Blazers

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40523
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

duck55 wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:I view Leonard as a relatively safe pick. He'll be a serviceable center but never gonna be an all-star. I'm torn if that is what I'd want out of the 11th pick
That's more than we got from a #1 pick ;)
+1, if we ever get a #1 pick again, I really hope we just straight up trade it for the 2nd pick.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
duck55 wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:I view Leonard as a relatively safe pick. He'll be a serviceable center but never gonna be an all-star. I'm torn if that is what I'd want out of the 11th pick
That's more than we got from a #1 pick ;)
+1, if we ever get a #1 pick again, I really hope we just straight up trade it for the 2nd pick.
Or go keep it and just go against their natural instinct of picking what they need. Seems like drafting the best player available is typically better than drafting for need.
Image
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by oregontrack »

oden was the best player available.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39213
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Blazers

Post by greenyellow »

oregontrack wrote:oden was the best player available.
I'd argue that I thought Durant was that year.
Image
User avatar
Phenom
All Pac-12
Posts: 9914
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:49 am

Re: Blazers

Post by Phenom »

greenyellow wrote:
oregontrack wrote:oden was the best player available.
I'd argue that I thought Durant was that year.
Nope, Oden was the unanimous #1. Durant would've been #1 in most years, though. People forget how good Oden was and could have been.
oregontrack
All Pac-12
Posts: 5118
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Blazers

Post by oregontrack »

yep. every single gm in the nba would have taken oden. he was the once-in-a-generation center, durant was viewed more as an above-average scoring wing.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40523
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »


Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40523
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »


Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Blazers

Post by ncduck »

I didn't have many opportunities o watch Drummond in college, but I noticed in the workout video that he wasn't really extending his arms and attacking when going up for a rebound.

That's really not a big deal, and can be taught. I just thought it was interesting considering rebounding is considered a strength of his.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Blazers

Post by lukeyrid13 »

He actually averaged fewer than 8 rebounds a game and wasn't in the top 100 in the country for rebounds. He has the body to be a top rebounder but guys like Thomas Robinson averaged 5 more rebounds a game than Drummond did. If he can get the desire to get nasty on the boards than he will at least be a double double player
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Blazers

Post by Boom »

lukeyrid13 wrote:He actually averaged fewer than 8 rebounds a game and wasn't in the top 100 in the country for rebounds. He has the body to be a top rebounder but guys like Thomas Robinson averaged 5 more rebounds a game than Drummond did. If he can get the desire to get nasty on the boards than he will at least be a double double player
Ya, at the very least I think he's a starting caliber center for the Blazers.

He has the size/athleticism and shot blocking ability (2.7pg) to be a defensive presence on the court. I think he will likely average 8-10 rebounds, especially if he can improve his motor.

His offensive production will be limited to mostly offensive rebound put backs and lob passes for the first few years.

I think he's the best player & best fit that has a chance to fall to #6
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40523
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Blazers

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Boom wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:He actually averaged fewer than 8 rebounds a game and wasn't in the top 100 in the country for rebounds. He has the body to be a top rebounder but guys like Thomas Robinson averaged 5 more rebounds a game than Drummond did. If he can get the desire to get nasty on the boards than he will at least be a double double player
Ya, at the very least I think he's a starting caliber center for the Blazers.

He has the size/athleticism and shot blocking ability (2.7pg) to be a defensive presence on the court. I think he will likely average 8-10 rebounds, especially if he can improve his motor.

His offensive production will be limited to mostly offensive rebound put backs and lob passes for the first few years.

I think he's the best player & best fit that has a chance to fall to #6
I'm really nervous about taking a big with lots of upside and not much college play to back it up. I really love Drummond, but I'm not so sure that's the route Portland should take. I'd rather see us snag a PG or Kidd-Gilchrist/Barnes with the #6 pick. and get a center via fa/trade or perhaps with our later pick.

I really like the Weber State guy tbh.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Blazers

Post by Boom »

UOducksTK1 wrote:
Boom wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:He actually averaged fewer than 8 rebounds a game and wasn't in the top 100 in the country for rebounds. He has the body to be a top rebounder but guys like Thomas Robinson averaged 5 more rebounds a game than Drummond did. If he can get the desire to get nasty on the boards than he will at least be a double double player
Ya, at the very least I think he's a starting caliber center for the Blazers.

He has the size/athleticism and shot blocking ability (2.7pg) to be a defensive presence on the court. I think he will likely average 8-10 rebounds, especially if he can improve his motor.

His offensive production will be limited to mostly offensive rebound put backs and lob passes for the first few years.

I think he's the best player & best fit that has a chance to fall to #6
I'm really nervous about taking a big with lots of upside and not much college play to back it up. I really love Drummond, but I'm not so sure that's the route Portland should take. I'd rather see us snag a PG or Kidd-Gilchrist/Barnes with the #6 pick. and get a center via fa/trade or perhaps with our later pick.

I really like the Weber State guy tbh.
I like those two small forwards as well, but I think they're likely gone.

The reason why I think they would take Drummond over lillard is that there are probably 10-15 obtainable PG's available through free agency or trade. That's not the case with big men especially ones with high upside like Drummond.

At the very least he will give them a defensive presence to take the pressure off of Lamarcus.
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Blazers

Post by lukeyrid13 »

If Drummond is there at 6 they'll take him and then probably just try and move up to 8-9 for Lillard. It'd be a lot easier to move up to get Lillard than Drummond
User avatar
Boom
All Pac-12
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Houston Rockets

Re: Blazers

Post by Boom »

Potential free agent PG targets

Deron Williams - The prize of free agency
Steve Nash - Has another 3 allstar level years in him
Andre Miller - No more Nate
Aaron Brooks - Was the starter on a good Houston playoff team
Jameer Nelson - Not a big fan
D.J. Augustin - meh
George Hill - Solid starter, Indiana would probably match
Goran Dragic - Houston will likely let him or Kyle Lowry go
Randy Foye - meh
Mo Williams - serviceable
Ramon Sessions - serviceable
Jeremy Lin - Linsanity?
John Lucas - filled in nicely for Derick Rose

Darren Collison and Eric Bledsoe will most likely be moved via trade this offseaon as well.
Post Reply