Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

lukeyrid13 wrote:Harrington at 5 is surprising. I thought he would be there at 8

Only player I saw with "elite" pot

I’ll pick here shortly. Have 4 teams interested in the pick. Seeing if anything pans out.

Edit: 2 teams dropped out, 2 more jumped in. Actively talking. Will pick in 30 mins if no deal. Sorry to hold up the draft.

UOducksTK1 wrote:

jibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly biggest surprise was Bibby over VC. Rightfully so due to notes. Most GM’s would of went VC at 3 but Tk listen to notes. Always trying to help fellow GM’s…

We put them up for newer GM’s though

Bibby: Good at everything, amazing potential, May end up being best player in draft
VC: high explosiveness and high athleticism (aka rating inflation), unknown whether he can score or not, and can’t shoot 3s. Oh and just as bad rebounder as Bibby.

I wouldn’t even take VC at 4 with those notes.

Yeah he did get a boost after simming…

Just gonna give it a few to take offers. I'm also still between 2 guys. I'll pick soon

jibbajabba614 wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:

jibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly biggest surprise was Bibby over VC. Rightfully so due to notes. Most GM’s would of went VC at 3 but Tk listen to notes. Always trying to help fellow GM’s…

We put them up for newer GM’s though

Bibby: Good at everything, amazing potential, May end up being best player in draft
VC: high explosiveness and high athleticism (aka rating inflation), unknown whether he can score or not, and can’t shoot 3s. Oh and just as bad rebounder as Bibby.

I wouldn’t even take VC at 4 with those notes.

Yeah he did get a boost after simming…

Typical rip on Brad pick. Or Brad gets just outside the obvious picks. Or Brad gets the name guy that never develops or develops after his rookie contract expires.

DrBradBuss wrote:

jibbajabba614 wrote:

UOducksTK1 wrote:

jibbajabba614 wrote:Honestly biggest surprise was Bibby over VC. Rightfully so due to notes. Most GM’s would of went VC at 3 but Tk listen to notes. Always trying to help fellow GM’s…

We put them up for newer GM’s though

Bibby: Good at everything, amazing potential, May end up being best player in draft
VC: high explosiveness and high athleticism (aka rating inflation), unknown whether he can score or not, and can’t shoot 3s. Oh and just as bad rebounder as Bibby.

I wouldn’t even take VC at 4 with those notes.

Yeah he did get a boost after simming…

Typical rip on Brad pick. Or Brad gets just outside the obvious picks. Or Brad gets the name guy that never develops or develops after his rookie contract expires.

Im legitimately rooting for VC to be a star for you, if it makes ypu feel any better.

Earlier in the draft, I felt like Harrington had the better chance to drop to me at 8 between him and Shard, but I valued Harrington much more so I wasn't willing to make that risk. It didn't pay off, but I did obviously get Al who was first overall on my board.

This time, I wanted Clark at pick 8 and Hughes at 11, but I felt Clark had a better chance to fall to me at 11 while Hughes definitely didn't. But since the gap was closer, I was willing to risk it and it paid off this time.

My goal was to walk away with Harrington and Shard. But Harrington, Hughes, and Clark is still a really nice draft. Clark is very much my type of big. Low volume and high value defense and rebounding. Happy to pair him with Ben Wallace long term

Was kind of hoping Brad Miller at the bottom of the notes would result in him falling to 15 darn Grizz! haha

No one good left.
Probably trade this for future picks and get nothing out of it.

bellsduck wrote:No one good left.
Probably trade this for future picks and get nothing out of it.

Really? I see a couple guys I would’ve taken top 10.

there is a steal still left

There are a couple guys that I wouldn’t mind making a move for left

Entertaining a few offers right now so might be a bit

Surprised Kandi and Tractor fell out of top 10… I thought I gave them pretty good notes.

jibbajabba614 wrote:Surprised Kandi and Tractor fell out of top 10… I thought I gave them pretty good notes.

I wanted Tractor.