Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 3:40 pm
Lol I was sitting there wondering what I was missing with Elliott, not realizing he went #4 and I missed it because Suns posted 2 picks at once.
Ducks Attack Message Board Forum
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://ducksattack.com/forum/
1989 Draft Discussion
Page 3 of 5
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:03 pm
Warriors haven't logged in from over a month ago, should we wait for them?
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:14 pm
Looking to move up to 11/12
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:17 pm
YepCellar-door wrote:Pervis' writeup and grades look like he should have been in serious #1 consideration. He's already grading out as a good starting C without any improvements, I would have taken him over multiple guys who went before him.
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:18 pm
May not be 30ppg scorer was thrown in there. Potential is there, reason amazing raw on a B potentialCellar-door wrote:He looks like a high variability guy from the writeup. Everything hits he's DASL 1.0 Barros, it doesn't and he's just one of a bunch of good shooting guards
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:19 pm
I thought either Pervis or Kemp would get it. I think they could of gotten Hardaway and a future asset at 2 or 3offtheheezy wrote:Why Glen Rice? I thought it was between Hardaway and Kemp. Guess that shows this class really could've gone anywherevincent1469 wrote:Ngl was expecting Rice to go number 1
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:22 pm
Ya he's fired. Ownage will probably pick for them in a bit.offtheheezy wrote:Warriors haven't logged in from over a month ago, should we wait for them?
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 5:55 pm
Was really hoping Cliff would fall to me
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:10 pm
Files are being updated
Note: I am in all day meetings tomorrow (8-6 ET) so updates will be slower than usual and I wont be able to check things until our lunch break so please I ask, dont go crazy with stuff tomorrow
Note: I am in all day meetings tomorrow (8-6 ET) so updates will be slower than usual and I wont be able to check things until our lunch break so please I ask, dont go crazy with stuff tomorrow
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:11 pm
Thank you OwnageOregon Ownage wrote:Files are being updated
Note: I am in all day meetings tomorrow (8-6 ET) so updates will be slower than usual and I wont be able to check things until our lunch break so please I ask, dont go crazy with stuff tomorrow
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:21 pm
Micro transactions away!offtheheezy wrote:Thank you OwnageOregon Ownage wrote:Files are being updated
Note: I am in all day meetings tomorrow (8-6 ET) so updates will be slower than usual and I wont be able to check things until our lunch break so please I ask, dont go crazy with stuff tomorrow
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:24 pm
Sorry lolCellar-door wrote:Lol I was sitting there wondering what I was missing with Elliott, not realizing he went #4 and I missed it because Suns posted 2 picks at once.
I wouldnt touch Ferry with a 10ft pole but Im very intrigued to see how he turns out.
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:29 pm
Text lists to me during time frame. 7703099766Oregon Ownage wrote:Files are being updated
Note: I am in all day meetings tomorrow (8-6 ET) so updates will be slower than usual and I wont be able to check things until our lunch break so please I ask, dont go crazy with stuff tomorrow
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:39 pm
This for me too.Craig wrote:Sorry lolCellar-door wrote:Lol I was sitting there wondering what I was missing with Elliott, not realizing he went #4 and I missed it because Suns posted 2 picks at once.
I wouldnt touch Ferry with a 10ft pole but Im very intrigued to see how he turns out.
I was wanting to take him at 8, but I couldn't do it.
I thought Ellison would be available for me at 8.
So I ended up making the Sabonis deal.
Re: 1989 Draft Discussion
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:42 pm
I think Kemp didn't go cause he had Malone. Didn't Kemp sort of suck in 1.0? Maybe that had something to do with it too.jibbajabba614 wrote:I thought either Pervis or Kemp would get it. I think they could of gotten Hardaway and a future asset at 2 or 3offtheheezy wrote:Why Glen Rice? I thought it was between Hardaway and Kemp. Guess that shows this class really could've gone anywherevincent1469 wrote:Ngl was expecting Rice to go number 1