Page 3 of 6

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:16 pm
by lukeyrid13
KVH was on auto lists to be picked around 7-8, so that he fell to 13 he was at the top of my picks to Auto.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:19 pm
by FlDuckFan
lukeyrid13 wrote:KVH was on auto lists to be picked around 7-8, so that he fell to 13 he was at the top of my picks to Auto.
I thought it was a good pick, and would have chosen him myself if I was there.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:24 pm
by Brophdog88
yes, I am aware he can go (though again, he is supposed to have B scouted, and Strickland the A scouted, as per notes) it just sucks to see him go on an auto to a team prior to a team thats around and active that wants him

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:39 pm
by Phenom
Brophdog88 wrote:yes, I am aware he can go (though again, he is supposed to have B scouted, and Strickland the A scouted, as per notes) it just sucks to see him go on an auto to a team prior to a team thats around and active that wants him
TK changes the potential and stuff if he sees fit.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:58 pm
by lukeyrid13
I'm out for a couple hours. Will update later.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:09 pm
by Brophdog88
Phenom wrote:
Brophdog88 wrote:yes, I am aware he can go (though again, he is supposed to have B scouted, and Strickland the A scouted, as per notes) it just sucks to see him go on an auto to a team prior to a team thats around and active that wants him
TK changes the potential and stuff if he sees fit.
nah, the scouteds themselves remain the same, or are to as I recall. When importing though from a draft file, it doesn't store scouteds in the file being imported, and then when you go into the offseason it randomizes them again, so you have to correct them, he missed a few it appears.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:09 pm
by Brophdog88
Its one of the most annoying things about the game.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:47 pm
by JustInCredible
Scott Pollard... really really wanted Antoine Walker.. hmu if you're interested in making a trade or something pudge.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:13 pm
by DrBradBuss
Brophdog88 wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:He's been on pretty much daily and was on this morning as pudge said. If he hadn't been on in a few days I would have given a lesser player but IMO at least Van Horn was a head above anyone else and I couldn't justify not picking him.
He has 1 post since November 25th
What should I post while my team is sucking in the depths of mediocrity? All season I've been trying to make deals with teams. I just sit here for a week watching playoffs while my team is not in it. I finally get to draft day - A day I've been waiting for for weeks and it so happens I'm busy during the time my pick comes up. There's been past drafts where people have taken 8 hours to make a pick and this was accepted, but not today. Do you see me whining about it? No.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:15 pm
by DrBradBuss
Brophdog88 wrote:yes, I am aware he can go (though again, he is supposed to have B scouted, and Strickland the A scouted, as per notes) it just sucks to see him go on an auto to a team prior to a team thats around and active that wants him
Some of us have jobs.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:18 pm
by lukeyrid13
^ For future, and for all GM's....send a list. Even if it's just a few players, presumably one of those guys should be available and you'll end up with someone you like.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:19 pm
by Brophdog88
DrBradBuss wrote:
Brophdog88 wrote:yes, I am aware he can go (though again, he is supposed to have B scouted, and Strickland the A scouted, as per notes) it just sucks to see him go on an auto to a team prior to a team thats around and active that wants him
Some of us have jobs.
lol, because it takes how long to post anything? 5 minutes to look and post, respond to somebodies post, anything... 1 post in 16 days is a lack of caring at all, not "having a job" which is just a weak ass excuse for being a ghost. Everybody here has time commitments, but one post in 16 days is weak, no matter who you are.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Clippers Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:20 pm
by Brophdog88
lukeyrid13 wrote:^ For future, and for all GM's....send a list. Even if it's just a few players, presumably one of those guys should be available and you'll end up with someone you like.
This...sending a list, if you wont be around, takes 10 minutes max. But this guy has a job, doesnt have that kinda time

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Nuggets Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:27 pm
by Phenom
Yo, chill guys.

Re: 1996 DRAFT THREAD (Nuggets Up)

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:30 pm
by Brophdog88
Matt Maloney