Page 3 of 4

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 2:51 pm
by Boom
I always thought he was a little over valued in that regard. I still think he was more of a specialist than a traditional RB. He wasn't nearly as effective taking carries in-between the tackles than he was in other aspects. Maybe that hit at WSU had something to do with that? But I thought there was a noticeable drop off when Barner spelled James... particularly when we were in the redzone.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:00 pm
by justducky0
Boom wrote:I always thought he was a little over valued in that regard. I still think he was more of a specialist than a traditional RB. He wasn't nearly as effective taking carries in-between the tackles than he was in other aspects. Maybe that hit at WSU had something to do with that? But I thought there was a noticeable drop off when Barner spelled James... particularly when we were in the redzone.
Interesting, I always thought there was not much of a change. Funny how that is.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:02 pm
by Phenom
Bud Lee wrote:
Phenom wrote:Richardson is the most talented, but he's not a better RB in college than LMJ.

Huh????
Richardson is bigger, stronger, etc. and is probably the better pro prospect. LMJ is the better RB in college.

There WAS a drop off between LMJ and Barner. Barner is a great second option, though.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:00 am
by Bud Lee
Phenom wrote:
Bud Lee wrote:
Phenom wrote:Richardson is the most talented, but he's not a better RB in college than LMJ.

Huh????
Richardson is bigger, stronger, etc. and is probably the better pro prospect. LMJ is the better RB in college.

There WAS a drop off between LMJ and Barner. Barner is a great second option, though.

Ah…it read funny for some reason. I think they are both great backs. I can’t help but to wonder how LMJ would do in a pro style offense though…something tells me he will end up like Reggie.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:24 pm
by buckmarkduck
We'll more than likely see next year, but unlike Reggie LMJ runs between the tackles and has never been afraid of contact. I think he will have a NFL career similar to Warrick Dunn except LMJ is bigger and faster.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:36 pm
by Bud Lee
buckmarkduck wrote:We'll more than likely see next year, but unlike Reggie LMJ runs between the tackles and has never been afraid of contact. I think he will have a NFL career similar to Warrick Dunn except LMJ is bigger and faster.
I can see that. Except for the bigger part…they are both 5’9” and weight 180-185. Plus I think Dunn's 40 time was 4.28 and James is like 4.5.

ETA: HOLD THE PHONE...James is closing in on 200 pounds! Someone must of had their thumb on the scale :lol:

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:51 pm
by lukeyrid13
LMJ actually beefed up to 195 this offseason....He could conceviably get over 200 in an NFL training camp

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:55 pm
by Bud Lee
lukeyrid13 wrote:LMJ actually beefed up to 195 this offseason....He could conceviably get over 200 in an NFL training camp

Dude must have been hitting the P90X :lol:

A 10 pound increase is A LOT for a guy his size. Assuming it is all muscle and not just cake.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:12 pm
by buckmarkduck
Barner said he played last year at 177, and now he's up over 190.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:38 pm
by Boom
It will be interesting to see how helpful the extra weight will be and if they can maintain that weight throughout the season this year.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:15 pm
by lukeyrid13
Yeah I was wondering if LMJ would keep his quickness after adding the extra LBS. If he can't then I say drop back down to 185. He was plenty strong at that weight...However if he can keep his quickness and add another 10 lbs of muscle then I'm all for it

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:18 pm
by uodux1212
buckmarkduck wrote:Barner said he played last year at 177, and now he's up over 190.
Barner broke out the guns at Media Day... holy crap, he looked huge.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:49 pm
by Supreme
JohnnyAuburn wrote:Richardson is no ingram but hell be putting up some major numbers this year behind a very experienced offensive line. Dyer is going to be great, but this isn't his year. Make this list next year and dyer will be in the top 5.

Also, oregonlive may be bad but tigerdroppings makes them look like a brain trust in comparison.
I talked to some former UT players that played against both in the 08 title game. They said Trent Richardson ran harder than any back they'd ever played against. Harder than Ingram, K. Hunter, etc. "That dude ran like he had a chip on his shoulder. Like he had something to prove. I've never played against someone that strong. It was insane", as they put it.

Most talented RB in the country imo. As far as upperclassmen are concerned at least.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:52 pm
by Supreme
Bud Lee wrote:
2. LMJ is great, but I don't think he's the most talented back in the Oregon stable.
:shock: wow...that is some high praise
DAT is one of those rare utility players that comes across every three or 4 years. The Percy Harvin, Reggie Bush, Desean Jackson type. And I believed that when he was a Trojan.

Re: College Football 20 top RBs

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:25 am
by Student265
Supreme wrote:
Bud Lee wrote:
2. LMJ is great, but I don't think he's the most talented back in the Oregon stable.
:shock: wow...that is some high praise
DAT is one of those rare utility players that comes across every three or 4 years. The Percy Harvin, Reggie Bush, Desean Jackson type. And I believed that when he was a Trojan.
The more I read about this kid, the more I can't wait to see him play!!