Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
He’s not being retained. So La is no longer an option for JerryStevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 11, 2025 4:10 pm I can't imagine Jerry, who has only ever really known Los Angeles, would have the slightest interest in Pullman.
If Mehringer slides over to coaching QBs as OC, I wonder if Oregon could be a destination for him as a TE/co-OC.buckmarkduck wrote: Sat Dec 13, 2025 2:49 pmHe’s not being retained. So La is no longer an option for JerryStevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 11, 2025 4:10 pm I can't imagine Jerry, who has only ever really known Los Angeles, would have the slightest interest in Pullman.
Wow. Wow wow. One of the best 3 DCs in college football.pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:38 pm Sarkisian just fired his DC... interesting. Would love to see Lanning snatch Pete K as the co-DC for Hampton.
Agreed. His fall guy for underperforming this year is...his best actual coach?StevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:41 pmWow. Wow wow. One of the best 3 DCs in college football.pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:38 pm Sarkisian just fired his DC... interesting. Would love to see Lanning snatch Pete K as the co-DC for Hampton.
Was Texas’ D even the issue this year? Other than the OSU game I didn’t pay much attention to them other than the national pundits and all they bitched about was the O, particularly the lack of production from Manning. Could this be a case where Manning agreed to come back as long as they kept the OC but Sarkisian still had to fire someone for Texas way under performing this year?pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 5:13 pmAgreed. His fall guy for underperforming this year is...his best actual coach?StevensTechU wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:41 pmWow. Wow wow. One of the best 3 DCs in college football.pdxduck2013 wrote: Thu Dec 18, 2025 4:38 pm Sarkisian just fired his DC... interesting. Would love to see Lanning snatch Pete K as the co-DC for Hampton.
I just don't see where kwiatkowski would take a position at Oregon unless it's the DC. Even a co-dc feels like a downgrade for him, and likely wouldn't pay him as well as a school like usc would pay him.StevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:47 pm Oh this is great spin from FootballScoop. They write, without questioning the logic or sanity, that Sarkisian says he fired Kwiatkowski because Sark himself was spending too much time with the defense. Does anyone with more than one brain cell think a defense is better with more of Sark's voice and less of Kwiatkowski's? And Sark thought he needed to insert himself into the meeting room of a group that was #1 in the country in 2024 and not the group that was 23rd? Just complete nonsense.
https://www.footballscoop.com/2025/12/1 ... l-muschamp
I'm going to double down on my guess that there were interpersonal issues between Kwiatkowski and Sarkisian. I hadn't thought about the USC job, and was instead wondering if there was anything Lanning could do to bring him to Eugene, but ending up at USC would be a major bummer.
Let me dream, OK.squintsdd wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:59 pmI just don't see where kwiatkowski would take a position at Oregon unless it's the DC. Even a co-dc feels like a downgrade for him, and likely wouldn't pay him as well as a school like usc would pay him.StevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:47 pm Oh this is great spin from FootballScoop. They write, without questioning the logic or sanity, that Sarkisian says he fired Kwiatkowski because Sark himself was spending too much time with the defense. Does anyone with more than one brain cell think a defense is better with more of Sark's voice and less of Kwiatkowski's? And Sark thought he needed to insert himself into the meeting room of a group that was #1 in the country in 2024 and not the group that was 23rd? Just complete nonsense.
https://www.footballscoop.com/2025/12/1 ... l-muschamp
I'm going to double down on my guess that there were interpersonal issues between Kwiatkowski and Sarkisian. I hadn't thought about the USC job, and was instead wondering if there was anything Lanning could do to bring him to Eugene, but ending up at USC would be a major bummer.
Lol. Dream awayStevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 2:11 pmLet me dream, OK.squintsdd wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:59 pmI just don't see where kwiatkowski would take a position at Oregon unless it's the DC. Even a co-dc feels like a downgrade for him, and likely wouldn't pay him as well as a school like usc would pay him.StevensTechU wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:47 pm Oh this is great spin from FootballScoop. They write, without questioning the logic or sanity, that Sarkisian says he fired Kwiatkowski because Sark himself was spending too much time with the defense. Does anyone with more than one brain cell think a defense is better with more of Sark's voice and less of Kwiatkowski's? And Sark thought he needed to insert himself into the meeting room of a group that was #1 in the country in 2024 and not the group that was 23rd? Just complete nonsense.
https://www.footballscoop.com/2025/12/1 ... l-muschamp
I'm going to double down on my guess that there were interpersonal issues between Kwiatkowski and Sarkisian. I hadn't thought about the USC job, and was instead wondering if there was anything Lanning could do to bring him to Eugene, but ending up at USC would be a major bummer.