It was cracking me up how the color guy kept raving about their LBs, even as the Ducks were imposing their will offensively and defensively. Kept waiting for him to highlight just one guy for Oregon ha.buckmarkduck wrote:All those awesome Fr LB T UA held our running game to a measly 350 yds, while our terrible LB could only hold Tate to 32yds and UA that avg in the mid 300 coming in to 169 yds. Schooler looks fine, but don't confuse him with Scooby Wright.StevensTechU wrote:"As for his brother he is standing out on a pretty bad defense and I don't remember seeing him make many plays last week anyways so I don't think it's that big of a loss."CanadianQuackers wrote: But nobody has said they were unimpressed with Colin. There's no argument to be had here in that regard.
Others on this thread are 'upset' (that's overstating it, imo) because they're looking at this kid who would be a 4-year starter at Oregon play for someone else when we would have had him without even much effort put into his recruitment.
Can someone remind me why we didn't offer Colin Schooler?
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
-
dthomas=ddixon
- Moderator

- Posts: 8757
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
- Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Re: Can someone remind me why we didn't offer Colin Schooler

- ncduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
- Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Re: Can someone remind me why we didn't offer Colin Schooler
Sometimes, the announce crew doesn’t prepare well, and if things don’t go as they expect, they are short of material and try to force the story of the game.