1997 Draft Discussion
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
Yeah well KVH ended up being restricted and Billups got a bump in handles. Just going off of simming
So you could say pretty close.
So you could say pretty close.
-
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
All of them are gonna be sweet but yeah I woulda gone TMac, Kobe, TD in that order. More risk, more reward. I usually just take that approach when rebuilding but I understand not feeling that way if you're not as willing to roll the diceduckyoubeavers wrote:bold statement. i could see him over duncan as hes younger but hes basically a more raw kobeJB wrote:Did everything I could to get into the top 3.
I would have taken TMac 1.
Kings
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
I think JB just hasn't been around long enough to see how deadly the "amazing raw" descriptor is.
I'd probably take McGrady over Duncan since Duncan looks pretty meh (for a clear superstar prospect I mean ).
As for KVH and Cassell, quite low on both tbh. As far as #4s and #5s go, they seem very weak.
I'd probably take McGrady over Duncan since Duncan looks pretty meh (for a clear superstar prospect I mean ).
As for KVH and Cassell, quite low on both tbh. As far as #4s and #5s go, they seem very weak.
Last edited by The Bean Regime on Wed Jul 27, 2022 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
I’m sure you mean Billups.The Bean Regime wrote:I think JB just hasn't been around long enough to see how deadly the "amazing raw" descriptor is.
I'd probably take him over Duncan since Duncan looks pretty meh (for a clear superstar prospect I mean ).
As for KVH and Cassell, quite low on both tbh. As far as #4s and #5s go, they seem very weak.
Tbh I don’t know why, but I have a feeling Billups is gonna be sick.
---
PistolPeteJR
PistolPeteJR
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
Yeah Billupspistolpetejr wrote:I’m sure you mean Billups.The Bean Regime wrote:I think JB just hasn't been around long enough to see how deadly the "amazing raw" descriptor is.
I'd probably take him over Duncan since Duncan looks pretty meh (for a clear superstar prospect I mean ).
As for KVH and Cassell, quite low on both tbh. As far as #4s and #5s go, they seem very weak.
Tbh I don’t know why, but I have a feeling Billups is gonna be sick.
-
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:49 pm
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
I didn't even really look at the descriptions, just the draft preview pageThe Bean Regime wrote:I think JB just hasn't been around long enough to see how deadly the "amazing raw" descriptor is.
I'd probably take McGrady over Duncan since Duncan looks pretty meh (for a clear superstar prospect I mean ).
As for KVH and Cassell, quite low on both tbh. As far as #4s and #5s go, they seem very weak.
Kings
- duckyoubeavers
- Sophomore
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:35 am
- GM: Toronto Raptors GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
Seems like it's more risk same reward. Kobe and TMac have similar ceilings but Kobe is starting off with a higher floorJB wrote:All of them are gonna be sweet but yeah I woulda gone TMac, Kobe, TD in that order. More risk, more reward. I usually just take that approach when rebuilding but I understand not feeling that way if you're not as willing to roll the diceduckyoubeavers wrote:bold statement. i could see him over duncan as hes younger but hes basically a more raw kobeJB wrote:Did everything I could to get into the top 3.
I would have taken TMac 1.
Raptors GM
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
I dunno. Bradley, Divac, Zo all started as prime rim protectors. Duncan already has an offensive game and rim protecting skill set.The Bean Regime wrote:I think JB just hasn't been around long enough to see how deadly the "amazing raw" descriptor is.
I'd probably take McGrady over Duncan since Duncan looks pretty meh (for a clear superstar prospect I mean ).
As for KVH and Cassell, quite low on both tbh. As far as #4s and #5s go, they seem very weak.
If I wanted to build a contending in 2-3 seasons, I’d go Duncan
If I wanted to rebuild for 5-6 years, I’d go TMac
Amazing raw guys seem to reach full potential 4-5 seasons later
- dd10snoop28
- Senior
- Posts: 4821
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
draft kinda sucks outside of top 3
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
- dd10snoop28
- Senior
- Posts: 4821
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:06 am
- GM: New Jersey Nets GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
true, past few drafts have been quite strong so I guess this is good for inflation
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
If going by RL, after Duncan, draft was pretty bust.dd10snoop28 wrote:draft kinda sucks outside of top 3
KVH became a role player. Tim Thomas a fourth option.
TMac was an unknown at 9… Billups bounced around league until ending up with Pistons.
Ownage putting Kobe in 97 made it much more interesting
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5413
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
The Eddie Js of the world are healthy for the league but devestating for the teams. On the whole a necessary evildd10snoop28 wrote:true, past few drafts have been quite strong so I guess this is good for inflation
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
Well 3 all stars in a draft is pretty much the real-life minimum, so you'd hope for more than that.Craig wrote:Well we dont need 10 all stars in every draft
KVH is looking a lot like Ferry who's probably had the best outside-PF seasons so far. LaPhonso Ellis worked out, but he was moved to SF pretty much immediately and only plays there, a luxury neither of the former 2 have.
Billups definitely has a more appealing foundation, but just lacks the little extra that nearly every other PG had coming in (Kenny Smith defense, KJ inside scoring, Payton defense, Mookie inside). His only B- being handling is a knock imo since that's always the easiest to develop (though handling itself not so much, but rather just passing affecting it so strongly).
- The Bean Regime
- Senior
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:57 pm
- GM: Minnesota Timberwolves GM
Re: 1997 Draft Discussion
Zyme wrote:The Eddie Js of the world are healthy for the league but devestating for the teams. On the whole a necessary evildd10snoop28 wrote:true, past few drafts have been quite strong so I guess this is good for inflation
Honestly a strong SG class too. Just so happened it wasn't because of him.