Can someone remind me why we didn't offer Colin Schooler?

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8757
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Can someone remind me why we didn't offer Colin Schooler

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

buckmarkduck wrote:
StevensTechU wrote:
CanadianQuackers wrote: But nobody has said they were unimpressed with Colin. There's no argument to be had here in that regard.
"As for his brother he is standing out on a pretty bad defense and I don't remember seeing him make many plays last week anyways so I don't think it's that big of a loss."

Others on this thread are 'upset' (that's overstating it, imo) because they're looking at this kid who would be a 4-year starter at Oregon play for someone else when we would have had him without even much effort put into his recruitment.
All those awesome Fr LB T UA held our running game to a measly 350 yds, while our terrible LB could only hold Tate to 32yds and UA that avg in the mid 300 coming in to 169 yds. Schooler looks fine, but don't confuse him with Scooby Wright.
It was cracking me up how the color guy kept raving about their LBs, even as the Ducks were imposing their will offensively and defensively. Kept waiting for him to highlight just one guy for Oregon ha.
Image
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Can someone remind me why we didn't offer Colin Schooler

Post by ncduck »

Sometimes, the announce crew doesn’t prepare well, and if things don’t go as they expect, they are short of material and try to force the story of the game.
Post Reply