings of a couple years ago. Hopefully they find a good use for the $45M they're freeing up without Dame. For now, I don't expect a lot of wins, but if it's a team that plays hard then they could be pretty entertaining.
User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6276
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by pezsez1 »

Ironically, I might pick up a multi-game package this year because I expect prices to fall a fair amount, and I'm an easy bike ride or long walk from the Rose Garden. The starting lineup of Scoot (13ppg?), Simons (20ppg?), Sharpe (15ppg?), Grant (20ppg?) and Nurk (10ppg?) isn't the worst team, though it clearly lacks a closer and the bench is almost completely barren. Reminds me, though, of the Kings of a couple years ago. Hopefully they find a good use for the $45M they're freeing up without Dame. For now, I don't expect a lot of wins, but if it's a team that plays hard then they could be pretty entertaining.
Same. I'm not expecting us to win a lot of games for two or three years but watching young guys develop is fun and much less stressful. It's also way easier and cheaper to get last-minute tickets on the secondary market.

That said, if the upcoming Pac-12 media deal features a way to stream all the Duck games, then I might finally cut cable. I'll go to some Blazer games and watch highlights but don't have much incentive to watch development for multiple nights a week. I only really use cable TV for the Ducks and Blazers.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11001
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Blazers 2023-2024 Thread

Post by buckmarkduck »

pezsez1 wrote:
Ironically, I might pick up a multi-game package this year because I expect prices to fall a fair amount, and I'm an easy bike ride or long walk from the Rose Garden. The starting lineup of Scoot (13ppg?), Simons (20ppg?), Sharpe (15ppg?), Grant (20ppg?) and Nurk (10ppg?) isn't the worst team, though it clearly lacks a closer and the bench is almost completely barren. Reminds me, though, of the Kings of a couple years ago. Hopefully they find a good use for the $45M they're freeing up without Dame. For now, I don't expect a lot of wins, but if it's a team that plays hard then they could be pretty entertaining.
Same. I'm not expecting us to win a lot of games for two or three years but watching young guys develop is fun and much less stressful. It's also way easier and cheaper to get last-minute tickets on the secondary market.

That said, if the upcoming Pac-12 media deal features a way to stream all the Duck games, then I might finally cut cable. I'll go to some Blazer games and watch highlights but don't have much incentive to watch development for multiple nights a week. I only really use cable TV for the Ducks and Blazers.
I cut cable, and you really don’t save a ton of money honestly. Everyone wants to charge you for a subscription. Unless you get an unlocked fire stick or something like that.
Post Reply